Ref: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp

Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns

Revved-up particles, namely quarks, spinning inside neutrons in the
opposite direction to that of the neutrons themselves, challenge the
prevailing model of how quarks behave.

See: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp

Sam Wormley
Date: 1/3/2004 7:02 AM Pacific Standard Time
Wrote in:
Message-id:


Ref: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp

Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns

Revved-up particles, namely quarks, spinning inside neutrons in the
opposite direction to that of the neutrons themselves, challenge the
prevailing model of how quarks behave.


Sam, why do you continue to think the quark model is the cats meow after the
models many long standing (40 year old) defaults, unsolvable by the finest
minds available.

Any thinking person would conclude that the quark model is finally taking on
the dimensions of a fraud, and should be abandoned.

Forever unanswered quark questions.

The source for theoretical quark spin?

How (why) are the theoretical u,d,s,t,b quarks constructed from energy?

What is the source for the theoretical quarks unprecedented fractional
(+-1/3) (+-2/3) charges?

Why can't the quark proton and neutron model give (n-1H) energy, so important
in nuclear physics?

Why can't the quark model give proton and neutron mass ratios and magnetic
moments?

Why can't the quark model for the proton and neutron allow calculating the
binding energy of the deuteron?

Regards: Tom:
Tom Lockyer (77 and retired)
"If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows
it can't be done." Henry Ford.

ThomasL283 wrote:


Sam, why do you continue to think the quark model is the cats meow after the
models many long standing (40 year old) defaults, unsolvable by the finest
minds available.


Tom--The quark model successes
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22qu...l%22+successes

Ref: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp

Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns

Revved-up particles, namely quarks, spinning inside neutrons in the
opposite direction to that of the neutrons themselves, challenge the
prevailing model of how quarks behave.

See: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp

What's wrong Swormley The QM and Standard Model starting to look wrong to
everyone? They are just starting to describe the Smart Model.

Cranks Of Physics
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/CRANKS.html


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

"Sam Wormley" wrote in message
...
ThomasL283 wrote:


Sam, why do you continue to think the quark model is the cats meow after
the
models many long standing (40 year old) defaults, unsolvable by the
finest
minds available.


Tom--The quark model successes
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22qu...l%22+successes

Google hits "quark model" successes = 919
Google hits "bohr model" successes = 243
Google hits "maxwell model" successes = 17

I think what Wormly is trying to say,
is that the newer the model,
and the less cost-effective it is,
the more Google hits you will get touting its' "successes".

I suspect that the folks who are interested in
viable and cost-effective models of reality
use those that work best,
and that the people who are interested in
looting the taxpayers,
use new models that lend themselves to obfuscation.