To Laurent
From B Jones
In reference to the statement below . I beleive the same and
have for many years. Glad to see others feel the same.
Alittle addon, I believe time is no more or less then a word for describing
movement and cause and effect. Rather to say if no movement or interaction
of any kind, would be no change. In the same sence by going at higher speeds
the resistance of aether(space,ect) will cause a slowing of all components
of the matter in question.Therefore less change. Just a few ideas
---------------
: Matter and space are one single entity, but matter
: emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
: matter can't exist without space.
:
: For there to be time there has to be matter and matter
: is a product of process, therefore time is a product of
: process, there can't be time without process. Time
: can't exist without matter and vice-versa. Without time
: there can't particles and without particles there can't
: be time.
----------------------------


"Laurent" wrote in message ...
:
: "Fred" wrote in message
: ...
: "RHNL" wrote in message
: ...
:
: If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a
: function of it's
: definition.
: Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a
: synthetic, linear measure.
:
: If not so, does time radiate?
:
: Time is bound up with space, such that everything in
: space always interacts
: with time. However, time is not space. When you speak
: of waves and
: particlss, you are referring to spatial concepts, not
: temporal.
:
:
:
: Matter and space are one single entity, but matter
: emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
: matter can't exist without space.
:
: For there to be time there has to be matter and matter
: is a product of process, therefore time is a product of
: process, there can't be time without process. Time
: can't exist without matter and vice-versa. Without time
: there can't particles and without particles there can't
: be time.
:
: Time is just the parameter used to determine the speed
: at which a given particle exists in a given inertial
: frame.
:
: --
: Laurent

In all of history, if a definition of 'time', that is, an incremental
metric,
a metric tensor, what would we have?

"B Jones" wrote in message
news:yaPQe.13364$k32.4415@trnddc08...
To Laurent
From B Jones
In reference to the statement below . I beleive the same and
have for many years. Glad to see others feel the same.
Alittle addon, I believe time is no more or less then a word for
describing
movement and cause and effect. Rather to say if no movement or interaction
of any kind, would be no change. In the same sence by going at higher
speeds
the resistance of aether(space,ect) will cause a slowing of all components
of the matter in question.Therefore less change. Just a few ideas
---------------
: Matter and space are one single entity, but matter
: emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
: matter can't exist without space.
:
: For there to be time there has to be matter and matter
: is a product of process, therefore time is a product of
: process, there can't be time without process. Time
: can't exist without matter and vice-versa. Without time
: there can't particles and without particles there can't
: be time.
----------------------------


"Laurent" wrote in message
...
:
: "Fred" wrote in message
: ...
: "RHNL" wrote in message
: ...
:
: If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a
: function of it's
: definition.
: Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a
: synthetic, linear measure.
:
: If not so, does time radiate?
:
: Time is bound up with space, such that everything in
: space always interacts
: with time. However, time is not space. When you speak
: of waves and
: particlss, you are referring to spatial concepts, not
: temporal.
:
:
:
: Matter and space are one single entity, but matter
: emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
: matter can't exist without space.
:
: For there to be time there has to be matter and matter
: is a product of process, therefore time is a product of
: process, there can't be time without process. Time
: can't exist without matter and vice-versa. Without time
: there can't particles and without particles there can't
: be time.
:
: Time is just the parameter used to determine the speed
: at which a given particle exists in a given inertial
: frame.
:
: --
: Laurent

My previous post was incomplete, let me clarify:

[If] in all of history, the definition of 'time' [is removed], that is
[defined as measurement],
or as an incremental metric, [or] metric tensor [for QM], what would
[remain]?

[In other words, for the sake of argument, let's assume 'time' in any
incarnatation, including
language, simply did not exist.

RHNL

wrote in message
...
In all of history, if a definition of 'time', that is, an incremental
metric,
a metric tensor, what would we have?

"B Jones" wrote in message
news:yaPQe.13364$k32.4415@trnddc08...
To Laurent
From B Jones
In reference to the statement below . I beleive the same and
have for many years. Glad to see others feel the same.
Alittle addon, I believe time is no more or less then a word for
describing
movement and cause and effect. Rather to say if no movement or
interaction
of any kind, would be no change. In the same sence by going at higher
speeds
the resistance of aether(space,ect) will cause a slowing of all
components
of the matter in question.Therefore less change. Just a few ideas
---------------
: Matter and space are one single entity, but matter
: emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
: matter can't exist without space.
:
: For there to be time there has to be matter and matter
: is a product of process, therefore time is a product of
: process, there can't be time without process. Time
: can't exist without matter and vice-versa. Without time
: there can't particles and without particles there can't
: be time.
----------------------------


"Laurent" wrote in message
...
:
: "Fred" wrote in message
: ...
: "RHNL" wrote in message
: ...
:
: If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a
: function of it's
: definition.
: Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a
: synthetic, linear measure.
:
: If not so, does time radiate?
:
: Time is bound up with space, such that everything in
: space always interacts
: with time. However, time is not space. When you speak
: of waves and
: particlss, you are referring to spatial concepts, not
: temporal.
:
:
:
: Matter and space are one single entity, but matter
: emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
: matter can't exist without space.
:
: For there to be time there has to be matter and matter
: is a product of process, therefore time is a product of
: process, there can't be time without process. Time
: can't exist without matter and vice-versa. Without time
: there can't particles and without particles there can't
: be time.
:
: Time is just the parameter used to determine the speed
: at which a given particle exists in a given inertial
: frame.
:
: --
: Laurent

"RHNL" wrote in message
...

Continuity...

The concept of "time'' is basically that space and particles _continue_
.....changed or not.

These are close to the truth:

http://cdsweb.cern.ch/search.py?recid=622019

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001197/

http://pages.sbcglobal.net/louis.sav...y%20Is%20Time?


from: Spirit of Truth

(using June's e-mail to communicate to you)!