![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: analysis, exotic, risk, wmd |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
update on Chapter 9 of Sir Martin Rees's "Our Final Hour" Sir Martin
is the head of DAMTP I think? See also new message from Russia below. Thanks Gary. This just in: #1 On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 07:17 AM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote: critical look at risk assessments for global catastrophes http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0009204 Authors: Adrian Kent (DAMTP, University of Cambridge) Comments: Some discussions extended in response to referee comments Report-no: DAMTP-2000-105 Subj-class: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology; Physics and Society Recent papers by Busza et al. (BJSW) and Dar et al. (DDH) argue that astrophysical data can be used to establish small bounds on the risk of a ``killer strangelet'' catastrophe scenario in the RHIC and ALICE collider experiments. DDH and other commentators (initially including BJSW) suggested that these empirical bounds alone do give sufficient reassurance. This seems unsupportable when the bounds are expressed in terms of expected cost -- a good measure, according to standard risk analysis arguments. For example, DDH's main bound, $p_{\rm catastrophe} 2 \times 10^{-8}$, implies only that the expectation value of the number of deaths is bounded by 120. This paper reappraises the DDH and BJSW risk bounds by comparing risk policy in other areas. For example, it is noted that, even if highly risk tolerant assumptions are made and no value is placed on the lives of future generations, a catastrophe risk no higher than $\approx 10^{-15}$ per year would be required for consistency with established policy for radiation hazard risk minimization. It is concluded that the costs of small risks of catastrophe have been significantly underestimated by BJSW (initially), by DDH and by other commentators. Lessons for future policy are proposed. ------------------------------ #2 Message from Russia Oct 16, 2003 Dear Mr Sarfatti! Was glad to receive this highly important message. The problem of Chinese WMD is also ocupying attention of competent & responsible people in Russia; - concerned with future of our national security. Such concern has sufficient reason - as there are widely known intense Chinese activities in Russia, aimed at legal and/or illegal acquisition of Russian defence-oriented and/or double use technologies; - especially those of Leading Edge level, including vacuum & psychotronic technologies. Chinese are behaving in Russia much bolder than in USA & other Western countries (where they also try to get new military technologies); - as, besides of higher corruptability of Russian officials (and poor starving defence scientists & engineers: immediate owners of know-how, with whom Chinese agents try to make drect deals when possible), there may exist a measure of political support on part of former non-converted (if even they'd offered some lip service to "democratization") Communists - which are glad to support their "ideological comrades". (Perhaps, because of this were hushed some legal actions undertaken in cases of most blatant violations of laws governing exports of technologies having possible military applications.) As I've noted in my previous email, there are also Russian "democratic" ideological sympathizers to China - and also people, believed to be connected with "military masonic elite" (people of this kind, - which could be regarded as Russian counterparts of members of US Pentagon Meditation Club, - had reintroduced in Russian Army General HQ seances of collective meditation, periodically performed in f. USSR in '20s-'30s, until its organizers, which were followers of Masonic/Rosicrucian Initiate Nicholas Roerich, were killed by Stalinists in '37-'38), which have their own complicated agenda in regard to China. (In this connection there may be recalled injunction of A. Bailey: see on pp. 130-34 of "The Externalization of the Hierarchy": "Russia will turn its attention towards East and will effectuate there vast changes as far as Pacific".) Perhaps, controlled leakage of Leading Edge research data might be most feasible in current situation way to effectuate such changes. Here may be recalled essentially similar situation with so-called "Soviet atomic espionage" in USA during & after WWII; - which, as say some US experts (see, eg, on pp. 368-69 of R. Vesco & D. Childres' "Man-made UFOs", AUP Press, 1994), was not only tolerated but even covertly encouraged by top US authorities (which allegedly belonged to then variant of mentioned by you "Trotskyite/neocon cabal"; in "Pentagon Aliens" of W. Lyne they're called "military masonic elite"). In fact, otherwise it'll be difficult to explain how guarded 24 hours a day top US nuclear experts like Einstein, Oppenheimer, Fermi & others could not only pass information to Soviet KGBeasts (which were under observation of US intelligence, as those bloody thugs stood out against more civilized background of scientific community where they moved) but even enjoy services of KGB top-class whores (this allegedly did Einstein - as was published in one of "Sci. Am." articles). Reason for this was quite clear; - as it was said in "Man-made UFOs", "USA could not wage multitrilion-dollar arms' race with itself". It needed well-controlled "sparring partner" - and such partner was found in Soviet "military masonic elite" (which was founded by Leon Trotsky - which introduced Masonic 5-pointed star as symbol of Red Army: whose colour corresponds to that of Crown of Ancient Lower Egypt - while white colour of US Army 5-pointed star is that of Crown of Upper Egypt!), which even Stalin could not totally exterminate. As say some people, feeling "cold war nostalgy" (of whom there is a considerable number among now jobless & starving members of f. Soviet military-industrial-scientific complex), organizaton of "cold war" must be regarded as supremely successful feat of global-scale social engineering; - which allowed to proimote scientific & technological progress with unprecedented in history speed (which might be critically important for the survival of Earth, as without Cold War-created nuclear/missile/computer technologies we couldn't defend our planet from possible asteroid/comet impacts - which'll bring more devastation than full-scale nuclear war!). Responsible organizers, which had no wish to perish in "accidental nuclear holocaust", took due precautions against quite possible incidents; - having established a vastly ramified network of borth secret & (semi)official contacts (which were mentioned on pp. 94-95 of '97 edition of Ph. Corso Sr.'s book - and which allegedly helped to defuse timely Caribbean crisis) . I may personally witness truth of Col. Corso's statements in this area, as I myself had particpated - in humble (I was just 22-25 years'-old at this time) but responsible role of trusted interpreter/assistant - since 1968 to 1971 in sanctioned by Politbureau confidential (but formally non-secret) meetings between top Soviet psi-research experts under leadership of Dr. Sergeyev ("No. 1 in entire East bloc", according to J. Alexander's '80s estimation) and Western psi-explorers guided by Prof. J. G. Pratt ("No. 1 in USA", according to the same source), who was then working on contract with ONI. (Regretfully, now Prof. Pratt is also dead; - but my words might be confirmed by still productively working in NY Maimonides Hospital Dr. Montague Ullman, - with whom Dr. Sergeyev & me met exactly 35 years ago: on 14-16 Oct '68 - I've well remembered this date as 14 Oct is my birthday.) Let's hope that similar precautions are taken now in regard to technology transmission to China (Russian experts believe that when USA allows numerous "controlled technology leakages" to China, they also take similar precautions - perhaps, members of Russian and American "secret elite" even coordinate their activities in this area: cf. some aspects of "US-USSR-China leakage plot", described in "Dunn's Conundrum" by S. Lee; Sphere Books, 1986); - else living on this planet will become very soon a very uncomfortable occupation. Regretfully, I can only hope - as I've lost access to reliable sources of information on secret Russo-Chinese transactions since death of my respected teacher (in life as well as in science) Dr. Sergeyev (who had good connections in military intelligence community); - which happened on 29 Oct 1999: soon before end of "overpermissive" rule of Yeltsin (KGB-educated Putin tries to put restrictions on sensitive activities of military intelligence: long-time rival of KGB, as correctly noted Col. Corso). Many analysts here, concerned with problem of "exotic WMD", - which have considerable "psychological warfare" skills but little serious scientific training, - have no choice but to regard this problem from their specific viewpoint: as another instrument of psychological warfare; - which is much more handy than, say, use in the role of instruments of intimidation & political coercion threats with nuclear (and other "hard") weapons, as it can be used in "virtual format" (that is, it can produce psychological impression - if not on experts, then on gullible public opinion: this "democracy's soft underbelly" - but no tangible proofs, incriminating its alleged users, can ever be found: cf. situation with Iraqi WMD!). First this term became publicized around 1984 - at the peak of alleged Reagan's preparations to deliver pre-emptive nuclear strike to f. USSR (see "Dunn's Conundrum") - by Soviet-sympathizing "left ecologist" J. Schell (who employed the term "virtual nuclear weapons" in a slightly different role). At this critical for USSR time Soviet "influence agents" in the West started coordinated campaign of psychological warfare against governments of England & West Germany which allowed installation in their countries of US first strike weapons: cruise missiles & "Pershings-2"; - which "could fly in any selected window of Kremlin" just few minutes after launch, so that elderly Soviet rulers will not have time not only get to nuclear shelter but even to put on their trousers. It was rumoured that compact nuclear charges were secretly implanted by Soviet agents in key sensitive places of England & W. Germany (possibly near government residences); - which'll be activted in case of US nuclear attack on USSR: it was as impossible to determine, in then real political situation, whether such rumours were false or true as to know whether Schroedinger's Cat is alive or dead without opening its box (which in case of "nuclear cat" will become political Box of Pandora!). That can be called a most spectacular example of use of "virtual nuclear weapons technology" - which, involving as little real risk as possible, is failsafe: always some psychologically unstable fraction of population will believe gladly in alarming news (like modern ecoalarmists or believers in near Apocalypse); - and, if their percentage (and especially mental coherence of their psi-fields: cf. TM data on organization of collective meditations) will be high enough, they might force their own governments to accede to Soviet demands - without a need for the latter to move a finger! F. Soviet ambassador in USA M. Dobrynin writes in his memoirs that during 1983-4 Soviet intelligence had undertaken unprecedented in scale operation, rying to detect signs of preparation to nuclear strike against USSR - about possibility of which Andropov: suspected of being a Mason got warnings through mysterious even for KGB channels. Here it can be said that Soviet psi-warfare experts made their own use out of popular in '50s in USA & other Western countries "Soviet nuclear scare": Western propaganda has successfully enough intimidated its own population with threat of "Soviet secret agents with nuclear suitcases" (see, eg, F. Forsythe's "Fourth Protocol" - which was read with high interest even by Mrs. Thatcher) - preparing thus fertile psychological grounds for Western "nuclear protest movements". Now such heavy & inelegantly crude instrument as "nuclear blackmail" (even virtual) is relegated to such outsiders as "rogue states" and/or "international terrorists'; - and members of "Inner Circle" (including China and perhaps f. Iraq) are preferring to operate such moe handy instrument as "(virtual) sychotronic blackmail" - which not only offers lesser probability of dangerous accidents, but promises incomparably greater rewards personally to its operators: which, almost without exception, - as are most members of international-level intellectual elite, - are dedicated to the idea of Global Commonwealth of Intellectuals: some variant of old idea of International Government of Scientists (publicized by Masonic/Theosophic/Rosicrucian sources as "Global Spiritual Government of Shamballa"). Any talk about psi-weapons does attract welcome interest (and, possibly, even more welcome funds) to this problem; - which, in order to be widely enough publicized, must necessarily have its own highly dedicated adversaries (as its partisans simply cannot start hot enough controversy among themselves!). Never trusting anything to chance KGB had personally selected in Soviet times "professional psi-(or UFO etc.)debunkers"; - which were periodically activated, if there appeared a need to carry some action of "psychotronic intimidation" of foreign governments. (The actual intimidation "at close range" was performed by foreign colleagues of Soviet psi-researchers (or rather their Masonic bosses) - which highly benefited from government funding of explorations how to neutralize Soviet psi-menace.) Such system functioned before "perestroika" more or less smoothly & efficiently as an Engine of Progress; - helping to maintain sufficiently high but well-regulated level of "international psi-voltage", sufficient for driving The Wheels of Progress with ever increasing speed. (Many of most interesting works - especially in USSR - in such "exotic" areas as vacuum explorations, non-local communication etc. will never be undertaken without such "cold war engine"; - which became clear when Soviet science collapsed after "catastroika". Of course, job-deprived scientists eagerly wish to rebuild a similar - but, if possibly, having more reliable character - mechanism for effectuating necessary interaction between Science & Society; - believing that their US colleagues, which (as they think) started global antiterrorist campaign as a kind of substitute to Cold War, do also share their expectations.) As says social synrgetics, - confirming empirical data of social scientists of former ages, - dynamic stabilization of as complex system as global community needs an input of "controlled chaos"; - perhaps, even having format of "less-than-war" paramilitary operations in order to prevent formation of large hidden pockets of destructive energies: cf. prevention of destructive avalanches by properly timed preventive explosions. There is deep wisdom in words of St. Paul: "when evryone will speak only about Peace then disaster will befall them". So realistically thinking political leaders must be concerned not with Establishing of Paradise on Earth - which is a busyness for angels - but with not allowing our planet to sink too deep into Hell: which, according to all esoteric teachings, Earth actually is - recall that in Bible Satan: Lord of Hell is called "Prince of This World"! Naturally, a new kind of World Balance technologies, - now involving use of data of Leading Edge research, - calls for a new kind of people to carry through these policies; - and such people preferably must have a good scientific education. (Here Mrs Lapayeva & her followers see promise of their eventual victory - because old generation politicians will be simply unable to communicate with their foreign counterparts at, say, negotiations for limitation of psychotronic/genome arms' race. Such negotiations, of course, will be best advertisement & promotion to progress of these - and other - new supertechnologies, providing with rewarding jobs large numbers of highly intelligent well-educated people: the finest flower & best hope of Humankind.) Their education must necessarily include also mind-expanding technologies; - so that they might contain without difficulties Machiavellian/Orwellian (see also Kautilya's "Arthashastra") "double thinking" - which needs higher-dimensional psychobiocomputers. (In higher-dimensional spaces it's quite natural for objects to move simultaneously in different directions - as well as it's quite natural for quantum computers to be simultaneously in several states: present-day "postmodern approach" is an attempt to realize such "quantum world vision".) Here I can only solidarize with mentioned in G. Zukav's "Dancing Wu Li masters" slogan of MIT (or perhaps SRI) Leading Edge physicists: "Attention! Study of physics can expand your awareness!"; - recommending future political leaders to study modern physics (or better mathematics) - even if not too deeply, which may become addictive. I wish to thank also you for your extensive informational exchange activities in the area of high-tech weapons' politics; - which help scientists & political activists of different countries to establish closer "psychic entanglement", - which will be very helpful in process of formation of necessary (if humankind wishes to survive) for sustaining even relative peace (while allowing to promote Progress, which is often omitted by too shrt-sighted proponents of Sustainable Development: but the world will turn into worst hell if to deprive people from opportunity to grow) International Government of Scientists: "realpolitik incarnation" of Global Noospheric Brain/Mind of Teilard/Vernadsky." Note: I wrote most of the original drafts of the physics parts of "Dancing Wu Li Masters" and closely edited final versions of it with Gary. I did not write the New Age spiritual and psychological content of the book however. That was pure Gary. :-) "I'd be glad to receive your feedback to this message. I think you wouldn't object that I'd transmit some of your messages to such my competent & responsible Leading Edge research colleagues as, for example, Acad. Akimov, Acad. Shipov or Prof. Gariaev. With best wishes, Sincerely yours Constantin I. Ivanenko" |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WMD in Iraq , UFO & Doomsday Fact or Fiction? | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | November 4th 03 04:02 AM |
| Iraq WMD disinformation | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | October 13th 03 04:40 AM |
| Skeptical Inquirer on Iraq ET UFO WMD | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | September 27th 03 07:12 PM |
| Data analysis software | www.DrHuang.com | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 22nd 03 07:01 AM |
| Data analysis software | www.DrHuang.com | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 13th 03 01:45 PM |