A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

The Smart Model Theory - Note about E= hf and E=mc^2



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 14th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default The Smart Model Theory - Note about E= hf and E=mc^2

The Smart Model Theory - Note about E= hf and E=mc^2

When I used these equations in some parts of the Smart Theory, it is to be
interpreted as

c = near the speed of light NOT the speed of light

and

when h is used Planck's constant, it was used only in special cases for
approximations in the analysis of the Compton's Wavelenght, at my website.

E= hf works only in special cases of blackbodies. It doesn't work in all
cases. h isn't constant in all cases, according to The Smart Theory.

So if you see it at my Website, don't be confused as to it's use. In fact, I
will make corrections at my website later concerning this.


S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Ads
  #2  
Old July 14th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default The Smart Model Theory - Note about E= hf and E=mc^2

I will be making a few updates to the Smart Model Theory later. Wow. For a
while, I even believed E= mc^2 was correct. When I did the analysis with
particle accelerator energy comparisons, I could then see it was not correct. I
even when so far as to say

Pdv = mc^2

Where the helix spiral field energy field pressure was related to the total
energy of the particle or atom ( E = Mc^2). This is incorrect. I see now.

Pdv = Rotational Energy of particle or atom

In the derivation, I assumed Einstein was correct about the total energy of a
particle or atom. I will make the corrections later to The Smart Model Theory.
It's only a minor correction. The Smart Model still works fine. And it is even
more accurate now, than it ever was.


S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Smart Model is the atomic model of the future whether you like it or not... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 July 13th 03 11:44 AM
If The Smart Model is Correct... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 5 July 13th 03 04:53 AM
Smart Model Singularity Is Much More Correct Than Hawking's Belief.... . S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 July 11th 03 04:43 AM
Smart Model Singularity Is Much More Correct Than Hawking's Belief.... . S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 July 10th 03 01:38 AM
Vortex State for Superconductors vs. The Smart Model S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 2 July 9th 03 06:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Xbox Mod Chips - Loans - Compare - MPAA - Electricity