![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: particles |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
A and B are 2 positions in coordinate system, particles p,q are at A
and B respectively. p moves perpendicular to AB, q is directed towards p always, both have speed= v m/s, distance b/w them initially is d, find the distance b/w them at time=infinity. plz help me solve this problem, or giving various ideas regards, Divij |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 1, 5:07 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
Divij Rao wrote: A and B are 2 positions in coordinate system, particles p,q are at A and B respectively. p moves perpendicular to AB, q is directed towards p always, both have speed= v m/s, distance b/w them initially is d, find the distance b/w them at time=infinity. Infinity is not a point in time. Pick some value for time and add one. but the question stands that way. it means, at the end, when the particles are almost collinear to A, the distance b/w them is _______. one may imagine q is on A-p, position A and particle p. one idea that i have is that from the frame of reference of p, q is moving in a straight line towards itself....but even thn how to proceed? thanks for trying. regards, Divij |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 30 juin, 14:17, Divij Rao wrote:
A and B are 2 positions in coordinate system, particles p,q are at A and B respectively. p moves perpendicular to AB, q is directed towards p always, both have speed= v m/s, distance b/w them initially is d, find the distance b/w them at time=infinity. plz help me solve this problem, or giving various ideas regards, Divij Very interesting problem. One thing is certain, q will never catch up with p since they have the same velocity. First hunch is that you are dealing with an asymptote, with q trailing behind p at AB - deltaAB Hope this helps. André Michaud |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
First hunch is that you are dealing with an asymptote, with q trailing behind p at AB - deltaAB i dont know so much...in simpler words...plz Hope this helps. didnot understand the meaning . André Michaud thank you, Divij |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 8 juil, 07:50, Divij Rao wrote:
First hunch is that you are dealing with an asymptote, with q trailing behind p at AB - deltaAB i dont know so much...in simpler words...plz Hope this helps. didnot understand the meaning . André Michaud thank you, Divij Sorry for the delay, I just saw your post. I requote your question here for convenience: A and B are 2 positions in coordinate system, particles p,q are at A and B respectively. p moves perpendicular to AB, q is directed towards p always, both have speed= v m/s, distance b/w them initially is d, find the distance b/w them at time=infinity. I will try to make you see what I conclude. Imagine position A and B as lying on a horizontal line (x axis ?) you have p initially located at A and q initially located at B the distance between p and q is d, and both p and q have the same velocity, so imagine p and q tied together by a string, which will force q to always move towards p as p moves away. now if you set the particles in motion at velocity v, p is going to move upwards vertically with q being pulled along, always moving towards p. Now, the string is mentioned only so that you can clearly see how q can always point towards p. At the beginning, q will move almost horizontally but will progressively angle upwards since it is following p which is moving vertically upwards. After some time, q will end up moving vertically as it trails behind p. since both have the same velocity, q will be unable to catch up with p and will forever follow behind. You are dealing with uniform motion for both p and q I did not do the actual math, so I don't know whether q will catch up some with p. I expect so, but I really wouldn't know without doing the actual math. André Michaud |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 10, 9:47 pm, wrote:
On 8 juil, 07:50, Divij Rao wrote: First hunch is that you are dealing with an asymptote, with q trailing behind p at AB - deltaAB i dont know so much...in simpler words...plz Hope this helps. didnot understand the meaning . André Michaud thank you, Divij Sorry for the delay, I just saw your post. I requote your question here for convenience: A and B are 2 positions in coordinate system, particles p,q are at A and B respectively. p moves perpendicular to AB, q is directed towards p always, both have speed= v m/s, distance b/w them initially is d, find the distance b/w them at time=infinity. I will try to make you see what I conclude. Imagine position A and B as lying on a horizontal line (x axis ?) you have p initially located at A and q initially located at B the distance between p and q is d, and both p and q have the same velocity, so imagine p and q tied together by a string, which will force q to always move towards p as p moves away. now if you set the particles in motion at velocity v, p is going to move upwards vertically with q being pulled along, always moving towards p. Now, the string is mentioned only so that you can clearly see how q can always point towards p. At the beginning, q will move almost horizontally but will progressively angle upwards since it is following p which is moving vertically upwards. After some time, q will end up moving vertically as it trails behind p. since both have the same velocity, q will be unable to catch up with p and will forever follow behind. You are dealing with uniform motion for both p and q I did not do the actual math, so I don't know whether q will catch up some with p. I expect so, but I really wouldn't know without doing the actual math. André Michaud excellent idea! but i m still not sure... suppose p has moved a distance x, after some time say t, by speed, we cant say that distance between p and q is the same, as per the xample, the string MAY become loose. maybe u r correct. thanks a lot, all comments will be appreciated. Regards, Divij |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 15 juil, 01:43, Divij Rao wrote:
On Jul 10, 9:47 pm, wrote: On 8 juil, 07:50, Divij Rao wrote: First hunch is that you are dealing with an asymptote, with q trailing behind p at AB - deltaAB i dont know so much...in simpler words...plz Hope this helps. didnot understand the meaning . AndréMichaud thank you, Divij Sorry for the delay, I just saw your post. I requote your question here for convenience: A and B are 2 positions in coordinate system, particles p,q are at A and B respectively. p moves perpendicular to AB, q is directed towards p always, both have speed= v m/s, distance b/w them initially is d, find the distance b/w them at time=infinity. I will try to make you see what I conclude. Imagine position A and B as lying on a horizontal line (x axis ?) you have p initially located at A and q initially located at B the distance between p and q is d, and both p and q have the same velocity, so imagine p and q tied together by a string, which will force q to always move towards p as p moves away. now if you set the particles in motion at velocity v, p is going to move upwards vertically with q being pulled along, always moving towards p. Now, the string is mentioned only so that you can clearly see how q can always point towards p. At the beginning, q will move almost horizontally but will progressively angle upwards since it is following p which is moving vertically upwards. After some time, q will end up moving vertically as it trails behind p. since both have the same velocity, q will be unable to catch up with p and will forever follow behind. You are dealing with uniform motion for both p and q I did not do the actual math, so I don't know whether q will catch up some with p. I expect so, but I really wouldn't know without doing the actual math. AndréMichaud excellent idea! but i m still not sure... suppose p has moved a distance x, after some time say t, by speed, we cant say that distance between p and q is the same, as per the xample, the string MAY become loose. That was my point, precisely. You must do the calculation to ascertain the final distance between p and q. maybe u r correct. What is uncertain in my mind, without doing the actual calculation, is whether or not on the first leg of the motion p will come any closer to p, but I am positive that once q tends towards moving vertically (following p since it is always pointing towards p) the distance will tend to become stable, and remain stable, since both have the same velocity. André Michaud thanks a lot, all comments will be appreciated. Regards, Divij |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 15, 11:03 pm, wrote:
On 15 juil, 01:43, Divij Rao wrote: On Jul 10, 9:47 pm, wrote: On 8 juil, 07:50, Divij Rao wrote: First hunch is that you are dealing with an asymptote, with q trailing behind p at AB - deltaAB i dont know so much...in simpler words...plz Hope this helps. didnot understand the meaning . AndréMichaud thank you, Divij Sorry for the delay, I just saw your post. I requote your question here for convenience: A and B are 2 positions in coordinate system, particles p,q are at A and B respectively. p moves perpendicular to AB, q is directed towards p always, both have speed= v m/s, distance b/w them initially is d, find the distance b/w them at time=infinity. I will try to make you see what I conclude. Imagine position A and B as lying on a horizontal line (x axis ?) you have p initially located at A and q initially located at B the distance between p and q is d, and both p and q have the same velocity, so imagine p and q tied together by a string, which will force q to always move towards p as p moves away. now if you set the particles in motion at velocity v, p is going to move upwards vertically with q being pulled along, always moving towards p. Now, the string is mentioned only so that you can clearly see how q can always point towards p. At the beginning, q will move almost horizontally but will progressively angle upwards since it is following p which is moving vertically upwards. After some time, q will end up moving vertically as it trails behind p. since both have the same velocity, q will be unable to catch up with p and will forever follow behind. You are dealing with uniform motion for both p and q I did not do the actual math, so I don't know whether q will catch up some with p. I expect so, but I really wouldn't know without doing the actual math. AndréMichaud excellent idea! but i m still not sure... suppose p has moved a distance x, after some time say t, by speed, we cant say that distance between p and q is the same, as per the xample, the string MAY become loose. That was my point, precisely. You must do the calculation to ascertain the final distance between p and q. maybe u r correct. What is uncertain in my mind, without doing the actual calculation, is whether or not on the first leg of the motion p will come any closer to p, but I am positive that once q tends towards moving vertically (following p since it is always pointing towards p) the distance will tend to become stable, and remain stable, since both have the same velocity. André Michaud thanks a lot, all comments will be appreciated. Regards, Divij- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - yes, the distabnce bet them becomes constant after time infinity, but how to calculate that? can resolving the speeds of q along p be useful? if so how? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can supersonic sound create virtual particles and anhilate real particles?? | guskz@hotmail.com | The Theory of Relativity | 2 | June 8th 06 03:59 AM |
| Particles for Sue and Sal | Chris | The Theory of Relativity | 4 | March 15th 06 03:51 PM |
| one or many particles? | Cyberkatru | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 10 | January 15th 06 04:29 AM |
| one or many particles? | Cyberkatru | Particle Physics | 0 | January 1st 06 08:39 PM |
| Many particles or just one? | Roland Vasco | Particle Physics | 1 | October 19th 03 06:39 PM |