![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: apollo, armstrong, exposes, hoax, neil |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
That aluminum space ship near the gamma moon is a gama lense .
A round lense . 3 idiots inside are near or on a 4.5 milirad gama radioactive moon . wile focal points from bent alluminum is making hot spots inside the vessel in the 20 milirad range . When they thought aluminum was a shield was about 15 years befor they found out alumium is a good lense for gama . befor they knew curved aluminum will focus and xray ..they biult a ROUND aluminum craft . dont matter .. they measured 1 milirad in orbit and 0.1mr on the moon . thats backwards because they thought the moon was a shield ,,its not shield its radioactive and hotter then space. nasa landed on a moon colder then space .. 9 milirad coolder ..when in fact thats flat out a lie. turns out in gamma the moon is ****ing radioactive and thorium hot. nasa cant walk around in 4.5 milirad. The face shield is worthless and your head would fall off the boan real quick. IF YOUR all to stupid to undestand the moon is not a shield from the radiation ....then your ****in dumb. 0.1 milirad is a long way from 4.5 . you put on any suite you want you wount live 60 seconds. Ground zero and the moon are the same . the inside of 3 mle island ,,2 milirad and no suite would protect you. yet a moon suite was good in 4.5 กกกกก |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"tj Frazir" wrote in message
That aluminum space ship near the gamma moon is a gama lense . A round lense . 3 idiots inside are near or on a 4.5 milirad gama radioactive moon . wile focal points from bent alluminum is making hot spots inside the vessel in the 20 milirad range . Unless you're talking of that "20 milirad range" dosage per second or at least per minute, as I think it had to be of a much greater hourly dosage while cruising at 100 km off that nasty deck. After all, there also wasn't enough shield density for stoping hard-X-rays. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Neil Armstrong exposes Apollo Hoax | schoenfeld.one@gmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 727 | May 13th 07 05:32 PM |
| Neil Armstrong exposes Apollo Hoax | schoenfeld.one@gmail.com | The Theory of Relativity | 178 | March 25th 07 06:53 PM |
| Neil Armstrong exposes Apollo Hoax | schoenfeld.one@gmail.com | Particle Physics | 171 | March 25th 07 06:53 PM |
| Neil Armstrong exposes Apollo Hoax | schoenfeld.one@gmail.com | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 83 | March 25th 07 06:53 PM |
| Neil Armstrong exposes Apollo Hoax | tj Frazir | Physics - General Discussion | 8 | March 12th 07 10:01 AM |