A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , ,

Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 17th 03 posted to sci.physics
Pyriform
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter

S. Enterprize Company wrote:
Those that laugh first will laugh last.


That is certainly true. Those of us who were laughing at you when you
started certainly expect to be laughing at you until you stop. Indeed,
that is the only reason I haven't killfiled you. I expect to extract a
great deal more mirth at your expense.

--
Pyriform


Ads
  #2  
Old July 17th 03 posted to sci.physics
Pyriform
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter

S. Enterprize Company wrote:
I don't see any laughter. I only see people with there heads down
with a depressed look, like what they learned in graduate level
physics was a waste of time.. .


That just shows the depth of your self-delusion. Meanwhile, out in the
Real World, "graduate level" physics continues to be applied
successfully on a daily basis. You should visit sometime.

I have only one question for you. You appear to believe that your
scientific revelations are divinely inspired. Perhaps you could explain
why the Supreme Creator of the Universe should have chosen you, a
spectacularly unsuccessful advocate, through which to channel these
Important Truths. Why did he not simply convert a few eminent physicists
to belief in the Smart Model?

Or does the Devil get all the best physicists as well as all the best
tunes?

--
Pyriform




  #3  
Old July 18th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,289
Default Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter

S. Enterprize Company wrote:
I don't see any laughter. I only see people with there heads down
with a depressed look, like what they learned in graduate level
physics was a waste of time.. .


That just shows the depth of your self-delusion. Meanwhile, out in the
Real World, "graduate level" physics continues to be applied
successfully on a daily basis. You should visit sometime.


I did it is incorrect.


I have only one question for you. You appear to believe that your
scientific revelations are divinely inspired. Perhaps you could explain
why the Supreme Creator of the Universe should have chosen you, a
spectacularly unsuccessful advocate, through which to channel these
Important Truths. Why did he not simply convert a few eminent physicists
to belief in the Smart Model?



Most scientists want proof of everything so they keep God out of it because
it is hard to prove He exists scientifically, faith and believe is usually
needed. I believed in God and He worked with me in science and I gave Him the
credit. So he allowsed the wise to become mistaken fools ( QM followers) and
the humble to be intelligent. I didn't originally intend to be like a
theoretical physicist I was calle dto be that. In fact, I was turned down to be
a priest because the believed God want my science abilities. So here I am. God
again gets His credit. The Smart Model belongs to Him. It's His Glory and
Praise. I am only a servant.



Or does the Devil get all the best physicists as well as all the best
tunes?


Even the devil bows his knees to The Lord, he knows The Lord is correct. His
creation, in my opinion, had misunderstanding of the universe in it due to the
short peroiod of time to analyze it. They ( angelic belings) were made in split
seconds of time. In the slowed down sequential time view of the universe, we
can see the cause of the initial mistakes. Like I mentioned before, there are
anti-fields and fields. God placed the original head angel lucifer ( now devil)
in the anti- fields. He thought that He was by nature against God in the
anti-field because God was in the non-anti-field. But this is not true. The
structure of the universe is made of matter AND anti-matter. 2/3rd's of the
field is non-anti-field. 1/3 of the universal field is anti-field. There is
more matter than anti- matter by these proportions too. They ( the fallen
beings) see this now and regret the things they have done. Even some demons
asked for the help of Jesus ( The Lord) before he cast them out of a person
possessed.
According to The Smart Universal Model these fields can be restored back to
good if the choices of beings allow it. All beings can be saved. The
destruction, death and suffering was not the original intention of God. God
just never spoke much, His level was beyond words. Now we can see what He was
saying in a slowed down version of the universe.
Through the years anti-field energy grew with the enforcement of people's
believe. Now there are levels of christ and anti-christ. Things continue to
flow in time. What was originally evil must remain that way because once a tree
grows it can't go back and change to be something else. So here we are in
universal conflict. The Lord can change this at the end of time, He has the
power and knowledge.





--
Pyriform



Smart's First Will And Testament Song
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/BeefmeatBlues.MP3
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National No Call Law; Caller ID bullying; email spammers Archimedes Plutonium Physics - General Discussion 30 July 29th 03 02:02 AM
The law of inertia Donald G. Shead Physics - General Discussion 69 July 21st 03 08:16 AM
Relativistic mass causes no gravitation. Starblade Darksquall Physics - General Discussion 3 July 6th 03 01:57 PM
The Error in Relativistic Physics Gregory L. Hansen Physics - General Discussion 0 July 6th 03 01:14 PM
The Error in Relativistic Physics Uncle Al Physics - General Discussion 1 July 5th 03 11:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Unblock Myspace - Mortgage - Loan - Advertising - Search Engine