![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: lifter, look, theory, tools, website |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear All!
I finaly addressed justified concerns voiced recently by several readers, that my Lifter Theory web-site http://members.tripod.com/~sudy_zhenja/lifter_theory is too difficult to navigate for non Ph.D.-s. Such concerns obviously were a call to action for me, as that is the one and only site where Ion Drift theory of Lifter propulsion (which many have first mistaken with antigravity) was first proposed and proved, equations are derived, relationships explored and new designs are proposed. While theory has been since mirrored at lots of other sites, original documents still are most updated and most cross-linked with new confirmations and derived developments. Considering education of beginners is just as important as serving to seasoned Lifter-pros and physic-gurus, I completely redisigned the web-site, clearly separating parts where basic explanation of effect is given (extending them with pictures, diagrams and links). All previous links are preserved, so don't worry about updating your sites referencing my materials. Lifter FAQ is now separated as special page, which makes it easy to find. There is no longer any need to collect all equations from many separate articles. They are all now summarized in on place called Lifter Toolbox, which also offers mathcad file for Life Calculations for your particular configuration (link to free MathCad viewer is given). To make it short - visit the site and see it for yourself: http://members.tripod.com/~sudy_zhenja/lifter_theory Regards, Evgenij -- __________________________________________________ *science&fiction*free programs*fine art*phylosophy: http://sudy_zhenja.tripod.com ----------remove hate_spam to answer-------------- |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Evgenij Barsukov wrote:
Dear All! I finaly addressed justified concerns voiced recently by several readers, that my Lifter Theory web-site http://members.tripod.com/~sudy_zhenja/lifter_theory is too difficult to navigate for non Ph.D.-s. It isn't difficult to navigate, it's bull****. 1) No lifter works in vacuum. 2) No lifter can lift a sealed membrane/balloon in which it is encased, even if the balloon is inflated to neutral boyancy with a mix of lighter-than-air inert gas. 3) No propulsive modality of any kind is worth its weight in cow **** if it scales as surface area. Payload scales as volume. [snip] -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Uncle Al wrote:
Evgenij Barsukov wrote: Dear All! I finaly addressed justified concerns voiced recently by several readers, that my Lifter Theory web-site http://members.tripod.com/~sudy_zhenja/lifter_theory is too difficult to navigate for non Ph.D.-s. It isn't difficult to navigate, it's bull****. 1) No lifter works in vacuum. 2) No lifter can lift a sealed membrane/balloon in which it is encased, even if the balloon is inflated to neutral boyancy with a mix of lighter-than-air inert gas. 3) No propulsive modality of any kind is worth its weight in cow **** if it scales as surface area. Payload scales as volume. Your rage have clouded your eies. Points 1 and 2 is exactly what my web-site is saying (but brings a well documented proof). I think prefer to educate the amators with arguments and derivations based on valid physics to just yelling at them. That has additional advantage of introducing to some not highly educated, yet highly motivated Lifter enthusiasts parts of physic which they might have never learn about otherwise. Point 3) - where did you get that ionic propulsion scales as surface area? It actually scales as volume, as force F=i*d/k, i is proportional to the emmiter surface, d is distance between emmiter and collector, so F is proportional to volume... Conventionaly Lifter-builders used single wire/collector, so the volume effect is not obvious. But for any large design an array of parallel corona-wires would be used, which would be in electrical sense close to a plate-emmiter. Collector can be a mesh perpendicular to the collector-corona axis. Regards. Evgenij -- __________________________________________________ *science&fiction*free programs*fine art*phylosophy: http://sudy_zhenja.tripod.com ----------remove hate_spam to answer-------------- |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Googling My Web Site . | Jeff Relf | Physics - General Discussion | 79 | September 17th 03 01:02 AM |
| Peer2 is just like the Web only different... | Rick Sobie | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | August 25th 03 02:22 PM |
| Guess who rates third on the "Morons of The Web list in sci.physics ? | George | Physics - General Discussion | 15 | July 23rd 03 03:39 PM |
| math site | Jon | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | July 13th 03 05:36 AM |
| The crankiest FTL site..................................................................................................................................................................... | The Ghost In The Machine | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | June 24th 03 07:03 PM |