The Smart Model Origins And The Book Of Genesis Similarities

One of the first things I did in the development of The Smart Model was show
what light really is as a field and particle, showing it's basic internal and
external structure and WHY it took on the form it did. Well one of the first
things The Creator, God did was to Create light. In Genesis it says, And God
said, Let there be light.
The Smart Model also shows starting points in creation with universal
structure, starting with light itself too. I am the first human to show what
light really is in regard to internal and external structure.
From there The Creator when on to the other days of Creation. I too went
through this in the development of the Smart Model that has lead to the basic
structure of the DNA and the human being and all creatures and plants. I also
show too that the universe was without form UNTIL The Smart Model developed the
things in structure that would cause creation to begin.
In Genesis it shows that in the Beginning God Created the Heaven and Earth.
This is also a beginning with the Smart Model. It then shows the Spirit of God
moved across the waters, this means He moved through a Fliud Field. The Smart
Model shows the Fluid Aether Field and the Spiritual particle-fields (
sub-sub-sub-sub-particles) that make The Spirit Of God. From The Smart Model
these spirit particles are given to Adam too to cause him to come to life. We
are then made in the image of The Creator God.
Years earlier I worked on the Artificial Intelligence that could be applied
to a living human being. It worked with only about 50K amount of logic, on an
old radio shack color computer. I also years ago showed what is the void and
chaos that The Creator went through. I showed how existence came to exist.
Using The Smart Law of Existence. So The Creator also used This existence law,
to begin the Creation of this universe. By His works and imagination, the
universe came into existence. God worked for 6 days ( relatively speaking) and
rested on the 7th. The Smart Model shows what rest really is. And how it
relates to movement and so on.... .

It appears I am a Co-Creator of this universe UNDER GOD. My work belongs to
The Creator and The Lord. If you follow through the bible, MY work too is found
there, all the way to the making of The New Universe, shown in the Book Of
Revelations. Am I God? No. I am a part of God. I am just a mere humble human
that struggles to make his contribution for God. And as the Body of God
benefits, WE THEN BENEFIT.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message ...

[EL]
There are many witnesses that your model was something that looked
like a watermelon, which you bought


[smart]
No it didn't.


[EL]
Naturally, smart1234 has deleted the watermelon image from his website
after he adopted my ideas presented on my website after it was updated
on February 1999.
To cut the race short, I challenge smart1234 to produce any URL on
DejaNews (that was the name at that time) in which he mentions
anything about helical structure or vortex before February 1999, even
though my work goes back to 1974-1984 when my vision was completed
without the mathematics. Then I finished the derivations during
1990-1994, so I do not claim to have had any complete theory before
1994 like smart does fraudulently.

So here is my challenge:
[[[Produce any reference to a post in which you say that you have a
theory on the atomic structure with a vortex model or even a helical
structure before February 1999]]]

You CAN NOT.

Here are some refreshing URL's

http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=...co.uk&rnum =1

This very long URL shall take you to David Kipping's post on
1999/08/18

The title was "Smart1234's theory- disproven."

BY August 1999 smart was still being laughed at because of his
watermelon (Rutherford) model of the atom.

Enjoy.


Exerpts

{
I once and for all decided to take the time and show everyone how
false this
theory is. Smart breezes over laws of physics that mean he cannot
have such
atoms and ignores the fact electron orbital tracks are possible.
}


{
The deflections must be caused by the
positive charges in the atoms of the metal foil (like charges as with
magnetic poles, repel one another), but if the current watermelon
model of
the atom (made by Thomson) were correct no particles would be bounced
back.
If the sphere of positive charge filled the atom (watermelon model),
then
the alpha particles must go straight through the foil. If the
watermelon
let one particle through, it ought to let them all through.
}

{
Smart's model is very dense in comparison and Rutherfood's
experiment proves Smart's model cannot work.
}

And some more links

http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=....net.uk&rnum=1

http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=...eja.com&rnum=2

http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=...eja.com&rnum=3

http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=....net.uk&rnum=9