If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a function of it's definition.
Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic, linear measure.

If not so, does time radiate?

R. Henry Nigl
www.exoptica.com

"RHNL" wrote in message
...

If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a function of it's
definition.
Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic, linear measure.

If not so, does time radiate?

Time is bound up with space, such that everything in space always interacts
with time. However, time is not space. When you speak of waves and
particlss, you are referring to spatial concepts, not temporal.

I suggest waves and particles cannot be defined in the absence of the
temporal.


"Fred" wrote in message
...
"RHNL" wrote in message
...

If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a function of it's
definition.
Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic, linear measure.

If not so, does time radiate?

Time is bound up with space, such that everything in space always
interacts
with time. However, time is not space. When you speak of waves and
particlss, you are referring to spatial concepts, not temporal.

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a function of it's
definition.
Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic, linear
measure.

If not so, does time radiate?

R. Henry Nigl
www.exoptica.com



Stop masturbating... waves exibit time properties and that's it.

--
Laurent

Thank you so much for remembering our last time together.

I agree.

Always,

RHNL



"Laurent" wrote in message
...
"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a function of it's
definition.
Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic, linear
measure.

If not so, does time radiate?

R. Henry Nigl
www.exoptica.com



Stop masturbating... waves exibit time properties and that's it.

--
Laurent

"RHNL" wrote in message
...

I suggest waves and particles cannot be defined in the absence of the
temporal.

This is quite obviously correct.

"Fred" wrote in message
...
"RHNL" wrote in message
...

If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a
function of it's
definition.
Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a
synthetic, linear measure.

If not so, does time radiate?

Time is bound up with space, such that everything in
space always interacts
with time. However, time is not space. When you speak
of waves and
particlss, you are referring to spatial concepts, not
temporal.



Matter and space are one single entity, but matter
emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
matter can't exist without space.

For there to be time there has to be matter and matter
is a product of process, therefore time is a product of
process, there can't be time without process. Time
can't exist without matter and vice-versa. Without time
there can't particles and without particles there can't
be time.

Time is just the parameter used to determine the speed
at which a given particle exists in a given inertial
frame.

--
Laurent

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
Thank you so much for remembering our last time
together.

I agree.

Always,

RHNL



"Laurent" wrote in message

...
"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a
function of it's
definition.
Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a
synthetic, linear
measure.

If not so, does time radiate?

R. Henry Nigl
www.exoptica.com



Stop masturbating... waves exibit time properties
and that's it.

--
Laurent





What I am trying to say is that time isn't a
fundamental, nor a primary property of spacetime, if
that were so, it would remain unchanged or unaffected
as you determine relations between inertial frames.

The speed of light, like electromagnetism, for example,
are not dependent on the inertial frame because their
speed is determined at a deeper level, the aether
level. The speed of light, like electromagnetism, are
primary properties of spacetime or reality.

--
Laurent

"Laurent" wrote in message
...

What I am trying to say is that time isn't a
fundamental, nor a primary property of spacetime, if

Then you think that the name spacetime is a mistake, if time is not an
important part of spaceTIME.

that were so, it would remain unchanged or unaffected
as you determine relations between inertial frames.

I do not understand why you consider this to be so. We are not talking about
time, but about space-time. Space-time does remain unchanged, in its
totality, but not in its parts. The constant in the relationship between
space and time, in space-time, is the speed of light.

The speed of light, like electromagnetism, for example,
are not dependent on the inertial frame because their
speed is determined at a deeper level, the aether
level.

Do you think that there is aether?

From B Jones
In reference to the statement below . I beleive the same and
have for many years. Glad to see others feel the same.
Alittle addon, I believe time is no more or less then a word for describing
movement and cause and effect. Rather to say if no movement or interaction
of any kind, would be no change. In the same sence by going at higher speeds
the resistance of aether(space,ect) will cause a slowing of all components
of the matter in question.Therefore less change. Just a few ideas

B Jones
---------------
: emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
: matter can't exist without space.. If Matter and space are one single entity, but matter
: emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
: matter can't exist without space.
----------------------------
"Laurent" wrote in message ...
:
: "Fred" wrote in message
: ...
: "RHNL" wrote in message
: ...
:
: If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a
: function of it's
: definition.
: Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a
: synthetic, linear measure.
:
: If not so, does time radiate?
:
: Time is bound up with space, such that everything in
: space always interacts
: with time. However, time is not space. When you speak
: of waves and
: particlss, you are referring to spatial concepts, not
: temporal.
:
:
:
: Matter and space are one single entity, but matter
: emerged from space, space can exist without matter but
: matter can't exist without space.
:
: For there to be time there has to be matter and matter
: is a product of process, therefore time is a product of
: process, there can't be time without process. Time
: can't exist without matter and vice-versa. Without time
: there can't particles and without particles there can't
: be time.
:
: Time is just the parameter used to determine the speed
: at which a given particle exists in a given inertial
: frame.
:
: --
: Laurent
: