A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
ralph sansbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity

See www.bestweb.net/~sansbury/book03.htm


Ads
  #2  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,289
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity

ralph sansbury wrote:

See

[snip]

http://www.crank.net/

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
(Do something naughty to physics)
  #3  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Sam Wormley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,586
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity

See: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ch...ww.cran k.net
  #4  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Ed Keane III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity


"ralph sansbury" wrote in message
...
See www.bestweb.net/~sansbury/book03.htm


____________________________________
INTRODUCTION



This book is about evidence for charge polarization inside electrons and
atomic nuclei. Such polarization can be shown to explain apparent quantum
discontinuities and the apparent spacetime distortions of Relativity.

We start with the two most damaging mistakes in the history of physics
that led to the unnecessary added premises of Quantum Mechanics and Special
and General Relativity.

The first mistake was Roemer's so called measurement of the speed of
light in 1676 and the second was Kaufmann's 1903 measurement of the
apparent increase of the mass of beta electrons as their velocity increased.
The experts of the times in these specific sorts of measurements, in each
case, were ignored. Preference was given to the opinions of a larger number
of scientists whose expertise lay elsewhere
______________________________________

You are one crazy dude Ralph.


  #5  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,289
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity

Ed Keane III wrote:

"ralph sansbury" wrote in message
...
See www.bestweb.net/~sansbury/book03.htm


____________________________________
INTRODUCTION

This book is about evidence for charge polarization inside electrons and
atomic nuclei. Such polarization can be shown to explain apparent quantum
discontinuities and the apparent spacetime distortions of Relativity.

[snip]

Horrible bull**** explicitly contradicted by observation. It is a
mark of the psychotic crank that it cannot be educated with literature
citations.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
  #6  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Robert J. Kolker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,291
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity



ralph sansbury wrote:

See www.bestweb.net/~sansbury/book03.htm


Total Twaddle. Anything the invokes Velikovsky is complete balderdash.

Bob Kolker

  #7  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Robert J. Kolker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,291
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity



Uncle Al wrote:

Horrible bull**** explicitly contradicted by observation. It is a
mark of the psychotic crank that it cannot be educated with literature
citations.


Al, your retorts are measured and quiet. No vitriol. Are you feeling
alright?

Bob Kolker

  #8  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,289
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity

"Robert J. Kolker" wrote:

Uncle Al wrote:

Horrible bull**** explicitly contradicted by observation. It is a
mark of the psychotic crank that it cannot be educated with literature
citations.


Al, your retorts are measured and quiet. No vitriol. Are you feeling
alright?


I'm having a pretty good time here. Thousands of acres about 40 miles
to the northeast are burning with 30-50 foot flames. It makes for
great TV. The sun rose deep crimson this morning, making everything
in the neighborhood look like it was in Hell. Enviro-whiners have
"protected" all the dead brush as a fragile and endangered
environment. Now it's payback time. We're talking hundreds of square
miles of fibrous resinous brush and dry wood piled almost ten feet
deep in some places. It's a firestorm and it's going ape****. All it
needs is 40 mph 5% humidity Santa Ana wind promised for this weekend.
The news is orgasmic with bulletins and special reports.

Threaded throughout the "protected" areas are huge upscale residential
communities where developers successfully bribed pauper rural city
councils to build. $Millions/day are being spent to protect, mostly,
$billions in wooden housing built inside a giant tinder stack.

Everybody will be severely threatened by their Housing Association if
they don't repaint everything dirtied by soot. Fast. Gotta maintain
those property values! It gets better... The heat drives resin into
the ground to form a water barrier. If it is a wet winter there will
be world-class flash floods to utterly destroy the (freshly painted)
houses.

In theory the burned land could be disked to break the seal and and
planted with grass to weave the mess together with roots after the
first light rains. Native stuff would kick in later in the year and
hold the soil in place long term. NO CAN DO! The whole area is
"protected."

I thus enjoy the delicious sight of $millions/day beings spent to
protect $billions of housing that will all be swept away by February
anyway - along with the native endangered Half-Blind Walking Fly and
the squatting but still endangered Patagonian Coughing Weasel. Pray
for record heavy rains.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
  #9  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Bill Vajk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 505
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity

Robert J. Kolker wrote:

Uncle Al wrote:


Horrible bull**** explicitly contradicted by observation. It is a
mark of the psychotic crank that it cannot be educated with literature
citations.


Al, your retorts are measured and quiet. No vitriol. Are you feeling
alright?



Still waiting for the next explosion......

  #10  
Old October 24th 03 posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
George Dishman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,103
Default Electrostatic Aspects of Gravity


"ralph sansbury" wrote in message
...
See www.bestweb.net/~sansbury/book03.htm


Ralph is already aware of this:

http://galileo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/rel...ess030921.html

"The Deep Space Network tracking station in Goldstone,
Calif., received the last signal at 12:43:14 PDT. The
delay is due to the time it takes for the signal to
travel to Earth."

George


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electrostatic Gravity&Light Speed Geeman Physics - General Discussion 3 September 16th 03 06:06 PM
Electrostatic Gravity&Light Speed Bob May Physics - General Discussion 3 September 10th 03 03:55 PM
Electrostatic Gravity&Light Speed Bilge Physics - General Discussion 0 September 5th 03 11:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Charity Gifts - News - Loans - Mortgage Calculator - Loans