|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: wrong |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
July 13th 03
posted to sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
It's all wrong.
John Schoenfeld: crackpot
Your reasons for this assertion are irrelevent and fail to explain the mechanics behind point mass collisions. Point masses don't exist except as idealizations. Along with idealizing a point mass, you have to take what goes along with the fiction if you expect to get something other than non-sense. You've already proved that when you got complete non-sense by ignoring the physics. Idiot. If you have a continuous space and a mass then that mass is the integral sum of its containing point masses. No, it isn't. It's the integral of a mass density. Are stoned or just stupid? 
|
| Ads |
|
#12
July 14th 03
posted to sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's all wrong.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why its all wrong. | John Schoenfeld | Physics - General Discussion | 13 | July 11th 03 05:25 AM |
Linear Mode
