If you do a Google Search on my name "James Harris" and math, like you
put in "James Harris" math, you'll currently see a link to
www.crank.net coming up third, and I don't know how many of you know
that site is run by a guy named Erik Max Francis who used to be a
regular sci.math poster.

I want you to do that search, look at what he has on me, and please
explain to me exactly why this person is calling me names, like, what
makes me a crackpot.

Can *any* of you go there to what he has and tell me what's supposed
to be so bad about what I'm doing?

Some people talk about going to look for something like an important
math result, and others try quietly. So I talk about my efforts on
Usenet.

What's so wrong with that? Why do I rate such an intense and active
reaction from the math community?

Why do mathematicians and math groupies spend so much time and effort,
create webpages, etc. to bother with my attempts at finding some
important math?

What gives?

Can any of you explain their behavior to me?

I'm curious.


James Harris

James Harris wrote:
If you do a Google Search on my name "James Harris" and math, like you
put in "James Harris" math, you'll currently see a link to
www.crank.net coming up third, and I don't know how many of you know
that site is run by a guy named Erik Max Francis who used to be a
regular sci.math poster.

Thanks for the link James, this site is going top give me hours of
amusement...

I want you to do that search, look at what he has on me, and please
Several lines of whinging snipped.
James Harris

Mark Atherton

James Harris wrote:

If you do a Google Search on my name "James Harris" and math, like you
put in "James Harris" math, you'll currently see a link to
www.crank.net coming up third, and I don't know how many of you know
that site is run by a guy named Erik Max Francis who used to be a
regular sci.math poster.

I want you to do that search, look at what he has on me, and please
explain to me exactly why this person is calling me names, like, what
makes me a crackpot.

Can *any* of you go there to what he has and tell me what's supposed
to be so bad about what I'm doing?

Some people talk about going to look for something like an important
math result, and others try quietly. So I talk about my efforts on
Usenet.

What's so wrong with that? Why do I rate such an intense and active
reaction from the math community?

Why do mathematicians and math groupies spend so much time and effort,
create webpages, etc. to bother with my attempts at finding some
important math?

What gives?

Can any of you explain their behavior to me?

I'm curious.

James Harris

You are failing to take into account that you are wrong! And
you ignore correct information about why you are wrong... just
like other cranks.

"James Harris" wrote in message
...

Oh please, you NPD afflicted loser! You are such a LIAR and CHEAT and you
are a super-troll and a super-crank!

Just look at some of the quotes from you below! This has been going on for
8 years now and you are about as close to a proof as you were before you
started, you ignoramus!

"James Harris" wrote in message
m...

Mathematicians are so ****ing stupid. I hate mathematicians.

It's not my fault you dimwits just came close to the elegant
function!!!

I found it, so play fair!!! Put my partial difference equation in the
textbooks!

You stupid ****ing twit mathematicians.


James Harris

In article ,
James Harris wrote:
If you ****ing morons think that I will let you get away with not
giving me credit for my ****ing math discoveries then you have another
****ing thing coming.

What the ****??!!!

Where's "pure math" now, huh? Where's loving math for the ****ing
beauty of it now you ****ing ****s??!!!

LOOK AT IT!!!


***

You're still trying to **** with me David Moran because NOTHING in
what Arturo Magidin is doing makes any sense MATHEMATICALLY!!!

I don't know what's ****ing wrong with you people, or why you think
that you can come here and bull**** for eternity without consequence,
but I'm ****ing tired of the stupidity. I'm ****ing tired of the
nonsense.

I'm ****ing tired of people coming in here and saying bull**** as if
mathematics is just some useless game and the truth doesn't matter.

You need to quit ****ing around David Moran. You, Randy Poe, and
Arturo Magidin among others needs to get a ****ING CLUE!!!

James Harris

Mr. Harris,

you a liar, cheat and crank! You are perhaps the rudest person I have come
across on Usenet and continue to try to propagate lies!

Just look at your correspondence below, you disgust me and you have zero to
show for it!

You will never have a proof of anything as you don't understand the meaning
of the word!

What you need is a crank.net (oops, we have that) and a doctor with strong
drugs!


"James Harris" wrote in message
...
(James Harris) wrote in message
om...
(Randy Poe) wrote in message
. com...
(James Harris) wrote in message
m...
(Thomas Bushnell, BSG) wrote in message
...
(James Harris) writes:

Readers should note that I questioned the sanity of claiming that
5
can play the role of a variable, and the poster Andrzej Kolowski
deleted out what came after "Hmmm...".

What is "the role of a variable"?

Good question. Ask Andrzej Kolowski as he came up with the insanity.

Well, perhaps if you didn't keep snipping what he writes
after "play the role of a variable, that is..." you'd
understand what he means by the term play the role of
a variable.

Here's yet another post demonstrated that Randy Poe can't be taken
seriously on mathematical topics.

This was not a mathematical question, but a question of how
to read a posting in the English language. You asked,
repeatedly, what a poster meant by a phrase. He kept
posting his explanation, you kept snipping it. I'm
pointing out that what HE meant by the phrase can be
found after the words "that is..." in the construction

"play the role of a variable, that is [several lines
of text and mathematics]".

Nice attempt to change the players and the topic again,
but too obvious. Everybody has a newsreader with history
after all.


What the ****? What in the hell did that **** MEAN mathematically?

What is this, a math newsgroup, or some ****ing English class?

When you seem to have trouble understanding a basic
English construction in a mathematical argument, I feel
I can be helpful


I'm telling you Randy Poe just CANNOT be taken seriously about math!!!

But as you just admitted, the exchange between you and me
was not about math was it? It was about the construction of
a mathematical statement in English. The content is
mathematics, but you seem lost on a basic point of
English. Otherwise, why keep clipping the part after
"that is..." and asking again, "what does he mean by
this phrase"?

See? Isn't that easy? So sorry your delete key keeps
slipping.

You're just ****ing STUPID Randy Poe,

Well, I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt
in pretending to believe that you accidentally edit
people's posts this way. I agree, this is a pose of
deliberate naivety. But it keeps things civil you
see (as opposed to your remark). Because if I were
to outright accuse you of deliberately distorting
people's remarks, of deleting explanatory text and
then pretending it never existed, I'd have to make
some moral accusations, wouldn't I? Then where would
we be?

and I just find myself
infuriated that numbskulls like yourself are so damn active and
annoying yet you don't say things that make any sense.

What the ****??!!!

Civil, civil.

If I were to go down that path, that's where we'd be.
Instead, since you go there alone, I don't need to
get into a flame war, something that provides me
no amusement.

- Randy

"James Harris" wrote in message
...
If you do a Google Search on my name "James Harris" and math, like you
put in "James Harris" math, you'll currently see a link to
www.crank.net coming up third, and I don't know how many of you know
that site is run by a guy named Erik Max Francis who used to be a
regular sci.math poster.

I want you to do that search, look at what he has on me, and please
explain to me exactly why this person is calling me names, like, what
makes me a crackpot.

Can *any* of you go there to what he has and tell me what's supposed
to be so bad about what I'm doing?

Some people talk about going to look for something like an important
math result, and others try quietly. So I talk about my efforts on
Usenet.

What's so wrong with that? Why do I rate such an intense and active
reaction from the math community?

Why do mathematicians and math groupies spend so much time and effort,
create webpages, etc. to bother with my attempts at finding some
important math?

What gives?

Can any of you explain their behavior to me?

I'm curious.


James Harris

Let's see..........You try to get people fired from their jobs, you call
everyone names, you cuss at everyone, and you threaten everyone you
encounter. Yep, you're a crank.

David Moran

"James Harris" wrote in message
...
If you do a Google Search on my name "James Harris" and math, like you
put in "James Harris" math, you'll currently see a link to
www.crank.net coming up third

For good reason... you are a crank Harris.

James Harris wrote:

If you do a Google Search on my name "James Harris" and math, like you
put in "James Harris" math, you'll currently see a link to
www.crank.net coming up third,
[snip]

We know.

http://www.crank.net/harris.html
It's not every braying jackass that gets a whole page at crank.net

Hey stooopid loud troll James Harris, put up or shut up,

http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/c...oring/faq.html
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/c...g/numbers.html

Is a $10,000 prize no questions asked too small to justify your
submission of two little prime numbers?

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

"flip" wrote in message
...
Mr. Harris,

you a liar, cheat and crank! You are perhaps the rudest person I have
come
across on Usenet and continue to try to propagate lies!

I beg your pardon. All healthy newgroups seem to have recurring problem
posters.

For example, read rec.skiing.alpine.

(James Harris) wrote in message m...
If you do a Google Search on my name "James Harris" and math, like you
put in "James Harris" math, you'll currently see a link to
www.crank.net coming up third, and I don't know how many of you know
that site is run by a guy named Erik Max Francis who used to be a
regular sci.math poster.

I want you to do that search, look at what he has on me, and please
explain to me exactly why this person is calling me names, like, what
makes me a crackpot.

Can *any* of you go there to what he has and tell me what's supposed
to be so bad about what I'm doing?

Some people talk about going to look for something like an important
math result, and others try quietly. So I talk about my efforts on
Usenet.

What's so wrong with that? Why do I rate such an intense and active
reaction from the math community?

Why do mathematicians and math groupies spend so much time and effort,
create webpages, etc. to bother with my attempts at finding some
important math?

What gives?

Can any of you explain their behavior to me?

I'm curious.


James Harris

You are too stupid to remember the crap you have posted.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e... g.google.com

Here is a line from the post...
*******************
Believe it or not, it was kind of fun being one of the number one
"cranks" on the newsgroup.
*******************

You, one of the biggest tools around, are the author of the post I
referenced!

It was fun then, but now you are whining? Pathetic.

Have a nice day,
Jay