In a sense the neutron is a fusion-particle in that it fuses together
the nuclei
of several protons, which without neutrons would fly apart.

The muon is another fusion particle. And the muon goes right up
against and approaches the Fusion Barrier Principle of 67% breakeven.
In fact the muon in experiments (Nagamine in England) has reached 67%
breakeven but impossible to improve that performance.

So, the neutron offers us another course of experiments to perform,
and a parallel course to collaborate of the muon 67% achievement. If
FBP is correct then the neutron ability to fuse or hold together
protons should also not exceed 67% breakeven. And, in effect, the
Periodic Chart of Chemical Elements is proof of that claim. Iron is
element number 26 and stable to both fusion and fission and bismuth at
83 is the last stable element. So that if we take 67% or 33% of 83 we
get approximately 27.

So, the neutron as the particle of the Smallest amount of Fusion in
the entire Universe would have to obey the Fusion Barrier Principle if
correct. And it does so.

The particle of the greatest amount of fusion capacity is the Muon and
it allows 67% breakeven. If there was a greater fusing-particle than
the Muon it would be the Tauon or Tau-electron. But it is unable to
create fusion. The nonexistance of the Tauon as a fusor-particle is
proof in and of itself that the Fusion Barrier Principle exists and is
true.

If ITER is ever built, it will flop. If a tauon can fuse hydrogen
atoms and exceed 67% breakeven, then ITER can be a success. But the
Tauon is a fusor flop and thus ITER will be a flop also.

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Hello,
Is this what you are talking about?

www.santillimagnegas.com

Read Section on New Energy Research
http://blazelabs.com/index.htm

Do these links and offeringa fit your questions?

(Archimedes Plutonium) wrote in message . com...
In a sense the neutron is a fusion-particle in that it fuses together
the nuclei
of several protons, which without neutrons would fly apart.

The muon is another fusion particle. And the muon goes right up
against and approaches the Fusion Barrier Principle of 67% breakeven.
In fact the muon in experiments (Nagamine in England) has reached 67%
breakeven but impossible to improve that performance.

So, the neutron offers us another course of experiments to perform,
and a parallel course to collaborate of the muon 67% achievement. If
FBP is correct then the neutron ability to fuse or hold together
protons should also not exceed 67% breakeven. And, in effect, the
Periodic Chart of Chemical Elements is proof of that claim. Iron is
element number 26 and stable to both fusion and fission and bismuth at
83 is the last stable element. So that if we take 67% or 33% of 83 we
get approximately 27.

So, the neutron as the particle of the Smallest amount of Fusion in
the entire Universe would have to obey the Fusion Barrier Principle if
correct. And it does so.

The particle of the greatest amount of fusion capacity is the Muon and
it allows 67% breakeven. If there was a greater fusing-particle than
the Muon it would be the Tauon or Tau-electron. But it is unable to
create fusion. The nonexistance of the Tauon as a fusor-particle is
proof in and of itself that the Fusion Barrier Principle exists and is
true.

If ITER is ever built, it will flop. If a tauon can fuse hydrogen
atoms and exceed 67% breakeven, then ITER can be a success. But the
Tauon is a fusor flop and thus ITER will be a flop also.


I like the above missive because today I can summarize broadly. Not
only fusion in a Tokamak but fusion in building all the chemical
elements from hydrogen up to the heavy isotopes and where the FBP,
Fusion Barrier Principle, comes into play.

Soon it will approach a decade that this planet has had the FBP,
discovered in 1997.

And it has been fun for me to see how various facts have come
together.

The world really has 2 fusion Particles. I like to call them
Fusion-Particles
and perhaps in the future a better word will arise. Those 2 are the
neutron and
the muon.

The world has known of the Experimental Barrier to fusion is 67%
breakeven
achieved by Nagamine in England working with muon catalyzed fusion.
JET before
it was ended achieved 64% breakeven.

I assumed the FBP would be 67% breakeven just from the muon experiment
alone.

But I applied a Scientific Theoretical Proof to the experimental data
of 67%.
Because in Mathematics there is a theorem that enclosed sphere in
cylinder and vice versa has a maximum of 67% per volume and per area
and the sphere and cylinder in mathematics becomes the Maxwell
Equations in physics. Gauss's Law
is a sphere and Faraday's Law is a cylinder, as well as the other
Maxwell Eq.
Thus, the maximum energy in Fusion Technology will be 67% breakeven
and never
higher.

What is the muon compared to the neutron? Simple. The neutron when it
enters into the nuclear region becomes a proton and a
*nuclear-electron*. This is the glue that is the StrongNuclear force
is that the electron inside every neutron spills out and runs around
the nucleus holding together the protons. The muon is also a more
energetic electron.

So the glue that is the neutron and the muon is merely a hyper
energetic electron.

The Periodic Chart of Chemical Elements is like looking at 100 or 114
different cases of fusion. Like 100 different tiny tokamaks where the
helium atom is a different tokamak from a lithium atom and the glue
for all these tokamaks is the neutron.

So if Nagamine reached 67% breakeven but never able to go beyond 67%
then this 67% should appear also in the Periodic Chart of Chemical
Elements. And it does so very nicely. Because bismuth at atomic number
83 is the last stable isotope and iron at atomic number 26 is stable
to both fusion and fission in that 33% and 67%
is approx the value of 26 to 83.

So the Muon and Neutron are the only Fusion-Particles in the world.

Now, if the Tauon, the tau-electron, was a fusion particle then we
could have fusion events beyond 67% breakeven and we could build a
machine such as ITER that could exceed 67% breakeven and that Nagamine
could discover a new way of boosting his muons to go beyond 67%
breakeven.

But alas, the Tauon is unable to fuse. The tauon is not a fusion
particle.

Only the neutron and muon are fusion-particles and because that is
true means fusion has an upper limit of 67% breakeven.

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

(Bob Brown) wrote in message om...
Hello,
Is this what you are talking about?

www.santillimagnegas.com

Read Section on New Energy Research
http://blazelabs.com/index.htm

Do these links and offeringa fit your questions?


Wow, thanks for posting these links. They're pseudoscientific scams
taken to the very extreme! Pity anyone so stupid as to invest.

Harry C.