I have been thinking about this for a long time -- each one of these
usenet entities qualifies for the Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science
Award by themselves (and some already have one), but trying to reward
their efforts individually would take many months. While pondering
this situation, it occurred to me that the common theme to these
science kooks is their dedication to showing how Einstein was wrong,
more specifically how they toil for untold hours attempting to undo the
heinous wrong imposed by Special and General Relativity. Thus, I was
led to a group nomination, as follows.

First, the award description:

Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award

"Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
inventions, institutions, and prides-of-joys, who have reasoned it out,
who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a better
humanity... if only somebody would listen to them."

It is my opinion that these visionaries qualify, so I therefore
nominate the anti-relativists of sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity,
and sci.astro for the VVFWS. The collective nominees a

Androcles and his array of socks
Jeff dot dot dot Relf
Henri Wilson
V dot Porat
kenseto
[hanson]
Tom Crackpotter
greysky
G=EMC^2 Glazier (Bert / Treb)

If there are omissions from or errors in this list, corrections are
certainly welcome.

Any seconds for the nomination?

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
I have been thinking about this for a long time -- each one of these
usenet entities qualifies for the Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science
Award by themselves (and some already have one), but trying to reward
their efforts individually would take many months. While pondering
this situation, it occurred to me that the common theme to these
science kooks is their dedication to showing how Einstein was wrong,
more specifically how they toil for untold hours attempting to undo the
heinous wrong imposed by Special and General Relativity. Thus, I was
led to a group nomination, as follows.

First, the award description:

Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award

"Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
inventions, institutions, and prides-of-joys, who have reasoned it out,
who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a better
humanity... if only somebody would listen to them."

It is my opinion that these visionaries qualify, so I therefore
nominate the anti-relativists of sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity,
and sci.astro for the VVFWS. The collective nominees a

Androcles and his array of socks
Jeff dot dot dot Relf
Henri Wilson
V dot Porat
kenseto
[hanson]
Tom Crackpotter
greysky
G=EMC^2 Glazier (Bert / Treb)

If there are omissions from or errors in this list, corrections are
certainly welcome.

Any seconds for the nomination?



Massively seconded.

"Art Deco" wrote in message
...
I have been thinking about this for a long time -- each one of these
usenet entities qualifies for the Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science
Award by themselves (and some already have one), but trying to reward
their efforts individually would take many months. While pondering
this situation, it occurred to me that the common theme to these
science kooks is their dedication to showing how Einstein was wrong,
more specifically how they toil for untold hours attempting to undo the
heinous wrong imposed by Special and General Relativity. Thus, I was
led to a group nomination, as follows.

First, the award description:

Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award

"Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
inventions, institutions, and prides-of-joys, who have reasoned it out,
who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a better
humanity... if only somebody would listen to them."

It is my opinion that these visionaries qualify, so I therefore
nominate the anti-relativists of sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity,
and sci.astro for the VVFWS. The collective nominees a

Androcles and his array of socks
Jeff dot dot dot Relf
Henri Wilson
V dot Porat
kenseto
[hanson]
Tom Crackpotter
greysky
G=EMC^2 Glazier (Bert / Treb)

If there are omissions from or errors in this list, corrections are
certainly welcome.

Any seconds for the nomination?

P.S. I would like to suggest adding Pentcho Valev and Jan Panteltje to the
list.

As for me, I don't think Einstein was wrong.

I think Newton, Einstein and Hawking are all right it their related
ways.

But If I were playing poker next to all three of them, I would merely
suggest (out of respect of course) That what they were observing of
time was really distance all along.

-y


On May 5, 1:07 am, Art Deco wrote:
I have been thinking about this for a long time -- each one of these
usenet entities qualifies for the Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science
Award by themselves (and some already have one), but trying to reward
their efforts individually would take many months. While pondering
this situation, it occurred to me that the common theme to these
science kooks is their dedication to showing how Einstein was wrong,
more specifically how they toil for untold hours attempting to undo the
heinous wrong imposed by Special and General Relativity. Thus, I was
led to a group nomination, as follows.

First, the award description:

Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award

"Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
inventions, institutions, and prides-of-joys, who have reasoned it out,
who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a better
humanity... if only somebody would listen to them."

It is my opinion that these visionaries qualify, so I therefore
nominate the anti-relativists of sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity,
and sci.astro for the VVFWS. The collective nominees a

Androcles and his array of socks
Jeff dot dot dot Relf
Henri Wilson
V dot Porat
kenseto
[hanson]
Tom Crackpotter
greysky
G=EMC^2 Glazier (Bert / Treb)

If there are omissions from or errors in this list, corrections are
certainly welcome.

Any seconds for the nomination?

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist

On May 4, 8:24 am, "T Wake" wrote:
"Art Deco" wrote in message

...





I have been thinking about this for a long time -- each one of these
usenet entities qualifies for the Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science
Award by themselves (and some already have one), but trying to reward
their efforts individually would take many months. While pondering
this situation, it occurred to me that the common theme to these
science kooks is their dedication to showing how Einstein was wrong,
more specifically how they toil for untold hours attempting to undo the
heinous wrong imposed by Special and General Relativity. Thus, I was
led to a group nomination, as follows.

First, the award description:

Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award

"Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
inventions, institutions, and prides-of-joys, who have reasoned it out,
who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a better
humanity... if only somebody would listen to them."

It is my opinion that these visionaries qualify, so I therefore
nominate the anti-relativists of sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity,
and sci.astro for the VVFWS. The collective nominees a

Androcles and his array of socks
Jeff dot dot dot Relf
Henri Wilson
V dot Porat
kenseto
[hanson]
Tom Crackpotter
greysky
G=EMC^2 Glazier (Bert / Treb)

If there are omissions from or errors in this list, corrections are
certainly welcome.

Any seconds for the nomination?

Massively seconded.


Please show one time where Bert Glazier has challenged Einstein or his
Relativity.

Double-A

"Frank Langella" wrote in message ...
"T Wake" wrote:

Any seconds for the nomination?

P.S. I would like to suggest adding Pentcho Valev and Jan Panteltje to
the list.

Hear, hear!

Surely you mean Baaa, baaa!
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SR.GIF

On May 4, 9:15 am, Y wrote:
As for me, I don't think Einstein was wrong.

I think Newton, Einstein and Hawking are all right it their related
ways.

But If I were playing poker next to all three of them, I would merely
suggest (out of respect of course) That what they were observing of
time was really distance all along.

-y

On May 5, 1:07 am, Art Deco wrote:

I have been thinking about this for a long time -- each one of these
usenet entities qualifies for the Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science
Award by themselves (and some already have one), but trying to reward
their efforts individually would take many months. While pondering
this situation, it occurred to me that the common theme to these
science kooks is their dedication to showing how Einstein was wrong,
more specifically how they toil for untold hours attempting to undo the
heinous wrong imposed by Special and General Relativity. Thus, I was
led to a group nomination, as follows.

First, the award description:

Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award

"Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
inventions, institutions, and prides-of-joys, who have reasoned it out,
who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a better
humanity... if only somebody would listen to them."

It is my opinion that these visionaries qualify, so I therefore
nominate the anti-relativists of sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity,
and sci.astro for the VVFWS. The collective nominees a

Androcles and his array of socks
Jeff dot dot dot Relf
Henri Wilson
V dot Porat
kenseto
[hanson]
Tom Crackpotter
greysky
G=EMC^2 Glazier (Bert / Treb)

If there are omissions from or errors in this list, corrections are
certainly welcome.

Any seconds for the nomination?

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist


Add :

Y
Traveler
Juan R
(Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato)
socratus
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect

GSS
LJBrewer
Koobee-Wooblee
Tom Van Flandern
Surfer
Uwe Hayek
Marcel Luttgens
oriel36
zzbunker
Nick
Ajay Sharma (physicsajay and his many sockpuppets)
Tom Potter
David Seppala
Barry
Phil
John Kennaugh
Reg Cahill
xhacker
Ken S. Tucker
Sue

"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...
On May 4, 8:24 am, "T Wake" wrote:
"Art Deco" wrote in message

...





I have been thinking about this for a long time -- each one of these
usenet entities qualifies for the Victor von Frankenstein Weird
Science
Award by themselves (and some already have one), but trying to reward
their efforts individually would take many months. While pondering
this situation, it occurred to me that the common theme to these
science kooks is their dedication to showing how Einstein was wrong,
more specifically how they toil for untold hours attempting to undo
the
heinous wrong imposed by Special and General Relativity. Thus, I was
led to a group nomination, as follows.

First, the award description:

Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award

"Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
inventions, institutions, and prides-of-joys, who have reasoned it
out,
who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a better
humanity... if only somebody would listen to them."

It is my opinion that these visionaries qualify, so I therefore
nominate the anti-relativists of sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity,
and sci.astro for the VVFWS. The collective nominees a

Androcles and his array of socks
Jeff dot dot dot Relf
Henri Wilson
V dot Porat
kenseto
[hanson]
Tom Crackpotter
greysky
G=EMC^2 Glazier (Bert / Treb)

If there are omissions from or errors in this list, corrections are
certainly welcome.

Any seconds for the nomination?

Massively seconded.


Please show one time where Bert Glazier has challenged Einstein or his
Relativity.

Double-A


Art and Gay Duck are in their "Luv Nest" right now.

They will reply after they "clean-up".

HJ

On May 4, 9:15 am, Y wrote:
As for me, I don't think Einstein was wrong.

I think Newton, Einstein and Hawking are all right it their related
ways.

But If I were playing poker next to all three of them, I would merely
suggest (out of respect of course) That what they were observing of
time was really distance all along.

-y

On May 5, 1:07 am, Art Deco wrote:

I have been thinking about this for a long time -- each one of these
usenet entities qualifies for the Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science
Award by themselves (and some already have one), but trying to reward
their efforts individually would take many months. While pondering
this situation, it occurred to me that the common theme to these
science kooks is their dedication to showing how Einstein was wrong,
more specifically how they toil for untold hours attempting to undo the
heinous wrong imposed by Special and General Relativity. Thus, I was
led to a group nomination, as follows.

First, the award description:

Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award

"Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
inventions, institutions, and prides-of-joys, who have reasoned it out,
who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a better
humanity... if only somebody would listen to them."

It is my opinion that these visionaries qualify, so I therefore
nominate the anti-relativists of sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity,
and sci.astro for the VVFWS. The collective nominees a

Androcles and his array of socks
Jeff dot dot dot Relf
Henri Wilson
V dot Porat
kenseto
[hanson]
Tom Crackpotter
greysky
G=EMC^2 Glazier (Bert / Treb)

If there are omissions from or errors in this list, corrections are
certainly welcome.

Any seconds for the nomination?

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist


List Continued

"Einsteinhoax" and his many,many socks

Shubee (Scooby Doo Doo)
Stamenin (and the Ustashi family)
ca314159
maxwell
kanuk
Don Stockbauer
Len Gaasenbeek

John \"C\ wrote:

They

No one asked for your input, Clockbrain.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist