CP violation has been observed. And the Standard Model as well. Now if you
insists that the sky is not blue but pink with green little elephants, there
is nothing to say...

It has been observed if you observe the WRONG atomic model. The Standard
Model doesn't include a sub-structure at the internal sub-atomic level, The
Smart Model does.

The Standard Model is a primitive model. It's like saying a grain of salt is
the smallest particle there is, and it has no internal molecular structure. So
if you break it up, you never get the same amount of smaller pieces. So there
is a parity violation with a grain of salt.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message
...
CP violation has been observed. And the Standard Model as well. Now if
you
insists that the sky is not blue but pink with green little elephants,
there
is nothing to say...

It has been observed if you observe the WRONG atomic model. The
Standard
Model doesn't include a sub-structure at the internal sub-atomic level,
The
Smart Model does.

The Standard Model is a primitive model. It's like saying a grain of
salt is
the smallest particle there is, and it has no internal molecular
structure. So
if you break it up, you never get the same amount of smaller pieces. So
there
is a parity violation with a grain of salt.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/



You might write scientific-like, but obviously you have no clue about
science, and particle physics in particular. This might sound good in a
Hollywood blockbuster but it is not science. Standard model is a robust
theory. In fact it is the most complete theory that humanity has ever
constructed. And is backed up by experimental data. It is time you face
reality.

Kostas.

"Constantine" wrote in message
...

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message
...
CP violation has been observed. And the Standard Model as well. Now if
you
insists that the sky is not blue but pink with green little elephants,
there
is nothing to say...

It has been observed if you observe the WRONG atomic model. The
Standard
Model doesn't include a sub-structure at the internal sub-atomic level,
The
Smart Model does.

The Standard Model is a primitive model. It's like saying a grain of
salt is
the smallest particle there is, and it has no internal molecular
structure. So
if you break it up, you never get the same amount of smaller pieces. So
there
is a parity violation with a grain of salt.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/



You might write scientific-like, but obviously you have no clue about
science, and particle physics in particular. This might sound good in a
Hollywood blockbuster but it is not science. Standard model is a robust
theory. In fact it is the most complete theory that humanity has ever
constructed. And is backed up by experimental data. It is time you face
reality.

Kostas.


Don't waste your breath, Kostas. He's been spouting this crap for years and
still refuses to listen to reason.

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message
...
CP violation has been observed. And the Standard Model as well. Now if
you
insists that the sky is not blue but pink with green little elephants,
there
is nothing to say...

It has been observed if you observe the WRONG atomic model. The
Standard
Model doesn't include a sub-structure at the internal sub-atomic level,
The
Smart Model does.

The Standard Model is a primitive model. It's like saying a grain of
salt is
the smallest particle there is, and it has no internal molecular
structure. So
if you break it up, you never get the same amount of smaller pieces. So
there
is a parity violation with a grain of salt.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/



You might write scientific-like, but obviously you have no clue about
science, and particle physics in particular. This might sound good in a
Hollywood blockbuster but it is not science. Standard model is a robust
theory. In fact it is the most complete theory that humanity has ever
constructed. And is backed up by experimental data. It is time you face
reality.

Kostas.


But even your own Standard Model questions if there is a sub-structure to
sub-particles. And I show that there is. So why do my thoeries have to look
like something that should be shown as science fiction?


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/