A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

The Born Rule is a Anthropic Transformation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 30th 03 posted to sci.physics
Douglas Eagleson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 52
Default The Born Rule is a Anthropic Transformation

If string theory people are looking for a way to alter the theory to a
beautiful field theory, use the Born Rule as the transform.

It actually was used to alter the Copenhagen to the rather boring type
of statistical non-real-anthropic theory.

A test of the correct type of theory is a relation theory, rather than
any other type. And if mathematical quanta are hard to state as
relations, then foundational questions interfere.

Making the derivation of the Born Rule the real test.

So, go derive that first, then go figure out algebra.

Real space, is measured with a real ruler. Making real quantum theory
apply to radio towers spaced with a surveyor's measuring tape. No
abstract space!!!!
Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory
paramenter, in total or in part.

So take the string in the theory and make it the correct form for the
outcome of all theory. And here begins a derivation of the Born Rule.

Except you need to do that.



Douglas Eagleson
Gaithersburg, MD USA
Ads
  #2  
Old November 30th 03 posted to sci.physics
Robert J. Kolker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,291
Default The Born Rule is a Anthropic Transformation



Douglas Eagleson wrote:

Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory
paramenter, in total or in part.


All experimental data is a poteriori. You probably meant to say make
experimentally proved data the primary part of the theory. An a priori
proposition is one that can be proven without reference to empricial data.

Worry not about quantum theory. It is the most empirically verified
physical theory we have.

Bob Kolker



  #3  
Old November 30th 03 posted to sci.physics
gis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default The Born Rule is a Anthropic Transformation

string theory is getting old...........

very boring........



"Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message
m...
If string theory people are looking for a way to alter the theory to a
beautiful field theory, use the Born Rule as the transform.

It actually was used to alter the Copenhagen to the rather boring type
of statistical non-real-anthropic theory.

A test of the correct type of theory is a relation theory, rather than
any other type. And if mathematical quanta are hard to state as
relations, then foundational questions interfere.

Making the derivation of the Born Rule the real test.

So, go derive that first, then go figure out algebra.

Real space, is measured with a real ruler. Making real quantum theory
apply to radio towers spaced with a surveyor's measuring tape. No
abstract space!!!!
Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory
paramenter, in total or in part.

So take the string in the theory and make it the correct form for the
outcome of all theory. And here begins a derivation of the Born Rule.

Except you need to do that.



Douglas Eagleson
Gaithersburg, MD USA



  #4  
Old November 30th 03 posted to sci.physics
Anthony Cerrato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default The Born Rule is a Anthropic Transformation


"gis" wrote in message
...
string theory is getting old...........

very boring........



"Douglas Eagleson" wrote in

message
m...

[snip]

I am presently working on an adaptation of string thy which
I call, Cat's Cradle thy. It is very beautiful;
unfortunately the outline of the math proof of the thy is
too extensive to fit on this page. (In fact the proof itself
may ultimately contain an infinite number of lines and be
inaccessible to those in a 4D universe.) ...tonyC


  #5  
Old November 30th 03 posted to sci.physics
Douglas Eagleson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 52
Default The Born Rule is a Anthropic Transformation

"Robert J. Kolker" wrote in message ...
Douglas Eagleson wrote:

Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory
paramenter, in total or in part.


All experimental data is a poteriori. You probably meant to say make
experimentally proved data the primary part of the theory. An a priori
proposition is one that can be proven without reference to empricial data.

Worry not about quantum theory. It is the most empirically verified
physical theory we have.

Bob Kolker


Wrong, It changes the theory to where the experiment has another form.

Making it another theory altogether!

So it can be another theory even better agreeing with other experiments.
  #6  
Old November 30th 03 posted to sci.physics
Douglas Eagleson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 52
Default The Born Rule is a Anthropic Transformation

"gis" wrote in message ...
string theory is getting old...........

very boring........



"Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message
m...
If string theory people are looking for a way to alter the theory to a
beautiful field theory, use the Born Rule as the transform.

It actually was used to alter the Copenhagen to the rather boring type
of statistical non-real-anthropic theory.

A test of the correct type of theory is a relation theory, rather than
any other type. And if mathematical quanta are hard to state as
relations, then foundational questions interfere.

Making the derivation of the Born Rule the real test.

So, go derive that first, then go figure out algebra.

Real space, is measured with a real ruler. Making real quantum theory
apply to radio towers spaced with a surveyor's measuring tape. No
abstract space!!!!
Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory
paramenter, in total or in part.

So take the string in the theory and make it the correct form for the
outcome of all theory. And here begins a derivation of the Born Rule.

Except you need to do that.



Douglas Eagleson
Gaithersburg, MD USA



It is a theory that is close to the correct kind though. And to get
it to the original Heisenburg quanta, of third abstract form, the Born
Rule may assist!

That would make it useful and very fun a modified string!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Right hand rule David Moran Physics - General Discussion 21 October 26th 03 07:11 PM
What's the rule regarding 'ones' in algebra? Donald G. Shead Physics - General Discussion 17 September 24th 03 10:42 AM
What's the rule about using 'ones' in algebra? Donald G. Shead Physics - General Discussion 8 September 22nd 03 10:41 PM
What's the rule about using 'ones' in algebra? Donald G. Shead Physics - General Discussion 12 September 22nd 03 10:25 PM
Born on QM and credit to Einstein Patrick Reany Physics - General Discussion 0 July 13th 03 03:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Loans - Mortgage Calculator - Search Engine - Cheap Loan