A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - New Theories
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

From other New group... Interesting discussion... Smart1234



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 14th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics.new-theories
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default From other New group... Interesting discussion... Smart1234

In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company

wrote
on 13 Jul 2003 10:05:58 GMT
:
In sci.physics, S. Enterprize Company

wrote
on 11 Jul 2003 04:04:40 GMT
:
" Since Einstein said that
' God does not play dice with the universe . ' ,

And God doesn't make up equations like

E = mc^2

showing us that mass can move at the speed of light.

Actually, sqrt(2) the speed of light. But that would be
a ridiculously naive interpretation of this formula.

E = mc^2 = 1/2 m v^2
1/2 v^2 = c^2
v^2 = 2c^2
v = sqrt(2) c

[.sigsnip]


c can't be reached. E=mc^2 is wrong to start with. So your relation is
wrong.

E = 1/2 mv^2

v--- c

v =\= c


The equation is wrong anyway; it only works for v c.


and mass is constant, not relativistic.


Tell that to the muon.



Listen you muon, your mass remains constant, your helix spiral field spin
angular momentum increases which accounts for the extra energy.

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ProtonAccelerated.jpg





m_final = m_initial/ ( sqrt ( 1- v^2/c^2))

is wrong.

if v = c

m_final X 0 = m_initial

m_initial = 0

This is goofy. This isn't even wrong.


Misapplication. A mass can't accelerate to lightspeed,
no matter how much energy is thrown at it.



That's right so you can't say E = mc^2 mass can never reach c, so how is it
going to be transformed to energy at the speed of light.


We could make an electron weigh as much as a four-door
sedan (from our vantagepoint) and it wouldn't be moving
at lightspeed. (It would pack quite a whallop to whatever
it hits, though!)

[.sigsnip]


Just because energy-momentum increases in a particle accelerator near the
speed of light, doesn't mean mass is increasing.

p = mv

m is constant.

Look again, spin angular speed increases in rotational energy of a particle.
It is the main cause of energy increase.

KE = 1/2 m v^2

where v--- c is only a small amount of energy for a very small particle

The increase of energy in particle accelerators is the Smart Model (vortex)
Helix Spiral Field of that particle, as it is accelerated near light speed.
Mass is NOT relativistic. Mass is constant at all times even near the speed of
light.

In fact, high energy particles in the gamma range of the EM spectrum move
near the speed of light. This frequency is in the 10^23 Hz range. Frequency can
be converted to angular speed by

2pi f = omega -- angular rotational speed

I used this angular speed in the gamma range to show that the same energy
"they" are getting is the same thing I show for particle accelerators. See
link again above. Even at rest energy...

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ProtonAtRest.jpg


I even took the proton theoretically to the speed of light and beyond in
energy near the energy of the Big Bang, and mass STILL remains constant, it's
just an increase of rotational energy level with a change in radius size of the
helix spiral field. The field is stretched. Size and time is relativistic, NOT
mass.

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ProtonBeyond3.jpg


S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smarts Integration --- From Another News Group ( Interesting) S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 1 December 11th 03 06:29 PM
An interesting post from another News Group on "Qi" and The Smart Model S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 September 27th 03 04:21 AM
Is there a Technical Physics Discussion Group David Union Physics - General Discussion 2 September 8th 03 09:44 AM
Slightly Off Topic But Interesting - Einstein Played Violin - Smart1234 Plays A Little Jass S. Enterprize Company Physics - New Theories 13 June 29th 03 03:35 AM
Slightly Off Topic But Interesting - Einstein Played Violin - Smart1234 Plays A Little Jass S. Enterprize Company Physics - New Theories 0 June 28th 03 09:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Dan brown - Ringtones - Pay Day Loans - Debt Help - Loan