A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , ,

Quantum Gravity 145.6: All "Derivatives" Except Probable Influence/Causation Are "Entanglement/Miscodings"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 27th 07 posted to sci.physics
OsherD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,831
Default Quantum Gravity 145.6: All "Derivatives" Except Probable Influence/Causation Are "Entanglement/Miscodings"

From Osher Doctorow

Now compare the various other types of "derivatives", including the
Lie derivative of funcitons, vector fields, differential forms, and
tensors, with the simplicity of the Probable Influence/Causation (PI)
"derivative", that is to say (Probable) Causation P(A--B) or P' (A--
B):


1) P(A--B) = 1 + y - x, y = P(AB), x = P(A)
2) P' (A--B) = 1 + y - x, y = P(B), x = P(A), P(B) = P(A)

Equations (1) and (2) are in an obvious sense linear or antilinear
(linear in the second argument, antilinear in the first), which is
especially true for (2) and can be shown to be true for (1) when (1)
and (2) coincide, etc.

Most important, + or - only are used in PI, while the various
generalized "derivatives" of other types used various multiplications
together with additions or subtractions. For example, if L_X or LX
for short is the Lie derivative with respect to X:

3) LX(w) = i_X dw + d(i_X w)

for differential form w.

So the other types of "derivatives" introduce greater complexity and
complications, but also they typically introduce geometry as "coding"
for Causation. A typical such introduced "geometric Causation" is
nonzero curvature of space introduced via nonzero Lie brackets or
connections. The "object" so introduced is "supposed" intuitively to
account for Causation, but the code involves not only + and - but
multiplication and/or division and other things. It is roughly
analogous to using complex numbers to solve real equations and then
forgetting to translate back to real equations, or worse still not
knowing how to translate back.

Osher Doctorow

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Gravity 145.5: The Covariant Derivative As A Spatial "Entanglement" of Causation OsherD Physics - General Discussion 0 May 27th 07 03:52 PM
Quantum Gravity 113: The Minkowski-Maxwell "Variant" of GR and Probable Influence/Causation (PI) OsherD Physics - General Discussion 2 April 5th 07 10:48 AM
Quantum Gravity 26.1: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation" and Statistical Independence OsherD Physics - General Discussion 0 March 20th 06 05:13 PM
sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2) Relates to "Real" Laurent Series and Probable Influence Transform OsherD Physics - General Discussion 1 February 6th 06 12:42 AM
Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation" 2: Probable Correlation OsherD Physics - General Discussion 0 December 16th 05 05:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Finance - Myspace Proxy Directory - Problem Mortgage - Phpnuke Database - Free Advertising