Correction

However, if I am not mistaken I think that a drastic overhaul of the
known laws of physics is needed for this problem.

should have been in

“But maybe the laws themselves need to be changed." George Dvali Feb
2004 Scientific American

JS: That is "too cheap" as Albert Einstein mistakenly told David Bohm
about his information “BIT” “pilot wave” plus particle “IT” quantum
theory. Bohm’s “ontological” theory gave a deeper meaning to Niels
Bohr’s “epistemological” theory that John Archibald Wheeler summarized
as “IT FROM BIT.” However, if I am not mistaken I think that a drastic
overhaul of the known laws of physics is not needed for this problem.

Jack Sarfatti wrote in message om...
Correction

However, if I am not mistaken I think that a drastic overhaul of the
known laws of physics is needed for this problem.

should have been in

“But maybe the laws themselves need to be changed." George Dvali Feb
2004 Scientific American

JS: That is "too cheap" as Albert Einstein mistakenly told David Bohm
about his information “BIT” “pilot wave” plus particle “IT” quantum
theory. Bohm’s “ontological” theory gave a deeper meaning to Niels
Bohr’s “epistemological” theory that John Archibald Wheeler summarized
as “IT FROM BIT.” However, if I am not mistaken I think that a drastic
overhaul of the known laws of physics is not needed for this problem.

Einstein was not mistaken. Since Bohm didn't have a
pilot wave, he had a causal wave. Founded on what else?
Newtonian Physics.

The Laws Of Physics obviously don't need *any* overhauling.
Since the only place that they even exist to begin with
are The Harvard University Library.