The differences between the Newtonian and the
Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek against NEWTON and EINSTEIN respectively.

Vlcek against NEWTON

Let's have a real coordinates system firmly connected with a real
laboratory on Earth,
where all experiments testing the physical theories are
performed.
We know that this coordinates system moves around the Earth axis during

an astronomical day i. e. it performs a quasi-circular motion.
During the year
it rotates around the Sun approximately in a quasi-circle together with

the Earth.
During 2.108 years it circulates in the quasi-circle around the
center of the Galaxy. It performs a quasi-uniform motion in a
quasi-circle together with the Sun.
The Galaxy performs a quasi-uniform and quasi-circle
motion around the center within the framework of metagalaxies of star
clusters and our laboratory coordinates system on Earth together with
it, etc.
From the experimental testing of the law of inertia it is known that
the body moves along the "plane" stated by a waterlevel, i. e. in fact
it is not a straight-line uniform motion, but it is the motion in the
circle
of the Earth radius of R=6378 km.
The space aeronautics show that space ships,
Earth satellites and orbital laboratories move quasi-uniformly in
almost a circle around the Earth.
The atomic theory shows that the electrons and the nucleus circulate
around the center of gravity of atom in approximate circles.
The body rotating around its own axis (a flywheel) persists in this
status.
Similarly,
the planets, stars, galaxies, molecules, nuclei and elementary
particles
rotate around their own axes.
Since the uniform straight-line inertial motion
cannot be achieved in a microworld, its place here is exclusively in
the inertial quasi-circle motion.
It is analogous in the macroworld. Each real
"straight-line" motion can be replaced by a circle of a huge radius.
ENGLISH DICTIONARY in 2007:
inertia /i'nuhsha/ noun 1 a tendency to resist motion, exertion, or
change.
2a in physics, a property of matter by which it remains at rest or in
uniform motion
in the same straight line unless acted on by some external force.
Horizontal line is not horizontal straight line.
Horizontal line is horizontal circle (quasi-circle) with radius R =
6378
km.
Railway straight line is not straight line in geometry.
Railway straight line is horizontal circle (quasicircle).
A.Einstein [3] wrong write: Railway straight line is straight line in
geometry (planimetry).
Vertical line is straight line in geometry.
Horizontal surface is horizontal sphere.
Horizontal level is horizontal surface and horizontal sphere but is not

horizontal plane.
Geometrical plane is not sphere.
Mathematical straight line in not horizontal curve.
Plain trajectory is quasi-circle and not straight line.
Ship trajectory is quasi-circle and not straight line.
The standard Newtonian physics is somewhat corrected by Generalized Law

of Inertia.
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz/book.php?version=uk&page=1-2
ENGLISH DICTIONARY in 2057:
inertia /i'nuhsha/ noun 1 a tendency to resist motion, exertion, or
change.
2a in physics, a property of matter by which it remains at rest or in a

quasi-uniform motion in a quasi-circle unless acted on by some external

force.



This
discussion results in the following: "Every mass (atom, molecule,
particle, body, vacuum)
persists in the status of the quasi-rest or quasi-uniform
motion in a quasi-circle as far as it the external forces do not force
it to
change its status.
(This notion is called the generalized law of inertia)."

The inertial rotation of body consists of a quasi-uniform motion (in
the quasi circles) of body's atoms.
The inertial rotation of particle consists of a quasi-uniform motion
(in the quasi-circles) of subparticles - quarks, prequarks.
Finally, it is necessary to stress, that since the idea of inertial
straight-line uniform motion has no place in physics, neither the idea
of the inertial system
(in our theory it is replaced by the notion of
equivalent system-see 1.2.4.)
nor the notions of Einstein's principle of
relativity, local time,co-variant equations,
nor Lorent'z transformation equations,
nor physical definition of simultaneity,
nor invariant interval has any place in physics.

No real motion can be straight-line one. Every motion drawing near the
straight-line one is just a part of curvilinear circular motion with
final radius.
It will never reach the radius .
We have already known that straight-line motion does not really exist,
it is only possible a hypothetical approximation for large radii of
curvature.
On surface of Earth, the circle with radius is a "straight line"
(in light of the origin of this term at Newton - laboratory desk - a
plane defined
by the level).

These radii of curvature are even larger for galaxies - they have the
size
of several light years - and they are more similar to the straight
line,
which they will never reach. In reality we have not uniform motion in a

circle, but a non-uniform in ellipse (quasi-uniform motion in a
quasi-circle) or rosette respectively-see Consequences 2, point 20.
Centripetal acceleration forces in the author´s theory are not
constant
-
they change: alternatively it is growing and declining. In a "circle"
can be uniform or a non-uniform motion.
The non-uniform motion has a sequel: a little deformed circle on
ellipse or rosette respectively and creation of stationary cloud.

Centripetal acceleration is not the acceleration in direction of the
curve
of the circle (tangential one), but in direction perpendicular to this
curve, it has nothing in common with the acceleration in direction of
curve.

It determines the size of curvature of circle line only, and in the
extreme
case, the size of the straight line (for ).
However, it is not possible to
realize these extreme positions in reality.
For any "straight-line" motion it is valid that {[v]2} /R=0

On the surface of the Earth, on an ideal plane determined
by the water level, normal acceleration on the "straight line", that
lies in this plane, equals
{[v]2} /R = {[v]2} /6378km .
The standard Newtonian physics is somewhat corrected by Generalized Law

of Inertia.
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz/book.php?version=uk&page=1-2


Vlcek against EINSTEIN

Einstein made a serious mistake taking the Galilei's principle of
relativity, valid only for velocities vc, c - velocity of light, as
the
basis of the special (and general) theory of relativity.
He excluded the
Galileian system of coordinates and preserved the validity law of
inertia.
He also generalized its validity for systems moving at velocity .

Einstein has written:
"Prominent theoretical physicists were therefore more
inclined to reject the principle of relativity, in spite of the fact
that no empirical data had been found as contradictory to this
principle." -

RELATIVITY, THE SPECIAL AND THE GENERAL THEORY BY A. EINSTEIN,
AUTHORIZED
TRANSLATION BY ROBERT W. LANSON, FOURTH EDITION, LONDON 1921.
We will show
the empirical data contradictory to Einstein's principles of
relativity.

In this juncture the question of validity of the idea of space-and-time

frame has become ready to be discussed. The answer to the question may
be negative.
Nevertheless, there are two general facts, initially favorable to
the validity of the idea of space-and-time frame.

They a
A. The form of the interference field
B. The form of the intensity of the moving charge

In part 2 we will show, that the form of the interference field of the
moving medium is not-linear (it remains to prove by the metrologers
that the
interference field is also non-linear for the medium at rest).
We will also show, that the form of intensity of the moving charge is
asymmetric.
Einstein made a major mistake. The author proves it in revaluation
Kaufmann'
s, Fizeau's and Harres's experiments in light of the new theory
(intensity
of moving charge, non-linear form of the interference field, etc.).


1.1.1. Einstein's closed vicious circle

Einstein's two axioms:

a) law of propagation of light in all inertial frames
b) laws of physics (i. e. the law of propagation of light), identical
in all inertial frames, mean that the light is propagated in all
inertial
frames at the speed of c.
We can agree with this affirmation only in line with the closed
coordinates system,
with different media firmly connected with the frames (i. e. their
coordinate axes).
Otherwise, if we have the coordinate axes (skeletons) of inertial
frames with a common medium,
then is only one frame (skeleton - x, y, z axes) firmly connected to
the medium.
Although the light is propagated at the speed of c, with regard to
other inertial
frames, it is not true!
In all inertial frames not firmly connected to the medium
with regard to the frames (skeletons - x, y, z, axes only) the light
does not propagate
at the speed c, nevertheless the light cannot propagate in empty
inertial frames (skeletons x, y, z)!

According to Einstein, the expression of vacuum (emptiness) indents to
be apparently the unitive medium.
That is again not correct.

Nevertheless, the vacuum consists of elementary particles, which also
persist in a certain motion. It means that it is possible to connect
firmly
with a given vacuum the only one frame, which "moves at the speed of v
= 0"
with regard to the vacuum (medium). It is evident, that it is possible
to create
the vacuum laboratories on various planets. In all of them, the light
is propagated at speed c. But with regard to different inertial frames
of planets the speed is different. There are different vacuums, which
move
at different speed.
Einstein had to shelter himself behind the law of
propagation of light "at all times" so that both Einstein's axioms
could be "valid" simultaneously.

Einstein corrected the real difference of light speeds in different
inertial frames (skeletons) by "different times" in a fictitious
"SPACE-TIME".

He helped himself with a mixture of "space-time" mathematically
expressed
by the Lorentz transformation equations.
Then he helped himself with other new expressions,
that rescue what is not possible to rescue, whereby those
notions represent the following closed vicious circle:

Lorentz transformation equations

local time

covariant equations

physical definition of simultaneity

invariant interval

Lorentz transformation equations

We have shown that the idea of space-time frames is entirely wrong. All

notions in the closed vicious circle, including "mean proper lifetime
of particle" calculated on the basis of the Einstein's theory of
relativity

which was not measured experimentally in fact are absolutely wrong.

Physics is overflown by such anabashed points.
It is necessary to clean the physics.

It is necessary to strictly distinguish the measured values of the
particles lifetime from the so called proper (shorter) Einstein's
doubtful

particle lifetimes, which takes into consideration velocity and
shortens the
real lifetime to the shorter fictitious (incorrect) proper lifetime,
shown in the
tables.
The table proper lifetimes of particles have to be removed from
the physical literature and be replaced by the measured real lifetimes
simultaneously with the measured velocities of elementary particles.

The incorrect notions of Einstein's closed vicious circle lead to
logical
assumptions for the incorrect notions in physics such as different
times in different frames, length contraction, energy-momentum tensor,
paradox of twins, clock paradox, equivalence of mass and energy etc.
That's why it is
necessary to remove this chaos from physics and to bring the results of

classical experiments in the right proportion (the place they belong
to).

It is not possible to reject Einstein's theory of relativity by one or
by a
few experiments.
It is necessary to start from vicious circle...
The combination of the time "coordinate" with space coordinates into
space-time and vicious circle originating from this is a big
mathematical mistake.
This is deception of physicists including Einstein.

http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz

L.Vlcek