![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 2003, apollo, faq, hoax, moon, november, v41 |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Nathan Jones" wrote in message ... Nancy is that you? -- -Randy (OF+) 'Up the stairs. Into the fire.' |
| Ads |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Typinski" wrote in message ... The Ghost In The Machine wrote: In sci.physics, Nathan Jones THE APOLLO HOAX FAQ version 4.1 - November 2003 Written by Nathan Jones The gadgetry we left up there, the Moon rocks here, and all the recorded mission telemetry and communication does, however, make it extremely unlikely that the Apollo Moon missions were faked. It would've cost way more and would've been much more difficult to fake everything than it did and was to just plain send some guys up there. I have always wondered that, If this were true, in this day and age of Media hype and flash in the pan stories, how did they get 100,000 or so people to Shut the Hell up about it for the past 30 years.... I didn't notice a sudden spike in the mortality rate of the tech sector..... |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Edward Green responded to The Hansen FAQ:
Does anyone else get the idea that most of the questions in these sorts of FAQs have really never been asked at all? Perhaps you speak of science FAQ's. But I came across an interesting hole in the FAQ of a cut-rate ISP. Do you provide space on a web server as a service? One can only answer this, in the negative, by an exhaustive search on their pages which fails to turn up any info. I guess theirs was a "FAQWAWL" (frequently asked questions whose answers we like). Questions whose answers we don't like aren't "questions". Do they have giraffes available for rent? Do they give a new car to each customer switching from another ISP? Do I have a clean pair of sox I can wear tomorrow? -- Jeff, frequently asking questions in Minneapolis .. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
In sci.physics, Dave Typinski
wrote on Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:19:11 -0500 : The Ghost In The Machine wrote: In sci.physics, Nathan Jones THE APOLLO HOAX FAQ version 4.1 - November 2003 Written by Nathan Jones [rest snipped] Beyond the fact we dragged back 382 kg of moon rock, snip [etc.], there's no proof that we went to the moon. Unfortunately, conspiracy theorists' minds are hermetically sealed. And they've lost the key. The gadgetry we left up there doesn't prove anything. Everything that was left behind - from corner cubes, to LM descent stages, to EVA suits, to bags of frozen urine They bagged it? My brain hurts...though I suppose that's a little easier to design than ejecting it out of a heated orifice on the side of the LEM. (Of course nowadays we'd be expected to bring it *back*; the EPA gets more stringent every year...) - *could* have been placed there by robotic missions. Could've even had EVA suit boots on a rover that bounced aroud to make the footprints. Yeah, I've always wanted to bag some urine and send it to the Moon. For, erm, scientific purposes. Yeah, that's it. Not to mention a robotic rover which would probably look like something Acme Whizzbang Gadgets (dedicated to instantly sending things to coyotes way out in the middle of nowhere via helicopter or postal truck) would dream up -- and work about as well; wheels just make much more sense on a relatively flat surface. And if they're going to go to all that trouble, why go all the way to the Moon? They could just as easily go to Sound Stage 3 on a movie lot somewhere, throw around some gray dust, paint a matte or two, and implant a boot in cement. Voila. (Of course they'd then have to burn the place down or something to destroy the evidence afterwards. After all, what good would a conspiracy theory be with actual evidence to back it up?) The gadgetry we left up there, the Moon rocks here, and all the recorded mission telemetry and communication does, however, make it extremely unlikely that the Apollo Moon missions were faked. It would've cost way more and would've been much more difficult to fake everything than it did and was to just plain send some guys up there. Not sure about it costing more but it certainly would be way more pointless. :-) -- Dave Typinski http://home.alltel.net/trapezium -- #191, It's still legal to go .sigless. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Jay Windley
writes "Nathan Jones" wrote in message ... Judging by the number of times he's posted this, he's not just trolling but spamming. Ignore him. -- Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10 Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Physics News Update -- Number 660, November 4, 2003 | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | November 6th 03 07:05 PM |
| The Apollo Hoax FAQ | Nathan Jones | Physics - General Discussion | 12 | November 6th 03 05:58 AM |
| October November 2003 | Michael McNeil | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 3rd 03 10:31 AM |
| PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 656 October 7, 2003 (THE 2003 PHYSICSNOBEL PRIZE) | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | October 7th 03 05:33 PM |
| Undeniable Zeno Hoax Hoax | Ed Keane III | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | August 19th 03 08:37 PM |