Quantum Gravity 85.0: Geometry and Sums - Physics Banter

A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

		Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Quantum Gravity 85.0: Geometry and Sums

Mark Forums Read

Tags: 850, geometry, gravity, quantum, sums

Quantum Gravity 85.0: Geometry and Sums

« National Hedgehog Day | Quantum Gravity 84.0 Vector Space vs Algebra »

#1

Old

February 3rd 07 posted to sci.physics

OsherD

external usenet poster

Posts: 3,831

Default

Quantum Gravity 85.0: Geometry and Sums

From Osher Doctorow

Two examples of the trends that I've been explaining in
this thread have just come out on Front for the Mathematics
ArXiv: "Lie algebra without algebra," by S. K. Donaldson
of Imperial College London U.K., and "Factorials as sums,"
by Roberto Auglani, U. degli Studi di Bari Italy, respectively
math.DG/0702016 v1 1 Feb 2007, 17 pages, and math.HO
/0702010 v1 Feb 2007.

To make a long story short, Donaldson derives most of
Lie algebra/groups from geometry, while Auglani derives
factorials (which are products found in almost every
branch of physics and mathematics) from sums including
sums with "observable in a generalized sense" interpreta-
tion and specification, that is to say for Auglani selecting
r objects from n = r objects (Combinatorics), etc.

Incidentally, somebody calling himself/herself/itself "Uncle
Al" posted a reply to my previous Section. If Uncle Al has
returned to sci.physics after an extended absence, then
he can wait for me for at least as long to reply (especially
after the language that he used to use in replying to
readers). If, as I suspect, the poster is an imitation "Uncle
Al" from somewhere like nospam dot com, then my not
replying will be equally valid.

Osher Doctorow

Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate

Reply With Quote

Ads

#2

Old

February 4th 07 posted to sci.physics

RNoster

external usenet poster

Posts: 7

Default

Quantum Gravity 85.0: Geometry and Sums

"OsherD" wrote in message
oups.com...
From Osher Doctorow

Two examples of the trends that I've been explaining in
this thread have just come out on Front for the Mathematics
ArXiv: "Lie algebra without algebra,"

totally useless artical, he should go get a job at McDonalds full time.

by S. K. Donaldson
of Imperial College London U.K., and "Factorials as sums,"

By an idiot that cannot figure out what ! means.

Good, your choise of articals is predictable.

Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate

Reply With Quote

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.5: Adding Stochastic Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity	OsherD	Physics - General Discussion	2	January 21st 07 08:21 AM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 71.2: Logarithms "Chaotically" Distort Sums	OsherD	Physics - General Discussion	4	January 12th 07 04:00 PM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 61.1: Percolation Theory As Geometry	OsherD	Physics - General Discussion	3	January 2nd 07 06:47 AM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 25.1: The Missing Link Between Euclidean and Anti-Euclidean Geometry	OsherD	Physics - General Discussion	1	October 8th 06 08:01 AM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 25.0: "Anti-Euclidean Geometry"	OsherD	Physics - General Discussion	0	October 8th 06 05:31 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:47 AM.