![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: anthropic, god, principle, relativistic |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:41:02 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote: George Hammond wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:27 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)" wrote: George Hammond wrote: On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:33:49 -0700, doug doug@none wrote: [Hammond] 1. If Man does not exist, then nothing exists. [Doug, unverified Physics PhD claimant] This is an unsupported assumption which is actually what you are trying to prove. Thus your "proof" is DOA. [Hammond] YOU'RE STUPID! The SPOG is a 3 significant figure proven discovery that Psychometric Factor Analysis is CAUSALLY IDENTICAL to Linearized Gravity in Relativity. This is SCIENTIFIC PROOF that Man's "subjective reality" (subjective spacetime) differs by a MAJOR REATIVISTIC CURVATURE from "objective reality" (objective spacetime). This PROVES that the very long standing, indeed ancient, and historically unrefuted "unsupported assumption" you refer to above, is manifestly now a PROVEN FACT. QED, God isscientifically explained and proven. [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] This is just a bunch of word salad. Hammond] Unsupported assertion. Fact is you are SCIENTIFICALLY UNQUALIFIED to even read the above statment because you don't even know what "Psychometry Factor Analysis" is, nor are you aware that there are "3 orthogonal cleaveages of the brain which CAUSE THE 13 "CUBIC" EIGENVECTORS of PSYCHOMETRY. You don't know what you're talking about. [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] There is no content to discuss here. Hammond] Unsupported assertion. The only thing that is "no content" is your post. [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] Your earlier claim that 12=13 certainly is not accurate to 3 significant figures. [Hammond] Never said it that. What I said is that the 13 Factor Analytic eigenvectors that represent the "Olympian Gods" are THEMSELVES MEASURED TO 3 SIGNFICANT FIGURE ACCURACY EXPERIMENTALLY. The fact that there are 13 rather than 12 is irrelevant in that it is only "approximately" known that the Egypto-Greco-Roman pantheon consisted of approximately "a dozen gods". [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] You are making amazingly inconsistent claims. First you are claiming that the christian god is to only one and then you claim to have proof of the number of Greek gods. None of these are real. The egyptian gods are not real. You cannot make any proof about the number of things that are not real. [Hammond] Look you Physics dufus the dozen Egyptian gods are EXACTLY REAL in the same way Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck and Porky Pig are real; they are Personality types that show up as accurately measured EXPERIMENTAL EIGENVECTORS in Psychometry and further turn out to be CUBICALLY CORRELATED. Look .. "Charm, Color, and Strangeness" are REAL because they show up as EIGENVECTORS in Quantum Field Theory, and are experimentally verified. SAME THING IS TRUE OF THE 13 GODS OF THE Egypto-Greco-Roman Pantheon. How many different ways do I have to say it.... you believe particle physics don't you..... guess what..... Religion has been proven in the SAME WAY ( By Hammond (2003)) My claims are spelled out in elaborate detail in my published paper (Noetic Press) a copy of which is posted for your reading convenience at: Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic Press) Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at: http://geocities.com/scientific_proo...ammond5s1.html The exact calculation of the number of "gods" is in section VI: VI Elementary science evidence that the 4th order factor is "God". If you're too lazy to read this ELEMENTARY section of the peer published paper I'm not going to argue with you about "12 or 13 gods". There is no point in arguing with someone who doesn't even know what he's arguing about, just because he wants to argue. snip argumentative no content crap ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] Making statements that are just random and then trying to claim they are somehow proof of something does not fly with anyone, much less any scientists. [Hammond] The US Constitution and Einstein sound like "random words" to totally ignorant, lazy and aggravated people. That doesn't mean they are. Any educated person sees the coherence of the Constitution and scientists understand Einstein. However, your random babble means nothing and is just babble. Fact is, you simply don't know what you're talking about, and could care less.... you're interest doesn't go beyond comparing 12 to 13. You're just another psycho heckler. totally worthless. You really hate it when it is pointed out that you are wrong. I would have thought that you were used to it by now. Has anyone ever agreed with you. [Hammond] Snip rest of psycho drivel. No you left the drivel below still in the post. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
| Ads |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
George Hammond wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:41:02 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)" wrote: George Hammond wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:27 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)" wrote: George Hammond wrote: On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:33:49 -0700, doug doug@none wrote: [Hammond] 1. If Man does not exist, then nothing exists. [Doug, unverified Physics PhD claimant] This is an unsupported assumption which is actually what you are trying to prove. Thus your "proof" is DOA. [Hammond] YOU'RE STUPID! The SPOG is a 3 significant figure proven discovery that Psychometric Factor Analysis is CAUSALLY IDENTICAL to Linearized Gravity in Relativity. This is SCIENTIFIC PROOF that Man's "subjective reality" (subjective spacetime) differs by a MAJOR REATIVISTIC CURVATURE from "objective reality" (objective spacetime). This PROVES that the very long standing, indeed ancient, and historically unrefuted "unsupported assumption" you refer to above, is manifestly now a PROVEN FACT. QED, God isscientifically explained and proven. [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] This is just a bunch of word salad. Hammond] Unsupported assertion. Fact is you are SCIENTIFICALLY UNQUALIFIED to even read the above statment because you don't even know what "Psychometry Factor Analysis" is, nor are you aware that there are "3 orthogonal cleaveages of the brain which CAUSE THE 13 "CUBIC" EIGENVECTORS of PSYCHOMETRY. You don't know what you're talking about. [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] There is no content to discuss here. Hammond] Unsupported assertion. The only thing that is "no content" is your post. [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] Your earlier claim that 12=13 certainly is not accurate to 3 significant figures. [Hammond] Never said it that. What I said is that the 13 Factor Analytic eigenvectors that represent the "Olympian Gods" are THEMSELVES MEASURED TO 3 SIGNFICANT FIGURE ACCURACY EXPERIMENTALLY. The fact that there are 13 rather than 12 is irrelevant in that it is only "approximately" known that the Egypto-Greco-Roman pantheon consisted of approximately "a dozen gods". [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] You are making amazingly inconsistent claims. First you are claiming that the christian god is to only one and then you claim to have proof of the number of Greek gods. None of these are real. The egyptian gods are not real. You cannot make any proof about the number of things that are not real. [Hammond] Look you Physics dufus the dozen Egyptian gods are EXACTLY REAL in the same way Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck and Porky Pig are real; they are Personality types that show up as accurately measured EXPERIMENTAL EIGENVECTORS in Psychometry and further turn out to be CUBICALLY CORRELATED. Look .. "Charm, Color, and Strangeness" are REAL because they show up as EIGENVECTORS in Quantum Field Theory, and are experimentally verified. SAME THING IS TRUE OF THE 13 GODS OF THE Egypto-Greco-Roman Pantheon. Or 12 assuming that the Greeks did not know the difference between 12 and 13 as you have claimed earlier. How many different ways do I have to say it.... you believe particle physics don't you..... guess what..... Religion has been proven in the SAME WAY ( By Hammond (2003)) The only differences being that competent experimenters have confirmed predictions by competent theorists. This is the way science is done. Wild speculation backed only by a mishmash of unrelated babble does not constitute either a theory or a proof of anything. My claims are spelled out in elaborate detail in my published paper (Noetic Press) a copy of which is posted for your reading convenience at: Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic Press) Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at: http://geocities.com/scientific_proo...ammond5s1.html Vanity press does not count as peer reviewed by anyone. I read this long ago and still drag it out occasionally to laugh at. Everyone has enjoyed it as a piece of humor. The exact calculation of the number of "gods" is in section VI: VI Elementary science evidence that the 4th order factor is "God". If you're too lazy to read this ELEMENTARY section of the peer published paper I'm not going to argue with you about "12 or 13 gods". There is no point in arguing with someone who doesn't even know what he's arguing about, just because he wants to argue. This is the most humorous part of your "proof". You want to somehow, with no justification, identify perception of reality as a god. This is pretty bizarre as it comes out of nowhere with no justification and is, in fact, completely opposite to what happens in the real world. The more educated people are, the less they cling to the myths of the religions. Even if it were true, and it is not, you have shown no connection with a god. This is just you hoping that no one will notice that this assuming what you want to prove. snip argumentative no content crap ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] Making statements that are just random and then trying to claim they are somehow proof of something does not fly with anyone, much less any scientists. [Hammond] The US Constitution and Einstein sound like "random words" to totally ignorant, lazy and aggravated people. That doesn't mean they are. Any educated person sees the coherence of the Constitution and scientists understand Einstein. However, your random babble means nothing and is just babble. Fact is, you simply don't know what you're talking about, and could care less.... you're interest doesn't go beyond comparing 12 to 13. You're just another psycho heckler. totally worthless. You really hate it when it is pointed out that you are wrong. I would have thought that you were used to it by now. Has anyone ever agreed with you. [Hammond] Snip rest of psycho drivel. No you left the drivel below still in the post. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
George Hammond wrote:
[snip crap] http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf Dunning-Kruger effect (2000 Ig Nobel Prize): ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge 1) Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of skill. 2) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in others. 3) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
-- http://fast.filespace.org/PaulRMays/Postulate.pdf -- Paul R. Mays "I Believe in Nothing, I Know, I think I Know or I Do Not Know I Never Believe... For to Believe is a Religious Incantation" "Uncle Al" wrote in message ... George Hammond wrote: [snip crap] http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf Dunning-Kruger effect (2000 Ig Nobel Prize): ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge 1) Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of skill. 2) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in others. 3) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy. Well Unky Al.. So you think that may apply to you? -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:49:40 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote: [Hammond] Look you Physics dufus the dozen Egyptian gods are EXACTLY REAL in the same way Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck and Porky Pig are real; they are Personality types that show up as accurately measured EXPERIMENTAL EIGENVECTORS in Psychometry and further turn out to be CUBICALLY CORRELATED. Look .. "Charm, Color, and Strangeness" are REAL because they show up as EIGENVECTORS in Quantum Field Theory, and are experimentally verified. SAME THING IS TRUE OF THE 13 GODS OF THE Egypto-Greco-Roman Pantheon. [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] Or 12 assuming that the Greeks did not know the difference between 12 and 13 as you have claimed earlier. [Hammond] Look, I already told you 3 times, the only EXACT scientific fact is that there are EXACTLY 13-2nd ORDER EIGENVECTORS, extracted by mainframe computers. The ancients didn't know what an eigenvector is, or that the 13-2nd orders are CUBICALLY intercorrelated. Hammond discovered that (1994) They just took an educated guess and called it an even DOZEN (the Greek Dodekatheon so called). They were right to within 7.7%, pretty good for ancient science. So you'll have to find some other trivia to rag on, I've beaten your "12 vs. 13" objection to death. [Hammond] How many different ways do I have to say it.... you believe particle physics don't you..... guess what..... Religion has been proven in the SAME WAY ( By Hammond (2003)) [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] The only differences being that competent experimenters have confirmed predictions by competent theorists. This is the way science is done. Wild speculation backed only by a mishmash of unrelated babble does not constitute either a theory or a proof of anything. [Hammond] 12 is within 92% of 13. This is well within the expected experimental accuracy of historical data. Furthermore, the SPOG predicts EXACTLY 4-3rd order factors, which is 100% ACCURATE, since these are exactly the 4-Gospel Saints ("4-demigods") Matt, Mark, Luke and John. It's becoming painfully apparent that you're an incompetent phony who hasn't even read the paper, doesn't know what it's about, and is simply an aggravated anti-religious psycho. SNIP PHONY INCOMPETENT BULL**** [Hammond] The exact calculation of the number of "gods" is in section VI: VI Elementary science evidence that the 4th order factor is "God". [Hammond] If you're too lazy to read this ELEMENTARY section of the peer published paper I'm not going to argue with you about "12 or 13 gods". There is no point in arguing with someone who doesn't even know what he's arguing about, just because he wants to argue. [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] This is the most humorous part of your "proof". [Hammond] Your constant reference to laughter is making you sound suspiciously like a lowbrow giggling idiot, which I suspect is the case. [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] You want to somehow, with no justification, identify perception of reality as a god. This is pretty bizarre as it comes out of nowhere with no justification and is, in fact, completely opposite to what happens in the real world. The more educated people are, the less they cling to the myths of the religions. Even if it were true, and it is not, you have shown no connection with a god. This is just you hoping that no one will notice that this assuming what you want to prove. [Hammond] You're so obviously incompetent its jpathetic. Look, the basic plot, as in any scientific investigation, is to itemize the characteristics of the phenomenon, and then see if there is any known simple scientific mechanism which would explain it. In this case this means itimizing the CENTRAL CLAIMS of Religion (take Biblical religion for instance) and seeing if the discovered mechanism (curvature of subjective spacetime) COMPELLINGLY AND QUANTITATIVELY EXPLAINS EACH AND EVERY ITEM. The SPOG scientifically and quantitatively explains the following 16 (central and comprehensive) items which characterize Religion: 1. Why there physically exists an "invisible world" known as "Heaven" which is similar to Earth but is a paradise. (Because the Growth Deficit reduces mental speed and thus reduces the Fourier cutoff frequency of visual movement) This can be easily measured directly by theMotion Picture Fusion Frequency, which increases directly with gross brain growth) 2. Why God is an "invisible man" who lives there and is all powerful and rules the actual (visible) world from there. ("God" is the perfect fully grown man, hence the part of us that is latent, or ungrown, is called the "invisible God", also the "Unconscious mind") 3. Why this God can effect miracles which transcend the (known) laws of Physics. (Because, a change in Repression causes a dramatic change in Curvature of subjective spacetime suddenly making more of reality visible). 4. Why Jesus said "God is a spirit" Jn 4:24 (This is confirmed by the SPOG which shows that "God" is the unconscious mind, which is a "spirit") 5. Why historically Religion has evolved from Polytheism to Monotheism. (The SPOG proves that there are 4 orders of eigenvectors, which is a "hierarchy of gods". the entire history of Religion is accounted for as a successive discovery of the orders from 1st=(demigods), 2nd=(Olympian gods), 3rd= (4-Gospel Saints), 4th=(God of Monotheism) 6. Why Christianity says the world is transforming itself into Heaven and will actually complete this at a date known as "Kingdom Come"... or the "end of the world". (Because the Secular Trend curve in Human Growth is a Sigmoidal Logistics curve (S-curve) and the final plateau is 100% growth of the individual, or "Kingdom Come") 7. Why there is such a thing as "Eternal Life". (Because full growth means flat subjective spacetime.. no time dilation.. aka eternal time) 8. Why it is believed that Jesus was the physical "incarnation of God" (Because, nominally Jesus was a "fully grown specimen". Of course we know this wasn't actually possible, but in fact he must have been an impressive specimen to conduct such a startling public ministry.) 9. Why the Cross for some reason is the central symbol of (Western) Religion. (Because the human body is an "axial quadrature" and the brain actually "cubic" causing a cross structure (Cartesian structure) of Personality) 10. Why for some reason our main canonical text is written in 4 identical versions known as the "4-Gospel Canon". (Because the Structural Model is CUBIC, represented as a square; 4 Gospel Canon represents the 4 canonical personalities of Man... cf. the Bicameral/2 Party system) 11. How God "created the world" only a matter of "thousands" of years ago (Genesis) not "billions" of years ago (Big Bang) as Science believes. (Because subjective spacetime only came into being when Man came into being 200,000 years ago, causing the Biblical Creation). 12. Why God created man "in his own image". (Because God is the invisible (fully grown) version of Man). 13. Why there is a "Trinity of God" and what it is, functionally or scientifically speaking. (the Trinity is simply the cybernetic feedback loop (input, output, feedback) describing the operation of the Father (invisible man), Son actual Man, and feedback (UNCS mind) that transforms the latter into the former). 14. Why there are (approximately) 13 gods in the Egypto-Greco-Roman pantheon. (Because the 2nd orders are caused by the 13 symmetry axes of the cubic str. of the brain). 15. Why there are exactly 4-gospel Saints named Matthew, mark, Luke, John. (Because the Cubic str. of Personality can be represented by a section through the Cube, yielding the 4 canonical personalities of Man) 16. Why there are 30 odd "lesser demigods" in Hinduism. (Because there are 30 1st-order eigenvectors caused by myriad lower level brain structures; not geometrically intercorrelated) THIS OVERWHELMING, COMPREHENSIVE EXPLANATION OF THE ENTIRE BODY OF CLASSICAL RELIGION, BY A SIMPLE RELATIVISTIC CURVATURE MECHANISM, IS PRIMA FACIE THE WORLD'S FIRST AND ONLY BONA FIDE "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD". Now you can sit there and giggle like a flat footed fat ass academy boy all you want, but it certainly is NOT convincing. either show us some of your scintillating PhD forensic scientist genius a la ronald Reagan, or go back to work designing Widgets at Quintessential Trinkets where you belong. snip argumentative no content crap ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
George Hammond writes:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:49:40 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)" wrote: [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] Or 12 assuming that the Greeks did not know the difference between 12 and 13 as you have claimed earlier. Look, I already told you 3 times, the only EXACT scientific fact is that there are EXACTLY 13-2nd ORDER EIGENVECTORS, extracted by mainframe computers. OK, EXACTLY 13 2nd order eigenvectors (however you redefine 'eigenvector'). Not 14, not 12, but EXACTLY 13. Got it. The ancients didn't know what an eigenvector is, or that the 13-2nd orders are CUBICALLY intercorrelated. Hammond discovered that (1994) They just took an educated guess and called it an even DOZEN (the Greek Dodekatheon so called). They were right to within 7.7%, pretty good for ancient science. Oh, that's rich. 7.7% "pretty good for ancient science". Let's imagine, just for a moment, that the ancient Greeks built the Parthenon with some of the Doric columns 12 meters tall and others 13 meters tall. The 12m and 13m columns all mixed up. That would be "pretty good for ancient science", right? Only 7.7% off, right? Wrong - if they ever did that, the Parthenon would look pathetic. Instead of the ancient Greeks being revered by western society, they'd be the laughing stock of the ancient world! I'm laughing just thinking about it! So you'll have to find some other trivia to rag on, I've beaten your "12 vs. 13" objection to death. You're the one who makes it a big deal about your claim that there are "EXACTLY 13 2nd order Eigenvectors". Well guess what. 12 is NOT "exactly 13". 12 is within 92% of 13. This is well within the expected experimental accuracy of historical data. Once again, imagine the Parthenon with some of the columns 92% the height of the others! A three year old could do better! BTW, 12 and 13 are not within 3 significant figures of each other. (do you even know what that means?) Try 1 sig fig. |
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George Hammond" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:07:44 +0100, "marc" wrote: "George Hammond" wrote in message . .. CLEARLY anyone with half a brain in his head.. And even more clearly, anyone with more than half a brain in his head immediately recognises Hammond's irrational spewing as emanating from a severely deranged mind. Hammond must be a rare example of a literal half-wit. Marc Gee whiz, is Marc really Cram spelled backwards? No, it is definitive scientific proof that my name scientifically proves that my name scientifically reflects the scientific relativistic curvature of the alphabet to 4 significant letters which is scientifically causally identical to scientifically calculated cubic eigenvectors of scientific numerical quantification thereby scientifically proving that God has 4 letters to 3 or 4 significant letters thereby scientifically proving that humans came into being once they acquired the ability to count to 4, or 3, thereby scientifically proving the existence of an invisible world that can only be scientifically detected by scientifically arranging the letters in a square as the Greeks did to 3 or 4 significant letters thereby scientifically proving that the invisible world exists due the subjective curvature of the end of Jesus' beard thereby scientifically proving the existence of 12 or 13 (scientifically rounded to the most convenient value) follicle gods as scientifically proven by the scientifically psychometric FACT that the gospel of Matthew has 4 letters as do all the gods of Olympus (scientifically rounded to the most convenient number) which therefore scientifically proves that the growth deficit of the relativistic curvature of the alphabet can only be perceived by those who can see the invisible world which has been scientifically proved by analysis of the Motion Sickness of the 12th or 13th Eigenvector of the cubic structure of personality which has been scientifically empirically verified to 100% accuracy within the scientific parameters of the scientifically proved psychometric definition of 'one dozen'. Surely even you can see that 3 (God) x 4 (Cram) = 13 as scientifically rounded to 12 as allowed by the scientific cubic eigenvector analysis of the Egypto-Greco-Roman Pantheon. I have therefore scientifically proved the scientifically overwhelming scientific proof of my scientific proof and if you cannot see this then you are not worthy to discuss it with me. Marc == Cram |
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George Hammond" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:29:58 +0000 (UTC), (Michael Moroney) wrote: George Hammond writes: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:49:40 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)" wrote: [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] Or 12 assuming that the Greeks did not know the difference between 12 and 13 as you have claimed earlier. [Hammond] Look, I already told you 3 times, the only EXACT scientific fact is that there are EXACTLY 13-2nd ORDER EIGENVECTORS, extracted by mainframe computers. [Michael Moroney] OK, EXACTLY 13 2nd order eigenvectors (however you redefine 'eigenvector'). Not 14, not 12, but EXACTLY 13. Got it. [Hammond] Whaddau mean "redefine eigenvector"? An eigenvector is a principle axis of a matrix ellipsoid, whether it's in quantum mechanics, Psychometry Factor Analysis or the moment of Inertia in Mechanics, makes no difference. An eigenvector is an eigenvector. The Pagan "gods" are 2nd order psychometry eigenvectors caused by the cubic anatomical symmetry cleavage of the brain. They form a CUBE. [Hammond] The ancients didn't know what an eigenvector is, or that the 13-2nd orders are CUBICALLY intercorrelated. Hammond discovered that (1994) They just took an educated guess and called it an even DOZEN (the Greek Dodekatheon so called). They were right to within 7.7%, pretty good for ancient science. [Michael Moroney] Oh, that's rich. [Hammond] Rich; I don't know what food stamps are, never mind money. [Michael Moroney] 7.7% "pretty good for ancient science". Let's imagine, just for a moment, that the ancient Greeks built the Parthenon with some of the Doric columns 12 meters tall and others 13 meters tall. The 12m and 13m columns all mixed up. That would be "pretty good for ancient science", right? Only 7.7% off, right? Wrong - if they ever did that, the Parthenon would look pathetic. Instead of the ancient Greeks being revered by western society, they'd be the laughing stock of the ancient world! I'm laughing just thinking about it! [Hammond] Cut the **** Moroney, measureing something with a ruler like the Parthenon is kid stuff. Fact is Eratosthenes estimated the Earth's circumference around 240 BCE. The Sun was directly overhead in Syene at the summer solstice but in Alexandria it still cast a shadow. Using the distance and angles he estimated the Earth's circumference. Eratosthenes' figure has an error of around five to ten percent. So "7.7%" was par for the course in advanced scientific measurement in ancient Greece. The fact that they could estimate "God" to 7.7% is a phenomenal scientific achievement by comparison! [Hammond] So you'll have to find some other trivia to rag on, I've beaten your "12 vs. 13" objection to death. [Michael Moroney] You're the one who makes it a big deal about your claim that there are "EXACTLY 13 2nd order Eigenvectors". Well guess what. 12 is NOT "exactly 13". [Hammond] Like I said, the Greeks were 7.7% off, same as their measuremet of the Earth's circumference. BTW, 12 and 13 are not within 3 significant figures of each other. (do you even know what that means?) Try 1 sig fig. [Hammond] I've got 2 degrees in Physics from accredited universities in Massachusetts, that certifies that I KNOW what it means. You MAY have had (at one time) two degrees. Since you demean and insult others who have BETTER degrees - your mean nothing! It is blatantly obviously that the psuchotic nature of your bellowings and posting has completely overwhen any past educational experi3ence you may have had. IOW - when your insane, the grades you made in school don't mount up to ****! Modern Science has proved that there are 13-2nd order eigenvectors EXACTLY (because they form a Cube)...... it was the ANCIENT GREEKS who were off by 7.7%.... because they simply took an educated guess of a dozen. THERE ACTUALLY are 13 so called "Olympian gods". Incidentally, Hippocrates was EXACTLY RIGHT about the 4-Humors, because again, modern science has proven that there are EXACTLY 4-3rd ORDER EIGENVECTORS. Today they are known as "Matthew, Mark, Luke and John" in Religion. Modern science did not such thing! They do NOT claim "religion" is science! |
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
|
George Hammond wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:29:58 +0000 (UTC), (Michael Moroney) wrote: George Hammond writes: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:49:40 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)" wrote: [Doug, unverified Physics Phd claimant] Or 12 assuming that the Greeks did not know the difference between 12 and 13 as you have claimed earlier. [Hammond] Look, I already told you 3 times, the only EXACT scientific fact is that there are EXACTLY 13-2nd ORDER EIGENVECTORS, extracted by mainframe computers. [Michael Moroney] OK, EXACTLY 13 2nd order eigenvectors (however you redefine 'eigenvector'). Not 14, not 12, but EXACTLY 13. Got it. [Hammond] Whaddau mean "redefine eigenvector"? An eigenvector is a principle axis of a matrix ellipsoid, whether it's in quantum mechanics, Psychometry Factor Analysis or the moment of Inertia in Mechanics, makes no difference. An eigenvector is an eigenvector. The Pagan "gods" are 2nd order psychometry eigenvectors caused by the cubic anatomical symmetry cleavage of the brain. They form a CUBE. You keep making these wild humorous and unsupported assumptions. [Hammond] The ancients didn't know what an eigenvector is, or that the 13-2nd orders are CUBICALLY intercorrelated. Hammond discovered that (1994) They just took an educated guess and called it an even DOZEN (the Greek Dodekatheon so called). They were right to within 7.7%, pretty good for ancient science. 12 did not equal 13 even in Greece. Look, they knew how to count. It does not mean your conclusion is good to 7.7%, it means that it is wrong. [Michael Moroney] Oh, that's rich. [Hammond] Rich; I don't know what food stamps are, never mind money. [Michael Moroney] 7.7% "pretty good for ancient science". Let's imagine, just for a moment, that the ancient Greeks built the Parthenon with some of the Doric columns 12 meters tall and others 13 meters tall. The 12m and 13m columns all mixed up. That would be "pretty good for ancient science", right? Only 7.7% off, right? Wrong - if they ever did that, the Parthenon would look pathetic. Instead of the ancient Greeks being revered by western society, they'd be the laughing stock of the ancient world! I'm laughing just thinking about it! [Hammond] Cut the **** Moroney, measureing something with a ruler like the Parthenon is kid stuff. Fact is Eratosthenes estimated the Earth's circumference around 240 BCE. The Sun was directly overhead in Syene at the summer solstice but in Alexandria it still cast a shadow. Using the distance and angles he estimated the Earth's circumference. Eratosthenes' figure has an error of around five to ten percent. So "7.7%" was par for the course in advanced scientific measurement in ancient Greece. The fact that they could estimate "God" to 7.7% is a phenomenal scientific achievement by comparison! Another bizarre assumption. If "god" is a thing, there is no percentage. You either have the real one or you do not. [Hammond] So you'll have to find some other trivia to rag on, I've beaten your "12 vs. 13" objection to death. [Michael Moroney] You're the one who makes it a big deal about your claim that there are "EXACTLY 13 2nd order Eigenvectors". Well guess what. 12 is NOT "exactly 13". [Hammond] Like I said, the Greeks were 7.7% off, same as their measuremet of the Earth's circumference. BTW, 12 and 13 are not within 3 significant figures of each other. (do you even know what that means?) Try 1 sig fig. [Hammond] I've got 2 degrees in Physics from accredited universities in Massachusetts, that certifies that I KNOW what it means. As with the rest of your conclusions, this is completely wrong. It means you did not get thrown out before that point. What you learned or remembered is irrelevant. Modern Science has proved No, Hammond has assumed without proof. that there are 13-2nd order eigenvectors EXACTLY (because they form a Cube)...... it was the ANCIENT GREEKS who were off by 7.7%.... Because you assume they could not count. because they simply took an educated guess of a dozen. So you believe they created their gods to fit your future theory but were to primitive to get the number right? THERE ACTUALLY are 13 so called "Olympian gods". Incidentally, Hippocrates was EXACTLY RIGHT about the 4-Humors, because again, modern science has proven that there are EXACTLY 4-3rd ORDER EIGENVECTORS. Today they are known as "Matthew, Mark, Luke and John" in Religion. These four are the names of books in the new testament. These books were written at different times by different people. Luke and John were written from 100-200 years later by writers in what is now Turkey where Paul went to establish christianity. The names of authors spread over a few hundred years is not likely to have any scientific importance. You will have to look for something else to push. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE | George Hammond | Physics - General Discussion | 462 | May 21st 08 01:52 PM |
| A New Anthropic Principle | Radi Khrapko | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 42 | January 16th 04 05:46 PM |
| Anthropic principle | Lubos Motl | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 13 | October 25th 03 03:19 PM |
| Anthropic principle | Bill Jefferys | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 2 | October 25th 03 01:34 AM |