![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: did, form, stars |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ref: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/3
The rate of star formation in the universe may have peaked about five billion years ago - which is more recent than previous estimates - according to astronomers in the US and UK. The team also found that stars formed earlier in more massive galaxies, which means that that high- and low-mass galaxies have very different histories (A Heavens et al. 2004 Nature 428 625). The results could improve our understanding of how galactic structures form and evolve. Alan Heavens, Benjamin Panter and James Dunlop of Edinburgh University and Raul Jimenez of the University of Pennsylvania analysed spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey for the stellar populations of almost 100 000 stars to obtain a complete history of star formation over time. The astronomers built theoretical models of how the galaxy spectra should look and compared them to observations. "It is a bit like fingerprint identification, one looks for the best match," Jimenez told PhysicsWeb. Using a computer program called Multiple Optimised Parameter Estimation and Data Compression (MOPED), Jimenez and colleagues were able to compare the observed and predicted spectra of 96 545 galaxies in just four weeks. Without the program such a feat would have taken eight years. The astronomers calculated that star formation in the universe reached its peak about five billion years ago. It has since declined by around a factor of 10 to its present-day value. Moreover, they found that galaxies with a high mass, which include our Milky Way, formed most of their stars much earlier than galaxies with a lower mass. "The mass dependence of star-formation history explains why previous surveys showed a much earlier date for star formation, since those studies were only able to examine more massive galaxies," said Jimenez. The Pennsylvania-Edinburgh team now plans to look at more spectra and develop better theoretical models. "We need to understand how galaxies got the star formation history we find, we really do not know yet," he said. See: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/3 |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First Generation of Stars | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 49 | April 15th 04 05:20 PM |
| First Generation of Stars | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 7th 04 03:44 PM |
| Neutron Stars as Cannonballs | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 23rd 04 05:39 AM |
| STARS STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION, PART 1 | Sergey Karavashkin | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | November 8th 03 10:37 PM |
| New Theory of Stars and Formation of Planets | Louis Nielsen | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | October 9th 03 04:56 AM |