![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: correct, further, incorrect, model, proof, smart |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect
http://hipe.uia.ac.be/cmt/atom.html Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom. This animation shows that like particles DO repel each other. In the QM model of the atom, used with the Periodic Table of Elements, there can be hundreds of "like charged" electrons in the orbitals. But as they run into each other and repel, or as other FREE ELECTRONS collide with the electrons in the QM orbitals, YOU CAN SEE ( with your own eyes) that the orbitals become even MORE chaotic and NOT a nice looking orbital field, like an s orbital or p and so on, predicted by the QM model. The Smart Model DOES NOT USE this nonsense of orbital electron fields. The fields it uses is the Aether Fluid ( sub-sub-partcles) that spin in an INTELLIGENT CREATED structural angular momentum field or Helix Spiral Field ( vortex field) that forms each sub-particle. Then each sub-particle interacts directly, as The Smart Model Theory shows. There is a direct stable interaction between each electron with the neutrino and proton, per atom of an element. The atomic structures observed in REAL atomic images ARE showing that the Smart Model predictions ARE correct in regard to element structure. If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the chemical level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each other in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java animation. You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on earth today. Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect
http://hipe.uia.ac.be/cmt/atom.html Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom. This animation shows that like particles DO repel each other. In the QM model of the atom, used with the Periodic Table of Elements, there can be hundreds of "like charged" electrons in the orbitals. But as they run into each other and repel, or as other FREE ELECTRONS collide with the electrons in the QM orbitals, YOU CAN SEE ( with your own eyes) that the orbitals become even MORE chaotic and NOT a nice looking orbital field, like an s orbital or p and so on, predicted by the QM model. The Smart Model DOES NOT USE this nonsense of orbital electron fields. The fields it uses is the Aether Fluid ( sub-sub-partcles) that spin in an INTELLIGENT CREATED structural angular momentum field or Helix Spiral Field ( vortex field) that forms each sub-particle. Then each sub-particle interacts directly, as The Smart Model Theory shows. There is a direct stable interaction between each electron with the neutrino and proton, per atom of an element. The atomic structures observed in REAL atomic images ARE showing that the Smart Model predictions ARE correct in regard to element structure. If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the chemical level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each other in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java animation. You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on earth today. And as soon as the world realizes that The Smart Model was correct for all the years and years and years, while Smart1234 was made to look like a fool, a stupid idiot, rejected, hated, put through HELL on earth, and damned by people trying to control him and his mind, by trying take away his free will to live peacefully and to do good things and charity to help others and science and physics, don't forget to add your donations of 10% per profit of each new re-written book in the entire world, for all future generations. This will assist me in ALL my HARD work I DID in physics in this world. And it should make me a multi-trillionaire. I could even buy most of this planet eventually. Oh but of course it would then be transferred to The Lord for His good pleasure. The True and Faithful Owner of this planet and universe, Who is, was and shall be, One with The Creator, God ( The Heavenly Father). Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Smart1234. The Smart Model can be a good candidate of being the
"most correct model on earth" (as you implied) if it can describe Qi and all its behavior. What do you think of the following described by an expert on Qi. Pls. try to describe it thru the Smart Model (I'll give my personal validation of it afterwards). "Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril, orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to "angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric "angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological "positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position (i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the - given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly "within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent micro-boundaries." ----------- Some may say that the above is a string of high sounding words that attempted to convey knowledge though not based on reality. But if you will analyze it carefully. It appears the person is seriously studying qi as he made many points that can only confirmed by personal experience. The following is the properties of Qi as I directly experience it and others may do their own investigation (I'm categorically certain of the existence of Qi from extensive investigations and hands-on with it): 1. Qi is interactive with geometrical form (for example, Triangular shape can focus it, especially when a group of it are combined such as in a pyramid structure. Remember some decades back when pyramid cardboard box are reported to sharpen razor (maybe something to do with crystalline structure reorganization although I haven't tried any razor testing so can't vouch for the validity of this). But if you put your hand inside a cardboard pyramid. You can feel qi focusing densely on your hand or seers can see the increased energy field inside of it). 2. Qi is not just a property of physical matter but also function in the astral, mental and causal field (as esoterically defined by many traditional schools and directly perceived by practitioners). For example. The spleen chakra digests planetary qi, but other chakras absorb more of astral qi than planetary qi. 3. Personal Qi is non-local such as when affecting other bioplasmic body at a distance (used in distance healing, etc.) etc. Before I go. Let me mention the following again (pls read it anew carefully): "Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril, orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to "angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric "angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological "positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position (i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the - given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly "within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent micro-boundaries." c (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message ... Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect http://hipe.uia.ac.be/cmt/atom.html Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom. This animation shows that like particles DO repel each other. In the QM model of the atom, used with the Periodic Table of Elements, there can be hundreds of "like charged" electrons in the orbitals. But as they run into each other and repel, or as other FREE ELECTRONS collide with the electrons in the QM orbitals, YOU CAN SEE ( with your own eyes) that the orbitals become even MORE chaotic and NOT a nice looking orbital field, like an s orbital or p and so on, predicted by the QM model. The Smart Model DOES NOT USE this nonsense of orbital electron fields. The fields it uses is the Aether Fluid ( sub-sub-partcles) that spin in an INTELLIGENT CREATED structural angular momentum field or Helix Spiral Field ( vortex field) that forms each sub-particle. Then each sub-particle interacts directly, as The Smart Model Theory shows. There is a direct stable interaction between each electron with the neutrino and proton, per atom of an element. The atomic structures observed in REAL atomic images ARE showing that the Smart Model predictions ARE correct in regard to element structure. If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the chemical level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each other in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java animation. You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on earth today. And as soon as the world realizes that The Smart Model was correct for all the years and years and years, while Smart1234 was made to look like a fool, a stupid idiot, rejected, hated, put through HELL on earth, and damned by people trying to control him and his mind, by trying take away his free will to live peacefully and to do good things and charity to help others and science and physics, don't forget to add your donations of 10% per profit of each new re-written book in the entire world, for all future generations. This will assist me in ALL my HARD work I DID in physics in this world. And it should make me a multi-trillionaire. I could even buy most of this planet eventually. Oh but of course it would then be transferred to The Lord for His good pleasure. The True and Faithful Owner of this planet and universe, Who is, was and shall be, One with The Creator, God ( The Heavenly Father). Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Smart1234. The Smart Model can be a good candidate of being the
"most correct model on earth" (as you implied) if it can describe Qi and all its behavior. What do you think of the following described by an expert on Qi. Pls. try to describe it thru the Smart Model (I'll give my personal validation of it afterwards). "Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril, orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to "angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric "angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological "positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position (i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the - given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly "within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent micro-boundaries." ----------- Some may say that the above is a string of high sounding words that attempted to convey knowledge though not based on reality. But if you will analyze it carefully. It appears the person is seriously studying qi as he made many points that can only confirmed by personal experience. The following is the properties of Qi as I directly experience it and others may do their own investigation (I'm categorically certain of the existence of Qi from extensive investigations and hands-on with it): 1. Qi is interactive with geometrical form (for example, Triangular shape can focus it, especially when a group of it are combined such as in a pyramid structure. Remember some decades back when pyramid cardboard box are reported to sharpen razor (maybe something to do with crystalline structure reorganization although I haven't tried any razor testing so can't vouch for the validity of this). But if you put your hand inside a cardboard pyramid. You can feel qi focusing densely on your hand or seers can see the increased energy field inside of it). 2. Qi is not just a property of physical matter but also function in the astral, mental and causal field (as esoterically defined by many traditional schools and directly perceived by practitioners). For example. The spleen chakra digests planetary qi, but other chakras absorb more of astral qi than planetary qi. 3. Personal Qi is non-local such as when affecting other bioplasmic body at a distance (used in distance healing, etc.) etc. Before I go. Let me mention the following again (pls read it anew carefully): "Qi = geometrized energy-patterns coded into and in'forming' the etheric-physical field, the astral-etheric field, the astral and mental fields etc. "Qi" is the generic Chinese term, used here in preference of others owing to its familiarity even in the West corresponding roughly to what has otherwise been known as vril, orgone, wakkan, od or odic force, ch'i, prana, azoth, subtle energy and magnetic fluid; depending on the given plane, state or density in which the qi occurs, it may take on various forms a nd serve differing functions according to ideotypal, psychic, psycho-emotional or vital requirements. It is not the same as the ether but encodes infrastructure patterns of ether, which, according to "angle-of-propagation" and overall waveform of the latter tend to align, organize and preferentially orient the geometric sub-components of enfolded qi-states (thus exfolding them with reference to the guiding ideotype of the cognitive grid network imparting etheric "angle" in the first place). Through the resultant guideline of perspectival coordinates they "migrate" to strategic ontological "positions" undergirding stress-tensor states of subatomic field patterns and magnetogravitic, phase-space topologies. Such qi influstructures are themselves without "size" or "physical' position (i.e. with respect to atomic coordinates to the limits of indeterminacy) though their ontological "angles" and "edges" orient relative size and respective position of point-fields by gauge adjustments according to compensatory symme tries required of the - given - perspective. The Qi Patterns themselves are reiterative and holonomic. Therefore while they may "appear" to reside strictly "within" the coordinative limits of the overall field geometry (as with E8 x E8 gauge group) either when evidentially reconstituted or occultly "perceived", they are arbitrarily "expansive" to an indeterminate degree and range beyond those apparent micro-boundaries." c I think the "Qi" would apply to the Smart Model this way. First we have to show the relationship between the mind ( imaginary part) and Reality. I called it, "Smart's Proposed Law of Existence" Imagination ( mind) + Power ( work/time) = Reality An example of how it works is like this. Remember the Wright Brothers? They imagined or had the idea that they could fly. They then applied work per time ( power) to it and it eventually became reality. Then as others applied more power to it, we obtained even better ways to fly ( jets, etc...) The "Qi" at the Smart Model sub-atomic level would be something like this. We are made of atoms at the physical level. Then these atoms are made of particles and particles are made of sub-particles, and sub-particles are made of sub-sub-particles ( Aether) and sub-sub-particles are made of sub-sub-sub-particles which are unifying field particles that provide a balance between the forces of large with small in this universe. These fields operate naturally and automatically, set up first by The Creator, God. Where do we come in at, as animate beings? The particles shown up to this point can be regarded as inanimate and regulate the physical universe as we know it. There is an additional field of particles that are called, sub-sub-sub-sub spiritual ( "Qi") particles. These particles act independently BUT with the physical universe. And they are located in the mind and soul ( or spirit) of each person. These particles allow for consciousness, life, faith, hope, love a higher level of intelligence other than an animal and allow for our FREE WILL to move at will and where we want to move. Animals move instinctively, but we can move where we want to by our free will. The mind has different levels of access to the physical world and the astral world. When we are awake we are in the conscious state of mind and relate mostly to the atomic level of existence ( this level of physical reality that we can see with our eyeballs). In the sleep state or sub-conscious state of mind we have a different level of awareness state of mind. If we can become conscious in the sub-conscious we can have free will in a higher mental state or "Qi" state. Some people experience an out of body astral projection. This is where the sub-sub-sub-sub particles that make up your astral body reach a composite state and can leave the physical body. We are still connected although to the physical body if we are still alive in the physical body. So I would say a little space-time worm hole field designs free willed transport destination and we then astral project out into another location. Then as we begin to awake, the mind generates a field that brings us back to our body and closes the little mind generated worm hole. When people die I think this astral body permanently leaves our physical body and this astral body ( or soul) goes to places we have believed to exist such as heaven or the world we imagined or possibly reincarnation or ....??? This is a very open field of possibilities. I think the best choice for the astral body ( or soul) would be to go to Heaven, where the New Universe is located. Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom. You are really bloody stupid aren't you? Others and I have told you hundreds of times that you CANNOT SEE ORBITALS. They are not a physical entity - they are a probability distribution. You simply do not understand quantum mechanics and have no knowledge of it whatsoever, so don't claim it is wrong until you have studied it. If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the chemical level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each other in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java animation. Totally stupid. Read the title: "Two Dimensional Classical Atom". Classical atom yes? Not quantum. The whole reason we came up with a quantum theory of the atom is because the classical model doesn't work! You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on earth today. No it's not you sad deluded moron with a Messianic complex. I'm sorry to start insulting you, but you keep ignoring my points when I'm nice to you; perhaps this way some of it will stick. I certainly find most of your points offensive - to humankind, intelligence, common sense and reason. Kev |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode
java animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom. You are really bloody stupid aren't you? Others and I have told you hundreds of times that you CANNOT SEE ORBITALS. They are not a physical entity - they are a probability distribution. You simply do not understand quantum mechanics and have no knowledge of it whatsoever, so don't claim it is wrong until you have studied it. If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the chemical level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each other in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java animation. Totally stupid. Read the title: "Two Dimensional Classical Atom". Classical atom yes? Not quantum. The whole reason we came up with a quantum theory of the atom is because the classical model doesn't work! You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on earth today. No it's not you sad deluded moron with a Messianic complex. I'm sorry to start insulting you, but you keep ignoring my points when I'm nice to you; perhaps this way some of it will stick. I certainly find most of your points offensive - to humankind, intelligence, common sense and reason. Kev You sound like you've had a bad day. I hope things get better for you. I wish you well. But, a probability distribution of WHAT????? electrons. Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message ... Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom. You are really bloody stupid aren't you? Others and I have told you hundreds of times that you CANNOT SEE ORBITALS. They are not a physical entity - they are a probability distribution. You simply do not understand quantum mechanics and have no knowledge of it whatsoever, so don't claim it is wrong until you have studied it. If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the chemical level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each other in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java animation. Totally stupid. Read the title: "Two Dimensional Classical Atom". Classical atom yes? Not quantum. The whole reason we came up with a quantum theory of the atom is because the classical model doesn't work! You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on earth today. No it's not you sad deluded moron with a Messianic complex. I'm sorry to start insulting you, but you keep ignoring my points when I'm nice to you; perhaps this way some of it will stick. I certainly find most of your points offensive - to humankind, intelligence, common sense and reason. Kev You sound like you've had a bad day. I hope things get better for you. I wish you well. But, a probability distribution of WHAT????? electrons. Of *electron*, and electron, as in one. There aren't a bunch of electrons scattered around in the approximate shape of an orbital. An orbital can be thought of as a region where an electron is likely to be, if we choose to look for it. Of course, that's a bit of oversimplification, but it gets the basic idea across. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Smart1234,
I think some of your ideas are very colored by your belief in the Christian God. You may have a point about Qi being sub-sub-sub-sub particles (subject to more reseach and experimentations on the exact physics of it) but your idea about the New Universe stems from your belief in the Christian God. Right? Don't take the Bible so literally. For example. Just as an example. Suppose the world suffers near nuclear annihilation or asteroid impact in 2030 and 90% of humans die. And supposing the leader that rise up is a supporter of Saddam. He and the other supporters of Saddam would slowly structure society to their belief and faith. So children in 2200 A.D. would be taught for example that Saddam is God and the Lord of the Universe. See the logic or illogic of it?? Jehovah can be like Saddam too. So don't use blind faith and emotion to direct your mind. Anyway. I have to use a lot of filtering to get what you are conveying in terms of pure technical reasoning and emotional ones (your to the max Christian faith and ideas deeply colored by it) c ok Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"cinquirer" wrote in message m... Smart1234, I think some of your ideas are very colored by your belief in the Christian God. You may have a point about Qi being sub-sub-sub-sub particles (subject to more reseach and experimentations on the exact physics of it) but your idea about the New Universe stems from your belief in the Christian God. Right? Don't take the Bible so literally. For example. Just as an example. Suppose the world suffers near nuclear annihilation or asteroid impact in 2030 and 90% of humans die. And supposing the leader that rise up is a supporter of Saddam. He and the other supporters of Saddam would slowly structure society to their belief and faith. So children in 2200 A.D. would be taught for example that Saddam is God and the Lord of the Universe. See the logic or illogic of it?? Jehovah can be like Saddam too. So don't use blind faith and emotion to direct your mind. Anyway. I have to use a lot of filtering to get what you are conveying in terms of pure technical reasoning and emotional ones (your to the max Christian faith and ideas deeply colored by it) c You should be one to talk, Qi boy. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| For Newbies : The Smart Model is the first correct model of atoms... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | December 4th 03 07:18 AM |
| Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | September 25th 03 05:41 PM |
| If The Smart Model is Correct... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - New Theories | 8 | July 16th 03 12:22 AM |
| If The Smart Model is Correct... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | July 15th 03 10:57 AM |
| If The Smart Model is Correct... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | July 13th 03 04:53 AM |