![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: faster, ftl, gravity, light, speed, than |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
FTL ( Faster Than Light) Is it The Speed Of Gravity?
http://www.msnbc.com/news/750150.asp?cp1=1#0310153 They are starting to seriously debate this FTL question. I worked on this about 20 years ago and discovered that The Speed Of Gravity is faster than ligth speed. Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message ... FTL ( Faster Than Light) Is it The Speed Of Gravity? http://www.msnbc.com/news/750150.asp?cp1=1#0310153 They are starting to seriously debate this FTL question. I worked on this about 20 years ago and discovered that The Speed Of Gravity is faster than ligth speed. And if they found faster than light information transfer, do you think Nature would publish it? Right... These guys are working on old news, and were not expecting to find anything surprising... I prefer reading the story of the foetus with three parents, or the talking dog. If you cannot transfer your information completely into the imaginary realm, and back again, you will never have effective FTL communications. Greysky www.allocations.cc |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message ... FTL ( Faster Than Light) Is it The Speed Of Gravity? http://www.msnbc.com/news/750150.asp?cp1=1#0310153 They are starting to seriously debate this FTL question. I worked on this about 20 years ago and discovered that The Speed Of Gravity is faster than ligth speed. Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ Gravity force field is instantaneous! Sincerely, Mathew Orman www.ultra-faster-than-light.com www.radio-faster-than-light.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"S. Enterprize Company" a écrit dans le message de ... FTL ( Faster Than Light) Is it The Speed Of Gravity? http://www.msnbc.com/news/750150.asp?cp1=1#0310153 Nothing new in this article and no proof of FTL. FG |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mathew Orman wrote: "S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message ... FTL ( Faster Than Light) Is it The Speed Of Gravity? http://www.msnbc.com/news/750150.asp?cp1=1#0310153 They are starting to seriously debate this FTL question. I worked on this about 20 years ago and discovered that The Speed Of Gravity is faster than ligth speed. Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ Gravity force field is instantaneous! Yes, it 'is' instantaneous. I couldn't agree more. Since it cannot be screened, there is no mechanism for producing gravity waves. Consider a ring of concentric circular orbits around the Sun, the force on these orbiting masses never varies. Now a mass freefalls directly toward the Sun cutting through these concentric orbital lines. As it passes each mass on its way down, will it experience some force/mass other than that experienced by the adjacent orbiting mass? If so, then the gravitational force would be a variable determined by some component of radial velocity of a mass. However, the two perpendicularly moving masses are located in exactly the same field as they pass each other, thus it would seem that any variation in force must be due to some other field superposed over the Sun's static gravitational field, unless of course the field is regarded as a pure gravitomagnetic field rather than a static field, in which case the force will indeed vary with the relative velocity of the masses. This is in fact the case, i.e. the gravitation field is a composite vector field, as I've already shown in a previous thread, and thus the variations wrt variously moving masses are not due to propagational delays, but are due to the vector aspect of the gravitational field. I.e. gravity is instantaneous. A similar argument applies to static electric fields. There are however (in this case) real delays associated with a change in the source charge density or configuration. These delays are not however delays in field strength, they are due rather to the superposing of the fields of the displacement currents generated by the change. The far field charges instantaneously experience both the source field changes and the secondary field changes superposed over each other. This superposition of primary and secondary fields produces a virtually null far field for some definite period. In effect, light is itself nothing more than a group velocity propagation, an mere effect of phase interference between instantaneous fields. Richard Perry Sincerely, Mathew Orman www.ultra-faster-than-light.com www.radio-faster-than-light.com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Electrostatic Gravity&Light Speed | Geeman | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | September 16th 03 07:06 PM |
| Electrostatic Gravity&Light Speed | Bob May | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | September 10th 03 04:55 PM |
| Electrostatic Gravity&Light Speed | Bilge | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | September 6th 03 12:02 AM |
| Faster than light | Adam | Physics - General Discussion | 11 | August 17th 03 10:49 AM |
| Communication Faster Than Light | Mathew Orman | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 3rd 03 02:29 PM |