On Feb 6, 5:14*pm, BURT wrote:
On Feb 5, 9:35*pm, jdawe wrote:





Just a reminder that:

mass is opposing energy\matter.

To talk about:

mass–energy equivalence

Is to talk about:

matter - solid equivalence

force - push equivalence

temperature - cold equivalence

energy - kinetic equivalence

space - distance equivalence

humankind - male equivalence

Therefore, when we talk about an opposing operation like 'mass' we
must always speak of:

mass = energy + matter

matter = solids + fluids

force = push + pull

temperature = hot + cold

energy *= potential + kinetic

space = time + distance

humankind = male + female

Thanks,

-Josh.

Mass weighs but there is another form of energy that doesn't.

Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Which of the 2 forms of energy are not affected by force?

Potential or Kinetic?

-Josh.

Dear jdawe:

On Feb 7, 11:18*pm, jdawe wrote:
On Feb 7, 4:19*am, dlzc wrote:

On Feb 5, 10:35*pm, jdawe wrote:

Just a reminder that:

Your "bifurcation" problem has to do with your
brain, not Nature. "Adam" was charged with
naming things, and this created the binary
issues you seem to see in Nature around you. *

Rock vs. not rock, etc.

The opposite of rock ( solid ) is fluid.

No, the rock under your feet *is* fluid. If you knew anything about
geology...

David A. Smith

On Feb 7, 10:48*pm, jdawe wrote:
On Feb 6, 5:14*pm, BURT wrote:





On Feb 5, 9:35*pm, jdawe wrote:

Just a reminder that:

mass is opposing energy\matter.

To talk about:

mass–energy equivalence

Is to talk about:

matter - solid equivalence

force - push equivalence

temperature - cold equivalence

energy - kinetic equivalence

space - distance equivalence

humankind - male equivalence

Therefore, when we talk about an opposing operation like 'mass' we
must always speak of:

mass = energy + matter

matter = solids + fluids

force = push + pull

temperature = hot + cold

energy *= potential + kinetic

space = time + distance

humankind = male + female

Thanks,

-Josh.

Mass weighs but there is another form of energy that doesn't.

Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Which of the 2 forms of energy are not affected by force?

Potential or Kinetic?

-Josh.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Finite density of energy does not gravitate or weigh but it does of
course freefall.

Mitch Raemsch

On Feb 9, 1:22*am, dlzc wrote:
Dear jdawe:

On Feb 7, 11:18*pm, jdawe wrote:

On Feb 7, 4:19*am, dlzc wrote:

On Feb 5, 10:35*pm, jdawe wrote:

Just a reminder that:

Your "bifurcation" problem has to do with your
brain, not Nature. *"Adam" was charged with
naming things, and this created the binary
issues you seem to see in Nature around you. *

Rock vs. not rock, etc.

The opposite of rock ( solid ) is fluid.

No, the rock under your feet *is* fluid. *If you knew anything about
geology...

David A. Smith

All rocks are solids and if 'geology' views rocks as fluid then I
count myself lucky for not knowing anything about geology.

-Josh.

On Feb 9, 6:12*am, BURT wrote:
On Feb 7, 10:48*pm, jdawe wrote:





On Feb 6, 5:14*pm, BURT wrote:

On Feb 5, 9:35*pm, jdawe wrote:

Just a reminder that:

mass is opposing energy\matter.

To talk about:

mass–energy equivalence

Is to talk about:

matter - solid equivalence

force - push equivalence

temperature - cold equivalence

energy - kinetic equivalence

space - distance equivalence

humankind - male equivalence

Therefore, when we talk about an opposing operation like 'mass' we
must always speak of:

mass = energy + matter

matter = solids + fluids

force = push + pull

temperature = hot + cold

energy *= potential + kinetic

space = time + distance

humankind = male + female

Thanks,

-Josh.

Mass weighs but there is another form of energy that doesn't.

Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Which of the 2 forms of energy are not affected by force?

Potential or Kinetic?

-Josh.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Finite density of energy does not gravitate or weigh but it does of
course freefall.

Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

When potential\kinetic energy has a density measured as finite it is
not affected by force?

If energy freefalls then it is being affected by pull force.

-josh.

Dear jdawe:

On Feb 8, 6:07*pm, jdawe wrote:
....
All rocks are solids and if 'geology' views
rocks as fluid then I count myself lucky for
not knowing anything about geology.

http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10l.html

You drill a hole deep enough, and the solid rock will essentially pour
back in to fill the hole. And you don't have to go much over a mile
down for this to happen.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,522061,00.html
.... this lump is "pouring" down to the magma beneath.

Be nice if you knew something about rocks, if you were going to claim
knowledge of their opposite.

David A. Smith

On Feb 9, 12:09*pm, dlzc wrote:
Dear jdawe:

On Feb 8, 6:07*pm, jdawe wrote:
...

All rocks are solids and if 'geology' views
rocks as fluid then I count myself lucky for
not knowing anything about geology.

http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10l.html

You drill a hole deep enough, and the solid rock will essentially pour
back in to fill the hole. *And you don't have to go much over a mile
down for this to happen.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,522061,00.html
... this lump is "pouring" down to the magma beneath.

Be nice if you knew something about rocks, if you were going to claim
knowledge of their opposite.

David A. Smith

A solid can invert into a fluid and if it does so it is no longer a
solid.

A rock is a solid if it begins dripping it is inverting into a fluid.

-Josh.

On Feb 8, 6:09*pm, dlzc wrote:
Dear jdawe:

On Feb 8, 6:07*pm, jdawe wrote:
...

All rocks are solids and if 'geology' views
rocks as fluid then I count myself lucky for
not knowing anything about geology.

http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10l.html

You drill a hole deep enough, and the solid rock will essentially pour
back in to fill the hole. *And you don't have to go much over a mile
down for this to happen.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,522061,00.html
... this lump is "pouring" down to the magma beneath.

Be nice if you knew something.

IFYPFY.


Mark L. Fergerson