![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: ehgd12, ehv, einsteins, plancks |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject:
Planck's E=hv Einstein's E=h(Gd)^1/2 Body of message: Perhaps for the simple reason that at density 8.2089591 x 10^95 kg/m^3 Planck's formula E=hv E = h v 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s) (7.4008894 x 10^42 /s) [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] and Einstein's formula E=h(Gd)^1/2 E = h (Gd)^1/2 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s) [(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(8.2089591 x 10^95 kg/m^3)]^1/2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] are equivalent. But Einstein's is better, for it possesses the additional tool which is needed for understanding gravity waves, the density. E=h(Gd)^1/2 Founded 1 April 1955 |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Planck's Constant ISN'T Constant - According to Smart1234 | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 11th 03 06:02 AM |
| Is Planck's Constant really Constant? I don't think so. Smart1234 | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 10th 03 11:59 PM |
| Is Planck's Constant really Constant? I don't think so. Smart1234 | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | July 10th 03 06:42 PM |