![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: model, smart, standard |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Smart Model vs. The Standard Model
Open for debate...... . Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Smart Model vs. The Standard Model
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/afp/20.../universe.html Quoting from LINK above: "These fluctuations do not fit in with the "Standard Model" of a flat, always expanding Universe, they reported in Thursday's issue of Nature, the British science weekly. " ( Another reference LINK) http://physicsweb.org/article/news/7/10/5 It appears that The Standard Model is AGAIN shown to be incorrect in it's analysis of the universe. If one observes the Smart Model it is based on intelligent structures whether sub-atomic, stellar, galactic or universal. In fact, look at the similarities of the Smart Model at the atomic level with a radon atom and a uranium atom and compare it with the new view of the finite intelligent structured universe shown in the various links. Smart Model Intelligent Structure of radon http://members.aol.com/smart1234/SmartModelRadon.gif Smart Model Uranium http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Sm...Uranium238.htm It appears that since the oldest element in this universe is uranium, and the unified fields according to the Smart Model Theory are showing that the structural shape of the universe is similar not only similar at the atomic ( and sub-atomic level) but at the universal level similar to the Smart Model uranium or radon. But this is only a limited view of the overall view of the universe as we know it, according to the Smart Model Theory. In time the universe should look like this. http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Ol...ewUniverse.jpg For now we see an early view of the intelligent dodecahedral shape of the early universe. As more black holes form and expansion continues, the intelligent shape of the universe should show something similar to the Smart Model sub-atomic level proton where something like the old universe is like an anti-proton, compared to the other side a proton ( new universe) shaped universe, that oscillates and recycles. This would give the intelligent structure of the universe movement that is perpetual similar to the pertpetual movement of a proton ( 10^30 years). Smart's Alt. Physics News Group http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1 S. Enterprize (Science Journal) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems with the Standard Model ... - But No problems With The Smart Model | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | September 28th 03 08:42 AM |
| Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | September 25th 03 06:41 PM |
| Standard-model and spacetime algebra | John Baez | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | August 28th 03 08:40 PM |
| Smart Model Proton Mass (Kg) Calculated With Comparisons To The Standard Model | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 16th 03 04:23 AM |
| The Smart Model is the atomic model of the future whether you like it or not... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 13th 03 12:44 PM |