A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Origin of Gravity and Dark Energy



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 31st 03 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.skeptic,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.physics
Jack Sarfatti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,218
Default Origin of Gravity and Dark Energy

Key paper is T. W. B. Kibble's "Lorentz Invariance and the Gravitational
Field" JMP 1961 reproduced in "Gauge Theories in the Twentieth Century"
John C Taylor, Imperial College Press (2001), p. 119.

R. Utiyama Phys. Rev. 101, 1597 (1956) applied the local gauge force
principle (e.g. Yang-Mills for weak and strong forces Phys. Rev 96, 191
(1954) anticipating modern QCD and standard U(1)SU(2)SU(3) model with 17
- 25 free parameters) not to the 4-parameter translation subgroup of the
Poincare group, but to the 6-parameter Lorentz group of rigid
space-time rotations. Kibble points out problems with Utiyama's
approach and instead includes the 4-parameter translation subgroup, i.e.
the entire Poincare group leaving out the 5 additional parameters
(dilation and hyperbolic uniform acceleration) of the zero rest mass
conformal group used by Roger Penrose in twistor theory.

Kibble finds that there is a small torsion field coupling only when
Tuv(Matter) =/= 0 and that Einstein's

Ruv = 0

is obeyed in "vacuum". This was before the recent discovery of "dark
energy" that Mike Turner says may well be w = pressure/energy density =
-1 exotic vacuum with dominating negative pressure causing the Universe
to accelerate its expansion rather than slowing down. This issue is
still controversial due to recent NEWTON data as interpreted by some.
It's too early to know.

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does Dark Energy Exist? Meaning of Einstein's Gravity Jack Sarfatti Physics - General Discussion 1 December 31st 03 07:22 PM
Dark Matter vs Dark Energy greywolf42 Current Physics Research (Moderated) 7 September 11th 03 08:36 PM
Monopoles [was Dark Matter vs Dark Energy] - an EPT philosophical comment from a Bright Peter F Physics - General Discussion 0 August 31st 03 03:15 AM
magnetic monopoles vs quantization of electric charge (was: Dark Matter vs Dark Energy) Jonathan Thornburg Current Physics Research (Moderated) 15 August 23rd 03 09:05 PM
no dark matter or dark energy sol aisenberg Physics - General Discussion 2 July 23rd 03 03:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Katalog firm - Download DVD movies - Loans - Wire Transfer - Loans