A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 12.0: Riccati Coefficients Yield Expansion-Contraction Transition at Golden Ratio (Phi)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 22nd 06 posted to sci.physics
OsherD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,831
Default Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 12.0: Riccati Coefficients Yield Expansion-Contraction Transition at Golden Ratio (Phi)

From Osher Doctorow

Let's look at the Riccati Differential equation:

1) dy/dt = A(t) + B(t)y + C(t)y^2

and let's choose B(t) = 1, A(t) = exp(kt), C(t) = -exp(-kt), k 0.
Then (1) becomesL

2) dy/dt = exp(kt) + y - exp(-kt)y^2

I remind readers that the Golden Ratio (phi) is the positive solution
of:

3) x^2 - x - 1 = 0

which is in fact:

4) x = (1 + sqrt(5))/2

Looking at the left hand side dy/dt of (1) or (2), we get increase
versus decrease in time, or expansion versus contraction, when dy/dt
changes from + to -, with dy/dt = 0 in between. Likewise, when dy/dt
changes from - to +, we get decrease followed by increase.

From (2), dy/dt 0 is equivalent to:


5) exp(kt) + y - exp(-kt)y^2 0

which is to say:

6) exp(kt) + y - y^2/exp(kt) 0

which is to say:

7) exp(2kt) + y exp(kt) y^2

Let's rewrite (7) as:

8) [exp(kt)]^2 + y exp(kt) y^2

It is natural, as for example in the Logistic Differential equation
subcase of the Riccati Differential equation, to restrict y to [0, 1]
or some such interval, and let's take a look now at y in (-1, 0).
Surely y^2 1 in (-1, 0), and also y = -/y/ in (-1, 0), so let's write
(8) as:

9) [exp(kt)]^2 - /y/ exp(kt) y^2

which is equivalent to:

10) [exp(kt)]^2 /y/exp(kt) + y^2

To guarantee (10), a simple condition (although perhaps not the only
one) is:

11) [exp(kt)]^2 exp(kt) + 1 exp(kt)/y/ + y^2

The second inequality holds always when y is in (-1, 0), and the first
inequality is on one side of the boundary:

12) [exp(kt)]^2 = exp(kt) + 1

which readers will recognize more easily as (letting x = exp(kt)):

13) x^2 - x - 1 = 0

which yields the positive solution x = phi (the Golden Ratio). When x
phi, it is easy to prove that the first inequality of (11) holds because (d/dx)(x^2 - x - 1) = 2x - 1 0 iff x 1/2 and for x = exp(kt) with k 0, we have x 1/2 always. So the question is, when is x = exp(kt) phi? We have:


14) exp(kt) = phi iff kt = log(phi)

and with exp(kt) increasing for k 0 with t, we have:

15) exp(kt) phi iff t log(phi)/k

So late in time (t log(phi)/k ), we get expansion of y via dy/dt 0.


Osher Doctorow

Ads
  #3  
Old August 22nd 06 posted to sci.physics
Tom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 12.0: Riccati Coefficients Yield Expansion-Contraction Transition at Golden Ratio (Phi)


"OsherD" wrote in message
ps.com...
From Osher Doctorow


Assuming that t is nonnegative and begins at 0, notice what happens at
t = 0:

1) dy/dt = exp(kt) + y - exp(-kt)y^2 = 1 + y - y^2 = 1 -/y/ - y^2


the solution is wrong. and why did you replace y with -/y/ ?


To have dy/dt negative at t = 0, we requi


what is the reason to have dy/dt negative at t=0 ??



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 9.0: Surprising Relationships of Riccati y-y^2 OsherD Physics - General Discussion 2 August 19th 06 08:16 PM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 5.0: How To Use the Riccati Equation Oppositely to Gravitation OsherD Physics - General Discussion 8 August 16th 06 04:15 AM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.9: EMA Via Riccati Differential Equation OsherD Physics - General Discussion 3 August 14th 06 07:11 AM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.8: Lambert's W, FIbonacci Numbers, Feigenbaum constant, Golden Ratio, Logistic Map and Riccati Differential equation, Fine Structure Constant OsherD Physics - General Discussion 2 August 7th 06 04:17 AM
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues OsherD Physics - General Discussion 4 July 25th 06 02:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Fairings - Loans - Switch Energy Supplier - Your File Host - Data Entry Made Easy