At any particular time and place, the weight of a mass is a constant. Does
everyone know why it slowly changes?

"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

At any particular time and place, the weight of a mass is a constant. Does
everyone know why it slowly changes?

http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf

You aren't even a self consistent idiot, ****Head, not even within two
consecutive sentences. Mass is invariant. Do you have some
ineluctable psychotic mechanism for disappearing atoms? (Rhetorical
question.)

Uncle Al would stay to whack your atropied cerebropee-pee some more,
but his woman has approached wearing naught but a thong pantie -
backwards. I am going to plumb the depths of depravity.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

On 28-Jun-2003, "Donald G. Shead" wrote:

At any particular time and place, the weight of a mass is a constant. Does
everyone know why it slowly changes?

Mr. Shead:

I don't know why it changes, but I have done eperiments where it changed in
place.

I put a levitation model of my system on a scale calibrfated to both ounces
and grams.

When I turned the package around on the scale, it changed weight in place,
or at least it changed registration of weight in place. It is in the form
of a rectangular cube, sort of, which makes it siz-sided. I tested it with
all six sides as the side contacting the scale. It varied by as much as 4
grams, and returned to weeight registrations for givenpositions.

I then got a balance scale and repeated the test.

Of course, the change is registered in acceleration with this type scale,
and there was a definite difference as the scale containing the package
accelerated from one position to another, either up or down.

At no time did I reposition the scale or the balance lever scale during the
manipulation of the package on the surface or in the pan.

Assuming the force of g was constant at the given location, it seemed to me
that the weight of the mass had to change.

No explanation. Merely an anomaly I ran across in doing experiments with my
own work. No one has, to my knowledge, reproduced thise xperiment
independently, although I had reported it once or twice in the past. No
solution as yet, other than, 'You were seeing things.'

Maginsta

I shall recomment that users of the kit I inend to put outshould try to do
the experiment and see what their results are. All I can see is 'weight
changes in place.'

On 29-Jun-2003, DarkMatter
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 07:23:39 GMT, Gave us:

snipped odd crap...

I shall recomment that users of the kit I inend to put outshould try to
do
the experiment and see what their results are. All I can see is
'weight
changes in place.'


Can I laugh now?

Do whatever you like. I reported something I did. You don't like it,
fine.

Got clue?

And what is this?

Maginsta

At any time and place, the mass and inertia of any weight is a constant.
Does everyone know why this is so?

"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

At any time and place, the mass and inertia of any weight is a constant.
Does everyone know why this is so?

Bull****, ****Head. Weight is arbitrary. There is nothing enforcing
time invariance of weight. In case you are so stooopid as to be
unable to comprehend this, look at the tines of a struck tuning fork
held horizontal.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

At any time and place, the mass and inertia of any weight is a constant.
Does everyone know why this is so?

Bull****, ****Head. Weight is arbitrary.

Why you nitwit: how can you say such a thing? Why do we have laws that
require weight scales to be certified, and inspectors to enforce honest
labeling of packages?

The numbers for weight are arbitrary in that ounces, pounds, and newtons are
not numerically the same, but the mass and inertia of any weight is a
constant; anytime, and anyplace.

There is nothing enforcing
time invariance of weight. In case you are so stooopid as to be
unable to comprehend this, look at the tines of a struck tuning fork
held horizontal.

The relative changes in the positions of the celestial bodies around any
weight cause it to vary; with time:

As to tuning forks; you have superficial powers of observation.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

At any time and place, the mass and inertia of any weight is a constant.
Does everyone know why this is so?

Bull****, ****Head. Weight is arbitrary.

Why you nitwit: how can you say such a thing? Why do we have laws that
require weight scales to be certified, and inspectors to enforce honest
labeling of packages?

When the moon is overhead everything weighs less. You don't know the
difference between science and groundling bull****.

The numbers for weight are arbitrary in that ounces, pounds, and newtons are
not numerically the same, but the mass and inertia of any weight is a
constant; anytime, and anyplace.

There is nothing enforcing
time invariance of weight. In case you are so stooopid as to be
unable to comprehend this, look at the tines of a struck tuning fork
held horizontal.

The relative changes in the positions of the celestial bodies around any
weight cause it to vary; with time:

As to tuning forks; you have superficial powers of observation.

Refractorily ignorant asshole. If the tines are vibrating in a
horizontal plane they are constantly sinusoidally varying via Special
Relativity. If they are vibrating in a vertical plane, they are
varying by both Special and General Relativity. A superconducting
dual-mass levitated gravimeter can precisely detect the change in
gravity due to a one cm change in elevation. The moon is a huge
measured difference. Not only is weight vs. height and time trivially
variable in theory, it can be reproducibly measured real world at
will,

http://www.gwrinstruments.com/GWR_ctspec.html
http://www.gwrinstruments.com/GWR_rw13et.html

http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf

****head.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

On 29-Jun-2003, DarkMatter
wrote:

I shall recomment that users of the kit I inend to put outshould try
to
do
the experiment and see what their results are. All I can see is
'weight
changes in place.'


Can I laugh now?

Do whatever you like. I reported something I did. You don't like it,
fine.


Bwahahahahaha....

You have my condolences.

Maginsta