A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

When did stars form?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 8th 04 posted to sci.physics
Sam Wormley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,630
Default When did stars form?

Ref: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/3

The rate of star formation in the universe may have peaked
about five billion years ago - which is more recent than
previous estimates - according to astronomers in the US and
UK. The team also found that stars formed earlier in more
massive galaxies, which means that that high- and low-mass
galaxies have very different histories (A Heavens et al.
2004 Nature 428 625). The results could improve our
understanding of how galactic structures form and evolve.

Alan Heavens, Benjamin Panter and James Dunlop of Edinburgh
University and Raul Jimenez of the University of
Pennsylvania analysed spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky
Survey for the stellar populations of almost 100 000 stars
to obtain a complete history of star formation over time.
The astronomers built theoretical models of how the galaxy
spectra should look and compared them to observations. "It
is a bit like fingerprint identification, one looks for the
best match," Jimenez told PhysicsWeb.

Using a computer program called Multiple Optimised Parameter
Estimation and Data Compression (MOPED), Jimenez and
colleagues were able to compare the observed and predicted
spectra of 96 545 galaxies in just four weeks. Without the
program such a feat would have taken eight years.

The astronomers calculated that star formation in the
universe reached its peak about five billion years ago. It
has since declined by around a factor of 10 to its
present-day value. Moreover, they found that galaxies with a
high mass, which include our Milky Way, formed most of their
stars much earlier than galaxies with a lower mass.

"The mass dependence of star-formation history explains why
previous surveys showed a much earlier date for star
formation, since those studies were only able to examine
more massive galaxies," said Jimenez.

The Pennsylvania-Edinburgh team now plans to look at more
spectra and develop better theoretical models. "We need to
understand how galaxies got the star formation history we
find, we really do not know yet," he said.

See: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/3
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Generation of Stars Sam Wormley Physics - General Discussion 49 April 15th 04 05:20 PM
First Generation of Stars Sam Wormley Physics - General Discussion 0 April 7th 04 03:44 PM
Neutron Stars as Cannonballs Sam Wormley Physics - General Discussion 0 January 23rd 04 05:39 AM
STARS STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION, PART 1 Sergey Karavashkin Physics - General Discussion 1 November 8th 03 10:37 PM
New Theory of Stars and Formation of Planets Louis Nielsen Physics - General Discussion 2 October 9th 03 04:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Card Consolidation - Debt Help - Mobile Phone - Credit Cards - Cheap Car Insurance