A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - New Theories
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 25th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

http://hipe.uia.ac.be/cmt/atom.html

Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then
release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting
together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated
particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital
fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom.
This animation shows that like particles DO repel each other. In the QM
model of the atom, used with the Periodic Table of Elements, there can be
hundreds of "like charged" electrons in the orbitals. But as they run into
each other and repel, or as other FREE ELECTRONS collide with the electrons in
the QM orbitals, YOU CAN SEE ( with your own eyes) that the orbitals become
even MORE chaotic and NOT a nice looking orbital field, like an s orbital or p
and so on, predicted by the QM model.
The Smart Model DOES NOT USE this nonsense of orbital electron fields. The
fields it uses is the Aether Fluid ( sub-sub-partcles) that spin in an
INTELLIGENT CREATED structural angular momentum field or Helix Spiral Field (
vortex field) that forms each sub-particle. Then each sub-particle interacts
directly, as The Smart Model Theory shows. There is a direct stable interaction
between each electron with the neutrino and proton, per atom of an element. The
atomic structures observed in REAL atomic images ARE showing that the Smart
Model predictions ARE correct in regard to element structure.
If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the chemical
level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each other
in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java
animation.

You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on
earth today.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Ads
  #2  
Old September 25th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

http://hipe.uia.ac.be/cmt/atom.html

Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then
release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting
together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated
particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital
fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom.
This animation shows that like particles DO repel each other. In the QM
model of the atom, used with the Periodic Table of Elements, there can be
hundreds of "like charged" electrons in the orbitals. But as they run into
each other and repel, or as other FREE ELECTRONS collide with the electrons
in
the QM orbitals, YOU CAN SEE ( with your own eyes) that the orbitals become
even MORE chaotic and NOT a nice looking orbital field, like an s orbital or
p
and so on, predicted by the QM model.
The Smart Model DOES NOT USE this nonsense of orbital electron fields. The
fields it uses is the Aether Fluid ( sub-sub-partcles) that spin in an
INTELLIGENT CREATED structural angular momentum field or Helix Spiral Field (
vortex field) that forms each sub-particle. Then each sub-particle interacts
directly, as The Smart Model Theory shows. There is a direct stable
interaction
between each electron with the neutrino and proton, per atom of an element.
The
atomic structures observed in REAL atomic images ARE showing that the Smart
Model predictions ARE correct in regard to element structure.
If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the
chemical
level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each
other
in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java
animation.

You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on
earth today.


And as soon as the world realizes that The Smart Model was correct for all
the years and years and years, while Smart1234 was made to look like a fool, a
stupid idiot, rejected, hated, put through HELL on earth, and damned by people
trying to control him and his mind, by trying take away his free will to live
peacefully and to do good things and charity to help others and science and
physics, don't forget to add your donations of 10% per profit of each new
re-written book in the entire world, for all future generations. This will
assist me in ALL my HARD work I DID in physics in this world. And it should
make me a multi-trillionaire. I could even buy most of this planet eventually.
Oh but of course it would then be transferred to The Lord for His good
pleasure. The True and Faithful Owner of this planet and universe, Who is, was
and shall be, One with The Creator, God ( The Heavenly Father).


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


  #3  
Old September 26th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
cinquirer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,071
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Smart1234. The Smart Model can be a good candidate of being the
"most correct model on earth" (as you implied) if it can describe
Qi and all its behavior. What do you think of the following
described by an expert on Qi. Pls. try to describe it thru the
Smart Model (I'll give my personal validation of it afterwards).

"Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the
etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and
mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in
preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West
corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril,
orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy
and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in
which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing
functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital
requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes
infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to
"angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to
align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components
of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the
guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric
"angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of
perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological
"positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field
patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi
influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position
(i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of
indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient
relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge
adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the -
given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and
holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly
"within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as
with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or
occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an
indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent
micro-boundaries."

-----------

Some may say that the above is a string of high sounding words that
attempted to convey knowledge though not based on reality. But if you
will analyze it carefully. It appears the person is seriously studying
qi as he made many points that can only confirmed by personal
experience. The following is the properties of Qi as I directly
experience it and others may do their own investigation (I'm
categorically certain of the existence of Qi from extensive
investigations and hands-on with it):

1. Qi is interactive with geometrical form (for example, Triangular
shape can focus it, especially when a group of it are combined such as
in a pyramid structure. Remember some decades back when pyramid
cardboard box are reported to sharpen razor (maybe something to do
with crystalline structure reorganization although I haven't tried any
razor testing so can't vouch for the validity of this). But if you put
your hand inside a cardboard pyramid. You can feel qi focusing densely
on your hand or seers can see the increased energy field inside of
it).

2. Qi is not just a property of physical matter but also function in
the astral, mental and causal field (as esoterically defined by many
traditional schools and directly perceived by practitioners). For
example. The spleen chakra digests planetary qi, but other chakras
absorb more of astral qi than planetary qi.

3. Personal Qi is non-local such as when affecting other bioplasmic
body at a distance (used in distance healing, etc.)

etc.

Before I go. Let me mention the following again (pls read it anew
carefully):

"Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the
etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and
mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in
preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West
corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril,
orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy
and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in
which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing
functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital
requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes
infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to
"angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to
align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components
of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the
guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric
"angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of
perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological
"positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field
patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi
influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position
(i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of
indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient
relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge
adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the -
given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and
holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly
"within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as
with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or
occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an
indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent
micro-boundaries."


c



(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message ...
Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

http://hipe.uia.ac.be/cmt/atom.html

Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then
release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting
together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated
particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital
fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom.
This animation shows that like particles DO repel each other. In the QM
model of the atom, used with the Periodic Table of Elements, there can be
hundreds of "like charged" electrons in the orbitals. But as they run into
each other and repel, or as other FREE ELECTRONS collide with the electrons
in
the QM orbitals, YOU CAN SEE ( with your own eyes) that the orbitals become
even MORE chaotic and NOT a nice looking orbital field, like an s orbital or
p
and so on, predicted by the QM model.
The Smart Model DOES NOT USE this nonsense of orbital electron fields. The
fields it uses is the Aether Fluid ( sub-sub-partcles) that spin in an
INTELLIGENT CREATED structural angular momentum field or Helix Spiral Field (
vortex field) that forms each sub-particle. Then each sub-particle interacts
directly, as The Smart Model Theory shows. There is a direct stable
interaction
between each electron with the neutrino and proton, per atom of an element.
The
atomic structures observed in REAL atomic images ARE showing that the Smart
Model predictions ARE correct in regard to element structure.
If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the
chemical
level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each
other
in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java
animation.

You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on
earth today.


And as soon as the world realizes that The Smart Model was correct for all
the years and years and years, while Smart1234 was made to look like a fool, a
stupid idiot, rejected, hated, put through HELL on earth, and damned by people
trying to control him and his mind, by trying take away his free will to live
peacefully and to do good things and charity to help others and science and
physics, don't forget to add your donations of 10% per profit of each new
re-written book in the entire world, for all future generations. This will
assist me in ALL my HARD work I DID in physics in this world. And it should
make me a multi-trillionaire. I could even buy most of this planet eventually.
Oh but of course it would then be transferred to The Lord for His good
pleasure. The True and Faithful Owner of this planet and universe, Who is, was
and shall be, One with The Creator, God ( The Heavenly Father).


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

  #4  
Old September 26th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Smart1234. The Smart Model can be a good candidate of being the
"most correct model on earth" (as you implied) if it can describe
Qi and all its behavior. What do you think of the following
described by an expert on Qi. Pls. try to describe it thru the
Smart Model (I'll give my personal validation of it afterwards).

"Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the
etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and
mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in
preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West
corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril,
orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy
and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in
which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing
functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital
requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes
infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to
"angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to
align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components
of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the
guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric
"angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of
perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological
"positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field
patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi
influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position
(i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of
indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient
relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge
adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the -
given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and
holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly
"within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as
with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or
occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an
indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent
micro-boundaries."

-----------

Some may say that the above is a string of high sounding words that
attempted to convey knowledge though not based on reality. But if you
will analyze it carefully. It appears the person is seriously studying
qi as he made many points that can only confirmed by personal
experience. The following is the properties of Qi as I directly
experience it and others may do their own investigation (I'm
categorically certain of the existence of Qi from extensive
investigations and hands-on with it):

1. Qi is interactive with geometrical form (for example, Triangular
shape can focus it, especially when a group of it are combined such as
in a pyramid structure. Remember some decades back when pyramid
cardboard box are reported to sharpen razor (maybe something to do
with crystalline structure reorganization although I haven't tried any
razor testing so can't vouch for the validity of this). But if you put
your hand inside a cardboard pyramid. You can feel qi focusing densely
on your hand or seers can see the increased energy field inside of
it).

2. Qi is not just a property of physical matter but also function in
the astral, mental and causal field (as esoterically defined by many
traditional schools and directly perceived by practitioners). For
example. The spleen chakra digests planetary qi, but other chakras
absorb more of astral qi than planetary qi.

3. Personal Qi is non-local such as when affecting other bioplasmic
body at a distance (used in distance healing, etc.)

etc.

Before I go. Let me mention the following again (pls read it anew
carefully):

"Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the
etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and
mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in
preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West
corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril,
orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy
and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in
which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing
functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital
requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes
infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to
"angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to
align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components
of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the
guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric
"angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of
perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological
"positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field
patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi
influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position
(i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of
indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient
relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge
adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the -
given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and
holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly
"within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as
with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or
occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an
indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent
micro-boundaries."


c



I think the "Qi" would apply to the Smart Model this way. First we have to
show the relationship between the mind ( imaginary part) and Reality. I called
it, "Smart's Proposed Law of Existence"

Imagination ( mind) + Power ( work/time) = Reality

An example of how it works is like this. Remember the Wright Brothers? They
imagined or had the idea that they could fly. They then applied work per time (
power) to it and it eventually became reality. Then as others applied more
power to it, we obtained even better ways to fly ( jets, etc...)

The "Qi" at the Smart Model sub-atomic level would be something like this.
We are made of atoms at the physical level. Then these atoms are made of
particles and particles are made of sub-particles, and sub-particles are made
of sub-sub-particles ( Aether) and sub-sub-particles are made of
sub-sub-sub-particles which are unifying field particles that provide a balance
between the forces of large with small in this universe. These fields operate
naturally and automatically, set up first by The Creator, God. Where do we come
in at, as animate beings? The particles shown up to this point can be regarded
as inanimate and regulate the physical universe as we know it. There is an
additional field of particles that are called, sub-sub-sub-sub spiritual (
"Qi") particles. These particles act independently BUT with the physical
universe. And they are located in the mind and soul ( or spirit) of each
person. These particles allow for consciousness, life, faith, hope, love a
higher level of intelligence other than an animal and allow for our FREE WILL
to move at will and where we want to move. Animals move instinctively, but we
can move where we want to by our free will. The mind has different levels of
access to the physical world and the astral world. When we are awake we are in
the conscious state of mind and relate mostly to the atomic level of existence
( this level of physical reality that we can see with our eyeballs). In the
sleep state or sub-conscious state of mind we have a different level of
awareness state of mind. If we can become conscious in the sub-conscious we can
have free will in a higher mental state or "Qi" state.
Some people experience an out of body astral projection. This is where the
sub-sub-sub-sub particles that make up your astral body reach a composite state
and can leave the physical body. We are still connected although to the
physical body if we are still alive in the physical body. So I would say a
little space-time worm hole field designs free willed transport destination and
we then astral project out into another location. Then as we begin to awake,
the mind generates a field that brings us back to our body and closes the
little mind generated worm hole.
When people die I think this astral body permanently leaves our physical
body and this astral body ( or soul) goes to places we have believed to exist
such as heaven or the world we imagined or possibly reincarnation or ....???
This is a very open field of possibilities.
I think the best choice for the astral body ( or soul) would be to go to
Heaven, where the New Universe is located.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


  #5  
Old September 27th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Kevin Watkins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then
release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting
together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated
particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital
fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom.


You are really bloody stupid aren't you? Others and I have told you
hundreds of times that you CANNOT SEE ORBITALS. They are not a
physical entity - they are a probability distribution. You simply do
not understand quantum mechanics and have no knowledge of it
whatsoever, so don't claim it is wrong until you have studied it.

If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the chemical
level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each other
in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java
animation.


Totally stupid. Read the title: "Two Dimensional Classical Atom".
Classical atom yes? Not quantum. The whole reason we came up with a
quantum theory of the atom is because the classical model doesn't
work!

You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on
earth today.


No it's not you sad deluded moron with a Messianic complex. I'm sorry
to start insulting you, but you keep ignoring my points when I'm nice
to you; perhaps this way some of it will stick. I certainly find most
of your points offensive - to humankind, intelligence, common sense
and reason.

Kev
  #6  
Old September 28th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode
java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and

then
release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles

interacting
together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated
particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice

orbital
fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom.


You are really bloody stupid aren't you? Others and I have told you
hundreds of times that you CANNOT SEE ORBITALS. They are not a
physical entity - they are a probability distribution. You simply do
not understand quantum mechanics and have no knowledge of it
whatsoever, so don't claim it is wrong until you have studied it.

If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the

chemical
level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each

other
in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java
animation.


Totally stupid. Read the title: "Two Dimensional Classical Atom".
Classical atom yes? Not quantum. The whole reason we came up with a
quantum theory of the atom is because the classical model doesn't
work!

You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on
earth today.


No it's not you sad deluded moron with a Messianic complex. I'm sorry
to start insulting you, but you keep ignoring my points when I'm nice
to you; perhaps this way some of it will stick. I certainly find most
of your points offensive - to humankind, intelligence, common sense
and reason.

Kev




You sound like you've had a bad day. I hope things get better for you. I
wish you well. But, a probability distribution of WHAT????? electrons.




Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


  #7  
Old September 30th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Mark Palenik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 855
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect


"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message
...
Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode

java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and

then
release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles

interacting
together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more

animated
particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice

orbital
fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom.


You are really bloody stupid aren't you? Others and I have told you
hundreds of times that you CANNOT SEE ORBITALS. They are not a
physical entity - they are a probability distribution. You simply do
not understand quantum mechanics and have no knowledge of it
whatsoever, so don't claim it is wrong until you have studied it.

If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the

chemical
level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into

each
other
in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the

java
animation.


Totally stupid. Read the title: "Two Dimensional Classical Atom".
Classical atom yes? Not quantum. The whole reason we came up with a
quantum theory of the atom is because the classical model doesn't
work!

You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model

on
earth today.


No it's not you sad deluded moron with a Messianic complex. I'm sorry
to start insulting you, but you keep ignoring my points when I'm nice
to you; perhaps this way some of it will stick. I certainly find most
of your points offensive - to humankind, intelligence, common sense
and reason.

Kev




You sound like you've had a bad day. I hope things get better for you.

I
wish you well. But, a probability distribution of WHAT????? electrons.


Of *electron*, and electron, as in one. There aren't a bunch of electrons
scattered around in the approximate shape of an orbital. An orbital can be
thought of as a region where an electron is likely to be, if we choose to
look for it. Of course, that's a bit of oversimplification, but it gets the
basic idea across.


  #8  
Old October 1st 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
cinquirer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,071
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Smart1234,

I think some of your ideas are very colored by your belief in the
Christian God. You may have a point about Qi being sub-sub-sub-sub
particles (subject to more reseach and experimentations on the exact
physics of it) but your idea about the New Universe stems from your
belief in the Christian God. Right? Don't take the Bible so literally.
For example. Just as an example. Suppose the world suffers near
nuclear annihilation or asteroid impact in 2030 and 90% of humans die.
And supposing the leader that rise up is a supporter of Saddam. He and
the other supporters of Saddam would slowly structure society to
their belief and faith. So children in 2200 A.D. would be taught for
example that Saddam is God and the Lord of the Universe. See the
logic or illogic of it?? Jehovah can be like Saddam too. So don't
use blind faith and emotion to direct your mind. Anyway. I have
to use a lot of filtering to get what you are conveying in terms
of pure technical reasoning and emotional ones (your to the max
Christian faith and ideas deeply colored by it)

c



(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message ...
Smart1234. The Smart Model can be a good candidate of being the
"most correct model on earth" (as you implied) if it can describe
Qi and all its behavior. What do you think of the following
described by an expert on Qi. Pls. try to describe it thru the
Smart Model (I'll give my personal validation of it afterwards).

"Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the
etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and
mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in
preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West
corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril,
orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy
and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in
which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing
functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital
requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes
infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to
"angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to
align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components
of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the
guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric
"angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of
perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological
"positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field
patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi
influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position
(i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of
indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient
relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge
adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the -
given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and
holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly
"within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as
with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or
occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an
indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent
micro-boundaries."

-----------

Some may say that the above is a string of high sounding words that
attempted to convey knowledge though not based on reality. But if you
will analyze it carefully. It appears the person is seriously studying
qi as he made many points that can only confirmed by personal
experience. The following is the properties of Qi as I directly
experience it and others may do their own investigation (I'm
categorically certain of the existence of Qi from extensive
investigations and hands-on with it):

1. Qi is interactive with geometrical form (for example, Triangular
shape can focus it, especially when a group of it are combined such as
in a pyramid structure. Remember some decades back when pyramid
cardboard box are reported to sharpen razor (maybe something to do
with crystalline structure reorganization although I haven't tried any
razor testing so can't vouch for the validity of this). But if you put
your hand inside a cardboard pyramid. You can feel qi focusing densely
on your hand or seers can see the increased energy field inside of
it).

2. Qi is not just a property of physical matter but also function in
the astral, mental and causal field (as esoterically defined by many
traditional schools and directly perceived by practitioners). For
example. The spleen chakra digests planetary qi, but other chakras
absorb more of astral qi than planetary qi.

3. Personal Qi is non-local such as when affecting other bioplasmic
body at a distance (used in distance healing, etc.)

etc.

Before I go. Let me mention the following again (pls read it anew
carefully):

"Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the
etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and
mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in
preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West
corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril,
orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy
and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in
which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing
functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital
requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes
infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to
"angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to
align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components
of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the
guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric
"angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of
perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological
"positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field
patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi
influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position
(i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of
indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient
relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge
adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the -
given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and
holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly
"within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as
with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or
occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an
indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent
micro-boundaries."


c



I think the "Qi" would apply to the Smart Model this way. First we have to
show the relationship between the mind ( imaginary part) and Reality. I called
it, "Smart's Proposed Law of Existence"

Imagination ( mind) + Power ( work/time) = Reality

An example of how it works is like this. Remember the Wright Brothers? They
imagined or had the idea that they could fly. They then applied work per time (
power) to it and it eventually became reality. Then as others applied more
power to it, we obtained even better ways to fly ( jets, etc...)

The "Qi" at the Smart Model sub-atomic level would be something like this.
We are made of atoms at the physical level. Then these atoms are made of
particles and particles are made of sub-particles, and sub-particles are made
of sub-sub-particles ( Aether) and sub-sub-particles are made of
sub-sub-sub-particles which are unifying field particles that provide a balance
between the forces of large with small in this universe. These fields operate
naturally and automatically, set up first by The Creator, God. Where do we come
in at, as animate beings? The particles shown up to this point can be regarded
as inanimate and regulate the physical universe as we know it. There is an
additional field of particles that are called, sub-sub-sub-sub spiritual (
"Qi") particles. These particles act independently BUT with the physical
universe. And they are located in the mind and soul ( or spirit) of each
person. These particles allow for consciousness, life, faith, hope, love a
higher level of intelligence other than an animal and allow for our FREE WILL
to move at will and where we want to move. Animals move instinctively, but we
can move where we want to by our free will. The mind has different levels of
access to the physical world and the astral world. When we are awake we are in
the conscious state of mind and relate mostly to the atomic level of existence
( this level of physical reality that we can see with our eyeballs). In the
sleep state or sub-conscious state of mind we have a different level of
awareness state of mind. If we can become conscious in the sub-conscious we can
have free will in a higher mental state or "Qi" state.
Some people experience an out of body astral projection. This is where the
sub-sub-sub-sub particles that make up your astral body reach a composite state
and can leave the physical body. We are still connected although to the
physical body if we are still alive in the physical body. So I would say a
little space-time worm hole field designs free willed transport destination and
we then astral project out into another location. Then as we begin to awake,
the mind generates a field that brings us back to our body and closes the
little mind generated worm hole.
When people die I think this astral body permanently leaves our physical
body and this astral body ( or soul) goes to places we have believed to exist
such as heaven or the world we imagined or possibly reincarnation or ....???
This is a very open field of possibilities.
I think the best choice for the astral body ( or soul) would be to go to
Heaven, where the New Universe is located.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

  #9  
Old October 1st 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Smart1234,

I think some of your ideas are very colored by your belief in the
Christian God. You may have a point about Qi being sub-sub-sub-sub
particles (subject to more reseach and experimentations on the exact
physics of it) but your idea about the New Universe stems from your
belief in the Christian God. Right? Don't take the Bible so literally.
For example. Just as an example. Suppose the world suffers near
nuclear annihilation or asteroid impact in 2030 and 90% of humans die.
And supposing the leader that rise up is a supporter of Saddam. He and
the other supporters of Saddam would slowly structure society to
their belief and faith. So children in 2200 A.D. would be taught for
example that Saddam is God and the Lord of the Universe. See the
logic or illogic of it?? Jehovah can be like Saddam too. So don't
use blind faith and emotion to direct your mind. Anyway. I have
to use a lot of filtering to get what you are conveying in terms
of pure technical reasoning and emotional ones (your to the max
Christian faith and ideas deeply colored by it)

c


ok
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


  #10  
Old October 3rd 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Mark Palenik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 855
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect


"cinquirer" wrote in message
m...
Smart1234,

I think some of your ideas are very colored by your belief in the
Christian God. You may have a point about Qi being sub-sub-sub-sub
particles (subject to more reseach and experimentations on the exact
physics of it) but your idea about the New Universe stems from your
belief in the Christian God. Right? Don't take the Bible so literally.
For example. Just as an example. Suppose the world suffers near
nuclear annihilation or asteroid impact in 2030 and 90% of humans die.
And supposing the leader that rise up is a supporter of Saddam. He and
the other supporters of Saddam would slowly structure society to
their belief and faith. So children in 2200 A.D. would be taught for
example that Saddam is God and the Lord of the Universe. See the
logic or illogic of it?? Jehovah can be like Saddam too. So don't
use blind faith and emotion to direct your mind. Anyway. I have
to use a lot of filtering to get what you are conveying in terms
of pure technical reasoning and emotional ones (your to the max
Christian faith and ideas deeply colored by it)

c


You should be one to talk, Qi boy.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Newbies : The Smart Model is the first correct model of atoms... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 December 4th 03 07:18 AM
Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 3 September 25th 03 05:41 PM
If The Smart Model is Correct... S. Enterprize Company Physics - New Theories 8 July 16th 03 12:22 AM
If The Smart Model is Correct... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 1 July 15th 03 10:57 AM
If The Smart Model is Correct... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 5 July 13th 03 04:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Cards - Car Loan - Cheap Computer Parts - Online Loans - MPAA