![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: property, space, time |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cut and paste from my previous posts:
Particle move in space and time is the ratio of motions between this particle and the reference motion represented by instruments like clocks. There is all the evidence that space exist. There is no connection between space and time that means that one has no physical influence on the other. The definition of space does not exist if there are no objects of matter. The definition of time does not exist if there is no motion of matter in space. Space has no shape or dimension only the object of matter in space have dimensions and shapes. Bending is a process describing the change of geometrical shape of a material object. Bending of space is impossible because ones again the space have no shape or dimension. All statements above where proven true in physical experiments. My definition of time states that time is only a ration of motion of objects of matter. My definition of time is based on physical evidence and only defines the practical scientific aspect of it that can be measured with physical instruments and can be proven in a physical experiment. The geometric time definition only exists if the geometry of the matter is changing and does not state that time is a ratio of motion. Feather more there is the only one way of measuring what is called the time and that is the way of measuring the ratio of motion. All clocking devices which represent the reference motion are based on periodic motion of matter (particles or waves). The property of matter that cannot be measured or detected has only a philosophical or metaphysical application. I do not tolerate fallacy! Physics are about properties of reality! If you say that there exist a property of space that you call space-time than if you do not provide physical evidence of that property. Than I will immediately call you theory FALSE or Sci-Fi. Sincerely, ps. My theory of relativity: Everything in the universe is relative! My definition of time: Time is a ratio of motions and is always measured as such, ratio between measured and reference motions. The reference motions are periodic (pendulums clocks) or linear (predictable displacements). Example: I walk 5m while clocks pendulum swings 3 times(periodic reference). I walk 3m while 1kg weight falls down from the height of 1m at see level at 20deg centigrade etc.(predictable displacement reference) Time is a method of measuring or synchronizing motions. Anything else is Sci-Fi! The has not been a single experiment proving that static fields of any know kind can propagate. Propagation of any static field can only be done by moving its source. The source of gravity always contains matter in forms of atoms it exits with the matter and it can be controlled by changing the densities of the matter. Changes in gravity detected on the earth are the results of planetary motions in the universe not by propagation of the gravity field. The precision clocks (reference periodic motion counters) are based on counting periodic motion of the electrons in specially chosen atoms. Which means that they are affected by gravity and gravity forces differ with the altitude change above the earth. Saying that time goes slower is correct since in my definition time is a ratio of motions not a constant derive from c. The space and matter in its various form exists, but the definition of time only exists if there is matter in motion. Every atom in the universe has it own gravity field. Well, if you build your theory on definition used in existing theories, than that means that you are attempting to modify an or improve the existing ones. The existing theories your are creating your vocabulary based up on, have faults and lack of experimental prove, so your modified theories will carry on the unreliable and unproven elements. The new theories should be based on prime definition and proven in physical experiments. Your asking to agree with your statements may result in endless waste of time. So let's present new and solid theories instead and have discussions about them! When you try to measure time than you will notice that all you are doing is measuring a ratio of motions! No motion, no time can be measured. Assumption of nonexistent property. Clocks do not keep time. They count repetitive motion. There is no definition of "proper time". Simple, it is repetitive motion. And time is a ratio of motion, so to measure the repetitive motion of the first clock we use the count of more grainer motion. The same applies to distance between the marks on given rule, one uses the more grainer ruler and so on. And this metrology logic is several thousand years old. Now since we know what clock do, maybe now you can define the "proper time"? There is a hierahical existence of definitions and that is: Definition of space exists only if there are objects of matter. Definition of time exists if there is motion of matter. Definition of space distance exists if there is a ratio of size of objects of matter. And so on... No, motion passes in ratio of time. Time is a method and not a property of space. We measure time by comparing reference motion to measured motion. Examples: I walk 3m (measured motion) while clock swings his pendulum 2 times (reference motion). I walk 1.2m (measured motion) while weight of 1kg drops down from height of 1m at sea level and 20deg centigrade temperature (reference motion).. For practical reasons humans agreed to use period motion as a reference motion. We use planetary periodic motion and its subdivisions (day, hour,sec etc..) as the reference motion for measuring and or synchronizing motions. As an engineer I describe your time in the following way: Time is a reference count for synchronizing the human motion. Clocks are the mechanisms of distributing the reference count. Distributed reference count allow people and machines to move synchronously. Finally clocks do not measure time(time is the method) but count periodic motion. "What time it is?" people and machines are asking when they choose to find if and when their motion is out of phase. Connecting time with the space has no useful practical porpoise. Space-time is a word invented by GTR inventers and despite wishful thinking, it does not alter the motion of the matter. Sincerely, Mathew Orman www.ultra-faster-than-light.com www.radio-faster-than-light.com |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mathew Orman wrote:
Space has no shape or dimension only the object of matter in space have dimensions and shapes. Bending of space is impossible because ones again the space have no shape or dimension. In classical logic, the above is known as petitio principii. -- cheers, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Mathew Orman wrote: Space has no shape or dimension only the object of matter in space have dimensions and shapes. Bending of space is impossible because ones again the space have no shape or dimension. In classical logic, the above is known as petitio principii. -- cheers, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- I call it *prime definition* Sincerely, Mathew Orman www.ultra-faster-than-light.com www.radio-faster-than-light.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mathew Orman wrote:
I call it *prime definition* My Mother beat you to it. She said "God exists and is the cause of everything." How's that for a *prime definition*? -- cheers, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Mathew Orman wrote: I call it *prime definition* My Mother beat you to it. She said "God exists and is the cause of everything." How's that for a *prime definition*? -- cheers, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- It is very good. But than we ask: what is the cause of God? Sincerely, Mathew Orman www.ultra-faster-than-light.com www.radio-faster-than-light.com |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mathew Orman wrote:
It is very good. But than we ask: what is the cause of God? Good question, but then we ask: What is the cause of your prime definition? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Mathew Orman wrote: It is very good. But than we ask: what is the cause of God? Good question, but then we ask: What is the cause of your prime definition? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- But than we are back to previous question ![]() Sincerely, Mathew Orman www.ultra-faster-than-light.com www.radio-faster-than-light.com |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Time is much more important than space. Spacetime contracts in the
direction of an accelerating object. Bert |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Time is much more important than space. Spacetime contracts in the direction of an accelerating object. Bert I wish it was true. Sincerely, Mathew Orman www.ultra-faster-than-light.com www.radio-faster-than-light.com |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
... Time is much more important than space. I disagree. Without space what is time? Without time what is space? Spacetime contracts in the direction of an accelerating object. Bert I wish it was true. Sincerely, Mathew Orman Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Time is a Property of Matter? | Mitchell | Physics - General Discussion | 27 | November 28th 04 03:55 PM |
| Time is a Property of Matter? | Mitchell | The Theory of Relativity | 27 | November 28th 04 03:55 PM |
| Time is not a property of space............................................................................................................................. | Mathew Orman | Physics - General Discussion | 27 | October 4th 03 10:14 PM |
| Time is not a property of space............................................................................................................................. | Mathew Orman | Electromagnetic Theory and Applications | 16 | October 4th 03 10:14 PM |
| Still no single experiment showing property of space that limits motion of matter.................................................... | Old Man | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | July 25th 03 09:33 PM |