Proof of most of the World's unsolved Math Problems due to the fact
that Natural Numbers are these 0,1,2,3, ...., ...999999
Correcting the Logic of these mistakes in mathematics

(1) Infinity exists in only one unique form, and proof thereof
(2) Peano Axioms are gap ridden and self contradictory
(3) Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof, Indirect Method

In this long running thread I will prove these unsolved Math problems:
(4) Riemann Hypothesis
(5) Fermat's Last Theorem
(6) generalized FLT (known as Beals conjecture)
(7) Goldbach Conjecture
(8) Infinitude of Twin Primes
(9) Infinitude of 4-primes, 6-primes, 8-primes,....
(10) Infinitude of Perfect Numbers
(11) Infinitude of primes of form (2^n) +1
(12) the number 1 is the only odd perfect number

I will prove those above listed 4-12 by the key fact that the
Natural-Numbers are this set:

0 , 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11, ........., .....9999996,
.....999997, ......999998, .....9999999

I will also prove these unsolved problems of mathematics:
(13) Kepler Packing
(14) 4-Color-Mapping
(15) 2-Color-Mapping
(16) Poincare Conjecture

Finally, I will start on the road of proving these two claims
which I consider my best gifts to mathematics

(17) Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom
(18) and because numbers form geometry and likewise, geometry forms
number that
this is true Adics + (negative Adics) = Reals

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

a_plutonium wrote:
Proof of most of the World's unsolved Math Problems due to the fact
that Natural Numbers are these 0,1,2,3, ...., ...999999
Correcting the Logic of these mistakes in mathematics

(1) Infinity exists in only one unique form, and proof thereof
(2) Peano Axioms are gap ridden and self contradictory
(3) Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof, Indirect Method

In this long running thread I will prove these unsolved Math problems:

Correction there. I will do these posts more of an announcement, and
not as a thread to argue with hatemongers. So I announce the proof
and usually abandon the thread.

(4) Riemann Hypothesis
(5) Fermat's Last Theorem
(6) generalized FLT (known as Beals conjecture)
(7) Goldbach Conjecture
(8) Infinitude of Twin Primes
(9) Infinitude of 4-primes, 6-primes, 8-primes,....
(10) Infinitude of Perfect Numbers
(11) Infinitude of primes of form (2^n) +1
(12) the number 1 is the only odd perfect number

I will prove those above listed 4-12 by the key fact that the
Natural-Numbers are this set:

0 , 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11, ........., .....9999996,
....999997, ......999998, .....9999999

I will also prove these unsolved problems of mathematics:
(13) Kepler Packing
(14) 4-Color-Mapping
(15) 2-Color-Mapping
(16) Poincare Conjecture

Finally, I will start on the road of proving these two claims
which I consider my best gifts to mathematics


Let me include the NP problem as number (17) for I smell that
it is rife with ill-defining and that it is a problem not of
mathematics
at all but belongs to engineering and physics. Somehow the
intellectual community never sorted out this problem as belonging
to physics and allowed it to reside in mathematics where it never
really belonged.


(17) NP Problem

(18) Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom
(19) and because numbers form geometry and likewise, geometry forms
number that this is true Adics + (negative Adics) = Reals

That should do it. In fact the above is the most ambitious tackling of
mathematics
by any one single human. I even outchampioned my reincarnate of
Archimedes of
Ancient Greek.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

a_plutonium wrote:
Proof of most of the World's unsolved Math Problems due to the fact
that Natural Numbers are these 0,1,2,3, ...., ...999999
Correcting the Logic of these mistakes in mathematics

(1) Infinity exists in only one unique form, and proof thereof

I hope it's not that stupid proof that 0/I1 is not 0/I2, where I1 and
I2 are the infinities.

(2) Peano Axioms are gap ridden and self contradictory

AP is using "self contradictory" in a different sense than the rest of
the world.

(3) Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof, Indirect Method

In this long running thread I will prove these unsolved Math problems:
(4) Riemann Hypothesis
(5) Fermat's Last Theorem
(6) generalized FLT (known as Beals conjecture)
(7) Goldbach Conjecture
(8) Infinitude of Twin Primes
(9) Infinitude of 4-primes, 6-primes, 8-primes,....
(10) Infinitude of Perfect Numbers
(11) Infinitude of primes of form (2^n) +1
(12) the number 1 is the only odd perfect number

I will prove those above listed 4-12 by the key fact that the
Natural-Numbers are this set:

0 , 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11, ........., .....9999996,
....999997, ......999998, .....9999999

I will also prove these unsolved problems of mathematics:
(13) Kepler Packing

AP doesn't realize that this has been solved already. By real
mathematicians.

(14) 4-Color-Mapping

Ditto.

(15) 2-Color-Mapping

And this is a problem in Graph Theory texts.

(16) Poincare Conjecture

Finally, I will start on the road of proving these two claims
which I consider my best gifts to mathematics

(17) Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom
(18) and because numbers form geometry and likewise, geometry forms
number that
this is true Adics + (negative Adics) = Reals

If these are AP's gifts, he should expect them to be returned.

--- Christopher Heckman

a_plutonium wrote:
Peano Axioms are gap ridden

You're telling me. There's a gap between 0 and 1, another gap between 1 and
2, *another* gap between 2 and 3... heck, there are almost too many of them
to count.

-- Ben

good, he said he'd abandon this, cause I said "goodbye"
in th eother item. whether anyone else will type with me,
is another question!

I've forgotten; is it not known that
the Mersenne primes are infinite?

(10) Infinitude of Perfect Numbers

To a_plutonium,

I want some....whatever you are smoking...I want some.
Thank you.

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Nagu wrote:

To a_plutonium,

I want some....whatever you are smoking...I want some.

Air pollution! Free air pollution!
Free air pollution every where all the time.

Does strange things to your mind.
Does strange things to your body.

Everybody using it. We can't kick the habit.





Thank you.

(1) Infinity exists in only one unique form, and proof thereof

I hope it's not that stupid proof that 0/I1 is not 0/I2, where I1 and
I2 are the infinities.


Wise guy - huh ?

Infinity is not a number there Mr. Fermimath - and there was nothing
wrong with the proof until some smarty went and deleted duh thread.

wrote:
(1) Infinity exists in only one unique form, and proof thereof

I hope it's not that stupid proof that 0/I1 is not 0/I2, where I1 and
I2 are the infinities.


Wise guy - huh ?

Infinity is not a number there Mr. Fermimath - and there was nothing
wrong with the proof until some smarty went and deleted duh thread.

I'm not sure who this comment is aimed at, so set the record straight:
This actually is AP's proof; and here it is, in his own words ["In
physics, speed of light is a unique constant yields Special Relativity
and that the Maxwell Eq. are true; In Math, Infinity is a unique
constant yields....", sci.math, 2007 Jan 16, 7:59 pm]:

I pressed the issue in the mid 1990s with a beautiful little proof.

Proof that there exists one and only one type of Infinity: I posted it
to sci.math in the mid 1990s
and the lines of that proof went somewhat like this. Suppose the world
has two different types of
Infinity, such as the infinity of counting numbers and the infinity of
Reals. Call them Inf_C and
Inf_R. Now the number zero is a unique number. Now we divide 0 by Inf_C
and we end up with
0. Now we divide 0 by Inf_R. But since Inf_C does not equal Inf_R the
end result is that this
new number of 0/ Inf_R is not equal to 0 but some new type of zero. In
other words, if mathematics
has more than one type of infinity, then mathematics has more than one
type of zero.

--- Christopher Heckman

Proginoskes wrote:
wrote:
(1) Infinity exists in only one unique form, and proof thereof

I hope it's not that stupid proof that 0/I1 is not 0/I2, where I1 and
I2 are the infinities.


Wise guy - huh ?

Infinity is not a number there Mr. Fermimath - and there was nothing
wrong with the proof until some smarty went and deleted duh thread.

I'm not sure who this comment is aimed at, so set the record straight:
This actually is AP's proof; and here it is, in his own words ["In
physics, speed of light is a unique constant yields Special Relativity
and that the Maxwell Eq. are true; In Math, Infinity is a unique
constant yields....", sci.math, 2007 Jan 16, 7:59 pm]:

I pressed the issue in the mid 1990s with a beautiful little proof.

Proof that there exists one and only one type of Infinity: I posted it
to sci.math in the mid 1990s
and the lines of that proof went somewhat like this. Suppose the world
has two different types of
Infinity, such as the infinity of counting numbers and the infinity of
Reals. Call them Inf_C and
Inf_R. Now the number zero is a unique number. Now we divide 0 by Inf_C
and we end up with
0. Now we divide 0 by Inf_R. But since Inf_C does not equal Inf_R the
end result is that this
new number of 0/ Inf_R is not equal to 0 but some new type of zero. In
other words, if mathematics
has more than one type of infinity, then mathematics has more than one
type of zero.

--- Christopher Heckman



My bad.

Anyway, I'm not so sure that zero is really unique anyway. I still dont
believe the proof on Wiki.