Charles Cagle wrote:


Now that's the problem in a nutshell. The P-P process has never been
observed, no once. Not in any experiment in the history of science.
So you presume something that has nothing to do with reality. I think
it was Hans Bethe who invented the process (or at least built a horse
to ride on from its assumptions) and no one has taken him or anyone
else to task on it. When one cannot differentiate the work product of
a so-called scientist from that of a pathological liar then the proper
conclusion is that there is no difference and that science which makes
use of such work products has itself become pathological.



Not only is the pp-chain observed, but The Solar Neutrino Problem Has Been Closed
http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2002/586.html

In article , Sam Wormley
wrote:

Charles Cagle wrote:


Now that's the problem in a nutshell. The P-P process has never been
observed, no once. Not in any experiment in the history of science.
So you presume something that has nothing to do with reality. I think
it was Hans Bethe who invented the process (or at least built a horse
to ride on from its assumptions) and no one has taken him or anyone
else to task on it. When one cannot differentiate the work product of
a so-called scientist from that of a pathological liar then the proper
conclusion is that there is no difference and that science which makes
use of such work products has itself become pathological.



Not only is the pp-chain observed, but The Solar Neutrino Problem Has Been
Closed
http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2002/586.html

Once again, Sam shows us that he is incapable of separating the
pseudoscientific hype from facts.

Charles Cagle