Is there not even one person here to challenge me here in Physics?

All PhD's back down or hide from me. Why? The Smart Model is beyond their
intelligence level.




Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

S. Enterprize Company wrote:
Is there not even one person here to challenge me here in Physics?

All PhD's back down or hide from me. Why? The Smart Model is beyond their
intelligence level.

The proper challenge to a theory is experiment. Physics is not forensic
debating or disputation. What does your theory predict that mainline
theories do not. If there is such, what experiments back it up. In the
absence of experiment, what you have is chit chat and chin gab.

Bob Kolker

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:

Is there not even one person here to challenge me here in Physics?

Even Dumb Donny ****Head knows more than you do - though said sum of
knowledge could fit in a flea's navel and still leave room for three
grains of pepper.

http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html
http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

Is there not even one person here to challenge me here in Physics?


Oops Correction :

not challenge me, challenge the validity of The Smart Model


All PhD's back down or hide from me.
Oop Correction: not me, The Smart Model

Why? The Smart Model is beyond their
intelligence level.



Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

S. Enterprize Company wrote:
Is there not even one person here to challenge me here in Physics?

All PhD's back down or hide from me. Why? The Smart Model is beyond
their
intelligence level.

The proper challenge to a theory is experiment. Physics is not forensic
debating or disputation. What does your theory predict that mainline
theories do not. If there is such, what
Well like for one The Smart Model predicted the ring shape of oxygen and the
deuterium atoms that make it. Then about 10 years later real atomic images
verify it as proof.


experiments back it up. In the
absence of experiment, what you have is chit chat and chin gab.

Bob Kolker




Oops sorry, not a challenge to me, The Smart Model as the next Physics Model of
the future, for the benefit of Mankind.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:

Is there not even one person here to challenge me here in Physics?

Even Dumb Donny ****Head knows more than you do - though said sum of
knowledge could fit in a flea's navel and still leave room for three
grains of pepper.


Oops sorry, not a challenge to me, The Smart Model... .
So far not one person has been able to prove it wrong for the last 10 years.



Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:

Is there not even one person here to challenge me here in Physics?

Oops Correction :

not challenge me, challenge the validity of The Smart Model


Neither are worth the effort. Why bother this crank crap.

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:

Is there not even one person here to challenge me here in Physics?

Oops Correction :

not challenge me, challenge the validity of The Smart Model


Neither are worth the effort. Why bother this crank crap.




Because it has never been proven to be wrong for almost 10 years... .


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote:

Because it has never been proven to be wrong for almost 10 years... .


Hahhahha hahha hah ah ahhahhah h!
You don't even understand photons.

Does light have mass?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...ight_mass.html

Did you ever wonder "What the heck is a photon, anyway?"
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/photon/schmoton.htm

Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...odynamics.html
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...Mechanics.html

Crank Information
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22sm...Awww.crank.net

On 15 Dec 2003 23:40:48 GMT, (S. Enterprize Company)
wrote:

Is there not even one person here to challenge me here in Physics?

All PhD's back down or hide from me. Why? The Smart Model is beyond their
intelligence level.




Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


The smart model is lacking in at least one important aspect:

"Light is everywhere all the time. It's only made visible when
vibrated. No aether or particles needed."

Challenge that!.

Jim