![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: anthropic, born, rule, transformation |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
If string theory people are looking for a way to alter the theory to a
beautiful field theory, use the Born Rule as the transform. It actually was used to alter the Copenhagen to the rather boring type of statistical non-real-anthropic theory. A test of the correct type of theory is a relation theory, rather than any other type. And if mathematical quanta are hard to state as relations, then foundational questions interfere. Making the derivation of the Born Rule the real test. So, go derive that first, then go figure out algebra. Real space, is measured with a real ruler. Making real quantum theory apply to radio towers spaced with a surveyor's measuring tape. No abstract space!!!! Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory paramenter, in total or in part. So take the string in the theory and make it the correct form for the outcome of all theory. And here begins a derivation of the Born Rule. Except you need to do that. Douglas Eagleson Gaithersburg, MD USA |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Douglas Eagleson wrote: Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory paramenter, in total or in part. All experimental data is a poteriori. You probably meant to say make experimentally proved data the primary part of the theory. An a priori proposition is one that can be proven without reference to empricial data. Worry not about quantum theory. It is the most empirically verified physical theory we have. Bob Kolker |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
string theory is getting old...........
very boring........ "Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message m... If string theory people are looking for a way to alter the theory to a beautiful field theory, use the Born Rule as the transform. It actually was used to alter the Copenhagen to the rather boring type of statistical non-real-anthropic theory. A test of the correct type of theory is a relation theory, rather than any other type. And if mathematical quanta are hard to state as relations, then foundational questions interfere. Making the derivation of the Born Rule the real test. So, go derive that first, then go figure out algebra. Real space, is measured with a real ruler. Making real quantum theory apply to radio towers spaced with a surveyor's measuring tape. No abstract space!!!! Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory paramenter, in total or in part. So take the string in the theory and make it the correct form for the outcome of all theory. And here begins a derivation of the Born Rule. Except you need to do that. Douglas Eagleson Gaithersburg, MD USA |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"gis" wrote in message ... string theory is getting old........... very boring........ "Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message m... [snip] I am presently working on an adaptation of string thy which I call, Cat's Cradle thy. It is very beautiful; unfortunately the outline of the math proof of the thy is too extensive to fit on this page. (In fact the proof itself may ultimately contain an infinite number of lines and be inaccessible to those in a 4D universe.) ...tonyC |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert J. Kolker" wrote in message ...
Douglas Eagleson wrote: Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory paramenter, in total or in part. All experimental data is a poteriori. You probably meant to say make experimentally proved data the primary part of the theory. An a priori proposition is one that can be proven without reference to empricial data. Worry not about quantum theory. It is the most empirically verified physical theory we have. Bob Kolker Wrong, It changes the theory to where the experiment has another form. Making it another theory altogether! So it can be another theory even better agreeing with other experiments. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"gis" wrote in message ...
string theory is getting old........... very boring........ "Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message m... If string theory people are looking for a way to alter the theory to a beautiful field theory, use the Born Rule as the transform. It actually was used to alter the Copenhagen to the rather boring type of statistical non-real-anthropic theory. A test of the correct type of theory is a relation theory, rather than any other type. And if mathematical quanta are hard to state as relations, then foundational questions interfere. Making the derivation of the Born Rule the real test. So, go derive that first, then go figure out algebra. Real space, is measured with a real ruler. Making real quantum theory apply to radio towers spaced with a surveyor's measuring tape. No abstract space!!!! Hands on space, where the experimental a priori is the theory paramenter, in total or in part. So take the string in the theory and make it the correct form for the outcome of all theory. And here begins a derivation of the Born Rule. Except you need to do that. Douglas Eagleson Gaithersburg, MD USA It is a theory that is close to the correct kind though. And to get it to the original Heisenburg quanta, of third abstract form, the Born Rule may assist! That would make it useful and very fun a modified string! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Right hand rule | David Moran | Physics - General Discussion | 21 | October 26th 03 07:11 PM |
| What's the rule regarding 'ones' in algebra? | Donald G. Shead | Physics - General Discussion | 17 | September 24th 03 10:42 AM |
| What's the rule about using 'ones' in algebra? | Donald G. Shead | Physics - General Discussion | 8 | September 22nd 03 10:41 PM |
| What's the rule about using 'ones' in algebra? | Donald G. Shead | Physics - General Discussion | 12 | September 22nd 03 10:25 PM |
| Born on QM and credit to Einstein | Patrick Reany | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 13th 03 03:18 PM |