![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: article, mystery, particle, scientists |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scientists find mystery particle
By Dr David Whitehouse Scientists have found a sub-atomic particle they cannot explain using current theories of energy and matter. The discovery was made by researchers based at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organisation in Tsukuba. Classified as X(3872), the particle was seen fleetingly in an atom smasher and has been dubbed the "mystery meson". The Japanese team says understanding its existence may require a change to the Standard Model, the accepted theory of the way the Universe is constructed. An eternity X(3872) was found among the decay products of so-called beauty mesons - sub-atomic particles that are produced in large numbers at the Tsukuba "meson factory". It weighs about the same as a single atom of helium and exists for only about one billionth of a trillionth of a second before it decays into other longer-lived, more familiar particles. Although this is extremely short-lived by human standards, scientists say that a billionth of a trillionth of a second is nearly an eternity for a sub-atomic particle this heavy. Particles smaller than the atom are grouped into families depending upon their mass, spin and electric charge. But X(3872) is peculiar in that it does not fit easily into any known particle scheme and, as a result, has attracted a considerable amount of attention from the world's physics community. New pairs Its discovery was recently confirmed by researchers at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, US, home of the Tevatron, the world's largest atom smasher. It was the US outfit that gave X(3872) its mystery tag. A normal meson is comprised of a quark and an antiquark held together by the "colour" force, also called the "strong" force because it is the most powerful known in nature. The large variety of meson particles that have been found to date reflect the many different ways that these combinations can be achieved. However, again, X(3872) does not match theoretical expectations for any conceivable quark-antiquark arrangement. To explain it, theoretical physicists may have to modify their theory of the colour force; or make X(3872) the first example of a new type of meson, one that is made from four quarks (two quarks and two antiquarks). From BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3277579.stm Comment: May I suggest a name for the new particle: Nobigbangium? -- Kind Regards, Robert Karl Stonjek. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
Scientists find mystery particle By Dr David Whitehouse Scientists have found a sub-atomic particle they cannot explain using current theories of energy and matter. If one looks at the last sentence of the article, one sees that this claim is wrong. The discovery was made by researchers based at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organisation in Tsukuba. Classified as X(3872), the particle was seen fleetingly in an atom smasher and has been dubbed the "mystery meson". The Japanese team says understanding its existence may require a change to the Standard Model, the accepted theory of the way the Universe is constructed. "may". Look at the last sentence: there is an easy explanation. An eternity X(3872) was found among the decay products of so-called beauty mesons - sub-atomic particles that are produced in large numbers at the Tsukuba "meson factory". It weighs about the same as a single atom of helium and exists for only about one billionth of a trillionth of a second before it decays into other longer-lived, more familiar particles. Although this is extremely short-lived by human standards, scientists say that a billionth of a trillionth of a second is nearly an eternity for a sub-atomic particle this heavy. Particles smaller than the atom are grouped into families depending upon their mass, spin and electric charge. But X(3872) is peculiar in that it does not fit easily into any known particle scheme Note: "not easily" does not mean "not at all". and, as a result, has attracted a considerable amount of attention from the world's physics community. New pairs Its discovery was recently confirmed by researchers at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, US, home of the Tevatron, the world's largest atom smasher. It was the US outfit that gave X(3872) its mystery tag. A normal meson is comprised of a quark and an antiquark held together by the "colour" force, also called the "strong" force because it is the most powerful known in nature. The large variety of meson particles that have been found to date reflect the many different ways that these combinations can be achieved. However, again, X(3872) does not match theoretical expectations for any conceivable quark-antiquark arrangement. Well, as pointed out below, there are other combinations possible than only quark-antiquark pairs. To explain it, theoretical physicists may have to modify their theory of the colour force; or make X(3872) the first example of a new type of meson, one that is made from four quarks (two quarks and two antiquarks). See? A nice explanation which violated nothing in the Standard Model. Or is there anything in the SM which says that mesons consisting of two quarks and two antiquarks can't exist? That would be news to me. From BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3277579.stm Comment: May I suggest a name for the new particle: Nobigbangium? Why? What on earth has this to do with the Big Bang? Bye, Bjoern |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SCIENTISTS FIND MYSTERY PARTICLE | Dr. Jai Maharaj | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | November 18th 03 08:06 PM |
| Mathematicians are not scientists | James Harris | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | November 11th 03 02:10 AM |
| Scientists don't get laid... | AF | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | October 25th 03 08:31 AM |
| Find the work done by the force field F(x,y) = x sin j + yj on particle that moves along the parabola y = x² from (-1,1) to (2,4). | JVMA | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 18th 03 12:02 AM |
| Article] Experts find fault with US plan to intercept missiles at source | Robert Karl Stonjek | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 17th 03 12:34 AM |