![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: bridges, ladders, space |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not build a ladder to space? Impossible you think? Not so at all.
Build a space station to orbit in the closest distance from the earth as possible (Just above gravitational pull), directly over some designated point on earth. From this space station, start building a long cable of say titanium, such that is starts to drop down toward earth. Build a robot which travels from the space station along the cable, simply extending the cable as it goes down to earth. In order get enough titanium up to the robot, send cargo shuttles or rockets with loads of liquid titanium, up to dock with the robot, transfer the titanium and also new power supply, and then return to earth. The robot satellite will be suspended along the cable it is building, and finally build it down to earth. Then shuttle cars can be fitted to the cable, and winched from the space station, right into space. From this intermediate space station, more bridges can be built between higher orbiting space stations if needed. This will be a cheap and easy way for humans to travel into space! |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
DF wrote:
Why not build a ladder to space? Impossible you think? Not so at all. Build a space station to orbit in the closest distance from the earth as possible (Just above gravitational pull), directly over some designated point on earth. o The gravitational force expends to infinity o orbital velocity is a function of radius, but does not act like a solid wheel. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Orbit.html o Newton's laws apply |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear DF:
"DF" wrote in message om... Arthur C. Clarke beat you to this idea. Why not build a ladder to space? Impossible you think? Not so at all. Build a space station to orbit in the closest distance from the earth as possible (Just above gravitational pull), Gravitation extends the breadth of the Universe. directly over some designated point on earth. From this space station, start building a long cable of say titanium, such that is starts to drop down toward earth. Titianium is too weak for the weight. There is some hope that carbon nanotubes can do this. Build a robot which travels from the space station along the cable, simply extending the cable as it goes down to earth. In order get enough titanium up to the robot, send cargo shuttles or rockets with loads of liquid titanium, up to dock with the robot, transfer the titanium and also new power supply, and then return to earth. Mr. Clarke played out a very thin tether from a space shuttle, then used the tether to haul up the heavy stuff. The robot satellite will be suspended along the cable it is building, and finally build it down to earth. Then shuttle cars can be fitted to the cable, and winched from the space station, right into space. From this intermediate space station, more bridges can be built between higher orbiting space stations if needed. This will be a cheap and easy way for humans to travel into space! Not so easy. The cabling is the problem. It also will be a target for terrorists. And lightning, and storms... David A. Smith |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"DF" wrote in message
om... Why not build a ladder to space? Impossible you think? Not so at all. Build a space station to orbit in the closest distance from the earth as possible (Just above gravitational pull), directly over some designated point on earth. From this space station, start building a long cable of say titanium, such that is starts to drop down toward earth. If the station was "above gravitational pull" (it's already been pointed out that it can't be), it wouldn't orbit the earth at all. Ignoring that, the designated point would have to be directly above the equator and ~36000 km up (geostationary). To give you an idea of what that means, the earth's radius is ~6000 km. No material we currently have can support it's own weight at these kinds of sizes - I know 'cos this kind of thing crops up in science rags on quiet weeks, with details of why we can't do it. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
DF wrote:
Why not build a ladder to space? Impossible you think? Not so at all. Build a space station to orbit in the closest distance from the earth as possible (Just above gravitational pull), Idiot alert!!! Gravitation has infinite range. What do you think keeps the Earth in its orbit, git? directly over some designated point on earth. From this space station, start building a long cable of say titanium, such that is starts to drop down toward earth. IDIOT ALERT! "The Fountains of Paradise," Arthur C. Clarke. The author has an adequate overall analysis of the problem except for three small suspensions of disbelief in engineering details and one in biology: 1) The tensile strength of diamond, 10 tonnes/mm^2, is not quite sufficent to pull it off even with an optimally tapered straight line beanstalk, and 2) The minmum energy curve of a beanstalk is not a straight line, not nearly. Exploring construction of a bleeding edge material technology 22,280 mile-long pillar is truly awful economically. A California freeway on flat land costs about $5-20 million/mile - and it is only poured concrete. ($10 million/mile)(22,280 miles) = $220 billion Now, add the NASA markup - $50,000/kg to low Earth orbit mass. Cheap 2000 psi concrete in retail bulk costs about $16/cu.yd. With the NASA markup that comes to $120 million/cu.yd. 3) You also have the naughtiness of the Earth's magnetosphere billowing in the solar wind and severely writhing during solar storms. Any extended electrical conductor will, through Lens' law, go absolutely ape. 4) The inner Van Allen radiation belt extends over altitudes from 12400 to 3100 miles in altitude and contains energetic protons. The outer Van Allen radiation belt is 3700 miles thick centered at 9900 miles in altitude. It contains energetic electrons. Your beanstalk will be cooked to char by radiation, as will any passengers traveling along it. (5) Social issues. If you actually do build it, Islam will tear it down. The Church of Rome during the Inqusition was infinitly tolerant and Liberal compared to Wahabi Islam (all of Saudi Arabia, for a start). Islam will not tolerate anything better than you squatting in your own feces. (Certain exceptions are *temporarily* levied for wealthy donors.) Rewards are in the next life. [snip ignorant bull****] -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm (Do something naughty to physics) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re : A question about space | Alfred Einstead | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | November 5th 03 11:12 PM |
| Cheap way to space | habshi | Physics - General Discussion | 23 | September 25th 03 10:07 PM |
| ESE/LSE truth or consequences, as space elevators tend to run amuck, the lunar space elevator isn't | Brad Guth | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | September 25th 03 06:08 PM |
| All there is is space. | Richard | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | September 17th 03 09:41 AM |
| A question about space | Dennis | Physics - General Discussion | 66 | August 21st 03 01:57 AM |