A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

Geometrical Polar-Ring Solution for Magic and Sub-Magic Numbered



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 31st 03 posted to sci.physics
Leo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Geometrical Polar-Ring Solution for Magic and Sub-Magic Numbered

Geometrical Polar-Ring Solution for Magic and Sub-Magic Numbered
Nuclei.

It is well known that if the neutron- or proton number within atomic
nuclei have the following quantities (2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82 and 126:
the magic numbers), then the atoms are showing a more than average
stability. As an example, the most stable form of Lead PB126 is an
integration of two T= 82 and T=126 (Double Magic) structures. (figure
B)see:
http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Vuyk.htm#appendix7
The common "Shell Model" doesn't give a logically 3D representation
of these nucleons.

As a solution: Each magic numbered nucleon is supposed to have a
polar axis which is
occupied by an even number of nucleons.
This axis is the centre of the coaxial placed symmetrical and
globular system of circular trajectories or rings.
The planes of the rings are supposed to be concentric and
perpendicular to the polar axis.
Each circular trajectory is occupied by even numbers of nucleons, as
represented in the figures below.
These figures have to be interpreted as central sections over the
axis of the globular nucleus.
The magic number nuclei with 82 and 126 nucleons have a
second "concentric inner system" of nucleons.
Number T=82 has only one inner ring with 6 nucleons, and number T=126
has three inner rings with respectively 6,8, and 6 nucleons.

Based on this growing system we may construct and suggest the next
magic numbers= 178 and 244.
It would be interesting to study on the intermediate
transitional "jump" situations in nature, between these structures.
See the figure B:
There are 7 magic numbered ATOM NUCLEI systematically represented, as
a central section through the axis of the more or less globular
nucleus, starting with nucleon number: T=2, and in succession T=8,
20.28.50,82 and 126.
The dot sign represents an axial located nucleon.

There are two types of circular located nucleons:

Type A: outer ring located Nucleons: represented in figure B as a
closed rectangular with a number X enclosed. This represents a
circular trajectory (ring) occupied by X nucleons, concentric with he
polar axis of the nucleon.

Type B: so called Inner ring located Nucleons: represented in figure
B as a closed rectangular with an internal horizontal striping and an
external located number Y. This represents a circular trajectory
occupied by Y nucleons, concentric with the polar axis of the nucleon.
For T=2, there are 2 axial nucleons.
For T=8, There are 2 axial nucleons, and 6 ring nucleons= 8. Or, as
an alternative: 4 axial nucleons, and 4 ring nucleons=8 nucleons.
For T=20, There are 6 axial nucleons, and 14: (4+6+4) ring nucleons=
20 nucleons. Or, as an alternative : 4 axial nucleons and 2x8 ring
nucleons.
For T=28, there are 8 axial nucleons, and 20: (6+8+6) ring
nucleons=28 nucleons.
For T=50, there are 12 axial nucleons, and 386+8+10+8+6) ring
nucleons.
For T=82, there are 16 axial nucleons, and 66: (6+8+10+12+10+8+6)+
(6:in the inner ring) ring nucleons=82 nucleons.
For T=126, There are 20 axial nucleons, and 106:
(6+8+10+12+14+12+10+8+6)+(6+8+6: in the inner ring)=126 nucleons.

As a result: we may assume that all nucleons should have more or
less the same combined structure of Axial and Concentric Ring
located Nucleons, as the origin of atomic up or down polarity.

So called submagic nuclei, are nuclei which show also a more than
average stability, but less manifest than the magic numbered nuclei.
The numbers found by experiments seem to be: 14,
38,40,64,108,114,120,152, and 162. If we look at the 7 magic numbered
nucleons (see also figure B
http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Vuyk.htm#appendix8 ), it is
obvious that it represents 7 special Polar/Ring shaped moments within
a growing nuclear scheme. As a consequence, there should be
intermediate geometrical structures possible between the seven
different cross sections given in the figure B, with equatorial
symmetry and more or less deformed globular structures.

For T=14, it is assumed that there are 6 axial nucleons and 8 ring
nucleons.

For T=38, there are 10 axial nucleons and 28 (6+8+8+6) ring
nucleons.

For T=40, there are 12 axial nucleons, and 28 (6+8+8+6) ring
nucleons.

For T= 64, there are 16 axial nucleons and 48 (6+8+10+10+8+6) ring
nucleons.

For T=108, there are 18 axial nucleons and 90 (6+8+10+12+12+10+8+6) +
(6+6+6: in the inner ring).

T=114, is assumed to be basically identical with T=126, however
with subtraction of the two inner rings occupied with each 6
nucleons.

T=120, is assumed to be also corresponding with T=126, however with
extension of 2 extra axial nucleons (22 total) and with subtraction
of the single inner ring occupied with 8 nucleons.

T=152, is assumed to be also corresponding with T=126, however with
extension of 4 extra axial nucleons (24 total) and with addition of
an extra "double equatorial ring " (8+14=22 nucleons) adding 26 extra
nucleons to the T=126 nucleus.

T=162, is assumed to be corresponding with T=126, however with
extension of 4 extra axial nucleons (24 total) and with addition of
2x double equatorial rings (8+14+14+8=44 nucleons) and under
subtraction of two inner rings of 6 nucleons. As a result this
nucleus should have a cylindrical non-globular form elongated along
the nuclear axis.

(see; Figure B.
http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Vuyk.htm#appendix8 .The schematic
geometrical representation of these nucleons placed in magic number
nuclei)
Leo.
http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/
Ads
  #2  
Old November 3rd 03 posted to sci.physics
Leo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Geometrical Polar-Ring Solution for Magic and Sub-Magic Numbered

So as an interesting feature, this geometric solution is able to
explain not only the series of Magic numbers: 2,8,20,28,50,82,126, but
also SUB MAGIC NUMBERS:
14,38,40,64,108,114,120,152, and 162.

(Leo) wrote in message . com...
Geometrical Polar-Ring Solution for Magic and Sub-Magic Numbered
Nuclei.

It is well known that if the neutron- or proton number within atomic
nuclei have the following quantities (2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82 and 126:
the magic numbers), then the atoms are showing a more than average
stability. As an example, the most stable form of Lead PB126 is an
integration of two T= 82 and T=126 (Double Magic) structures. (figure
B)see:
http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Vuyk.htm#appendix7
The common "Shell Model" doesn't give a logically 3D representation
of these nucleons.

As a solution: Each magic numbered nucleon is supposed to have a
polar axis which is
occupied by an even number of nucleons.
This axis is the centre of the coaxial placed symmetrical and
globular system of circular trajectories or rings.
The planes of the rings are supposed to be concentric and
perpendicular to the polar axis.
Each circular trajectory is occupied by even numbers of nucleons, as
represented in the figures below.
These figures have to be interpreted as central sections over the
axis of the globular nucleus.
The magic number nuclei with 82 and 126 nucleons have a
second "concentric inner system" of nucleons.
Number T=82 has only one inner ring with 6 nucleons, and number T=126
has three inner rings with respectively 6,8, and 6 nucleons.

Based on this growing system we may construct and suggest the next
magic numbers= 178 and 244.
It would be interesting to study on the intermediate
transitional "jump" situations in nature, between these structures.
See the figure B:
There are 7 magic numbered ATOM NUCLEI systematically represented, as
a central section through the axis of the more or less globular
nucleus, starting with nucleon number: T=2, and in succession T=8,
20.28.50,82 and 126.
The dot sign represents an axial located nucleon.

There are two types of circular located nucleons:

Type A: outer ring located Nucleons: represented in figure B as a
closed rectangular with a number X enclosed. This represents a
circular trajectory (ring) occupied by X nucleons, concentric with he
polar axis of the nucleon.

Type B: so called Inner ring located Nucleons: represented in figure
B as a closed rectangular with an internal horizontal striping and an
external located number Y. This represents a circular trajectory
occupied by Y nucleons, concentric with the polar axis of the nucleon.
For T=2, there are 2 axial nucleons.
For T=8, There are 2 axial nucleons, and 6 ring nucleons= 8. Or, as
an alternative: 4 axial nucleons, and 4 ring nucleons=8 nucleons.
For T=20, There are 6 axial nucleons, and 14: (4+6+4) ring nucleons=
20 nucleons. Or, as an alternative : 4 axial nucleons and 2x8 ring
nucleons.
For T=28, there are 8 axial nucleons, and 20: (6+8+6) ring
nucleons=28 nucleons.
For T=50, there are 12 axial nucleons, and 386+8+10+8+6) ring
nucleons.
For T=82, there are 16 axial nucleons, and 66: (6+8+10+12+10+8+6)+
(6:in the inner ring) ring nucleons=82 nucleons.
For T=126, There are 20 axial nucleons, and 106:
(6+8+10+12+14+12+10+8+6)+(6+8+6: in the inner ring)=126 nucleons.

As a result: we may assume that all nucleons should have more or
less the same combined structure of Axial and Concentric Ring
located Nucleons, as the origin of atomic up or down polarity.

So called submagic nuclei, are nuclei which show also a more than
average stability, but less manifest than the magic numbered nuclei.
The numbers found by experiments seem to be: 14,
38,40,64,108,114,120,152, and 162. If we look at the 7 magic numbered
nucleons (see also figure B
http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Vuyk.htm#appendix8 ), it is
obvious that it represents 7 special Polar/Ring shaped moments within
a growing nuclear scheme. As a consequence, there should be
intermediate geometrical structures possible between the seven
different cross sections given in the figure B, with equatorial
symmetry and more or less deformed globular structures.

For T=14, it is assumed that there are 6 axial nucleons and 8 ring
nucleons.

For T=38, there are 10 axial nucleons and 28 (6+8+8+6) ring
nucleons.

For T=40, there are 12 axial nucleons, and 28 (6+8+8+6) ring
nucleons.

For T= 64, there are 16 axial nucleons and 48 (6+8+10+10+8+6) ring
nucleons.

For T=108, there are 18 axial nucleons and 90 (6+8+10+12+12+10+8+6) +
(6+6+6: in the inner ring).

T=114, is assumed to be basically identical with T=126, however
with subtraction of the two inner rings occupied with each 6
nucleons.

T=120, is assumed to be also corresponding with T=126, however with
extension of 2 extra axial nucleons (22 total) and with subtraction
of the single inner ring occupied with 8 nucleons.

T=152, is assumed to be also corresponding with T=126, however with
extension of 4 extra axial nucleons (24 total) and with addition of
an extra "double equatorial ring " (8+14=22 nucleons) adding 26 extra
nucleons to the T=126 nucleus.

T=162, is assumed to be corresponding with T=126, however with
extension of 4 extra axial nucleons (24 total) and with addition of
2x double equatorial rings (8+14+14+8=44 nucleons) and under
subtraction of two inner rings of 6 nucleons. As a result this
nucleus should have a cylindrical non-globular form elongated along
the nuclear axis.

(see; Figure B.
http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Vuyk.htm#appendix8 .The schematic
geometrical representation of these nucleons placed in magic number
nuclei)
Leo.
http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Movie Magic Physics?? LordObento Physics - General Discussion 8 October 24th 03 07:01 AM
The Smart Model Salvation Solution vs. The Bible Salvation Solution S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 October 14th 03 09:51 AM
Articles] Astronomers turn to MAGIC Robert Karl Stonjek Physics - General Discussion 0 October 13th 03 11:11 PM
OT: A Magic Knight's Tour Sam Wormley Physics - General Discussion 0 October 4th 03 03:05 PM
You can clearly see the oxygen ring structures - Smart1234 S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 1 August 2nd 03 01:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Cards - Loans - Mortgages - Loans - Credit Cards UK