A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Article] Scientists find mystery particle



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 18th 03 posted to sci.physics
Robert Karl Stonjek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 894
Default Article] Scientists find mystery particle

Scientists find mystery particle

By Dr David Whitehouse

Scientists have found a sub-atomic particle they cannot explain using
current theories of energy and matter.
The discovery was made by researchers based at the High Energy
Accelerator Research Organisation in Tsukuba.

Classified as X(3872), the particle was seen fleetingly in an atom
smasher and has been dubbed the "mystery meson".

The Japanese team says understanding its existence may require a change
to the Standard Model, the accepted theory of the way the Universe is
constructed.

An eternity

X(3872) was found among the decay products of so-called beauty mesons -
sub-atomic particles that are produced in large numbers at the Tsukuba
"meson factory".

It weighs about the same as a single atom of helium and exists for only
about one billionth of a trillionth of a second before it decays into
other longer-lived, more familiar particles.

Although this is extremely short-lived by human standards, scientists
say that a billionth of a trillionth of a second is nearly an eternity
for a sub-atomic particle this heavy.

Particles smaller than the atom are grouped into families depending upon
their mass, spin and electric charge.

But X(3872) is peculiar in that it does not fit easily into any known
particle scheme and, as a result, has attracted a considerable amount of
attention from the world's physics community.

New pairs

Its discovery was recently confirmed by researchers at the Fermi
National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, US, home of the Tevatron,
the world's largest atom smasher. It was the US outfit that gave X(3872)
its mystery tag.

A normal meson is comprised of a quark and an antiquark held together by
the "colour" force, also called the "strong" force because it is the
most powerful known in nature.

The large variety of meson particles that have been found to date
reflect the many different ways that these combinations can be achieved.

However, again, X(3872) does not match theoretical expectations for any
conceivable quark-antiquark arrangement.

To explain it, theoretical physicists may have to modify their theory of
the colour force; or make X(3872) the first example of a new type of
meson, one that is made from four quarks (two quarks and two
antiquarks).

From BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3277579.stm

Comment:
May I suggest a name for the new particle: Nobigbangium?

--
Kind Regards,
Robert Karl Stonjek.


Ads
  #2  
Old November 19th 03 posted to sci.physics
Bjoern Feuerbacher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,532
Default Article] Scientists find mystery particle

Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:

Scientists find mystery particle

By Dr David Whitehouse

Scientists have found a sub-atomic particle they cannot explain using
current theories of energy and matter.


If one looks at the last sentence of the article, one sees that this
claim is wrong.


The discovery was made by researchers based at the High Energy
Accelerator Research Organisation in Tsukuba.

Classified as X(3872), the particle was seen fleetingly in an atom
smasher and has been dubbed the "mystery meson".

The Japanese team says understanding its existence may require a change
to the Standard Model, the accepted theory of the way the Universe is
constructed.


"may". Look at the last sentence: there is an easy explanation.


An eternity

X(3872) was found among the decay products of so-called beauty mesons -
sub-atomic particles that are produced in large numbers at the Tsukuba
"meson factory".

It weighs about the same as a single atom of helium and exists for only
about one billionth of a trillionth of a second before it decays into
other longer-lived, more familiar particles.

Although this is extremely short-lived by human standards, scientists
say that a billionth of a trillionth of a second is nearly an eternity
for a sub-atomic particle this heavy.

Particles smaller than the atom are grouped into families depending upon
their mass, spin and electric charge.

But X(3872) is peculiar in that it does not fit easily into any known
particle scheme


Note: "not easily" does not mean "not at all".


and, as a result, has attracted a considerable amount of
attention from the world's physics community.

New pairs

Its discovery was recently confirmed by researchers at the Fermi
National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, US, home of the Tevatron,
the world's largest atom smasher. It was the US outfit that gave X(3872)
its mystery tag.

A normal meson is comprised of a quark and an antiquark held together by
the "colour" force, also called the "strong" force because it is the
most powerful known in nature.

The large variety of meson particles that have been found to date
reflect the many different ways that these combinations can be achieved.

However, again, X(3872) does not match theoretical expectations for any
conceivable quark-antiquark arrangement.


Well, as pointed out below, there are other combinations possible than
only quark-antiquark pairs.


To explain it, theoretical physicists may have to modify their theory of
the colour force; or make X(3872) the first example of a new type of
meson, one that is made from four quarks (two quarks and two
antiquarks).


See? A nice explanation which violated nothing in the Standard Model. Or
is there anything in the SM which says that mesons consisting of two
quarks and two antiquarks can't exist? That would be news to me.


From BBC News
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3277579.stm

Comment:
May I suggest a name for the new particle: Nobigbangium?


Why? What on earth has this to do with the Big Bang?


Bye,
Bjoern
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SCIENTISTS FIND MYSTERY PARTICLE Dr. Jai Maharaj Physics - General Discussion 1 November 18th 03 08:06 PM
Mathematicians are not scientists James Harris Physics - General Discussion 5 November 11th 03 02:10 AM
Scientists don't get laid... AF Physics - General Discussion 6 October 25th 03 08:31 AM
Find the work done by the force field F(x,y) = x sin j + yj on particle that moves along the parabola y = x² from (-1,1) to (2,4). JVMA Physics - General Discussion 0 August 18th 03 12:02 AM
Article] Experts find fault with US plan to intercept missiles at source Robert Karl Stonjek Physics - General Discussion 0 July 17th 03 12:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Loan - Mobile Phone - Vanzari Auto - Cell Phones