A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 25th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

http://hipe.uia.ac.be/cmt/atom.html

Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then
release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting
together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated
particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital
fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom.
This animation shows that like particles DO repel each other. In the QM
model of the atom, used with the Periodic Table of Elements, there can be
hundreds of "like charged" electrons in the orbitals. But as they run into
each other and repel, or as other FREE ELECTRONS collide with the electrons in
the QM orbitals, YOU CAN SEE ( with your own eyes) that the orbitals become
even MORE chaotic and NOT a nice looking orbital field, like an s orbital or p
and so on, predicted by the QM model.
The Smart Model DOES NOT USE this nonsense of orbital electron fields. The
fields it uses is the Aether Fluid ( sub-sub-partcles) that spin in an
INTELLIGENT CREATED structural angular momentum field or Helix Spiral Field (
vortex field) that forms each sub-particle. Then each sub-particle interacts
directly, as The Smart Model Theory shows. There is a direct stable interaction
between each electron with the neutrino and proton, per atom of an element. The
atomic structures observed in REAL atomic images ARE showing that the Smart
Model predictions ARE correct in regard to element structure.
If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the chemical
level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each other
in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java
animation.

You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on
earth today.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Ads
  #2  
Old September 25th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

http://hipe.uia.ac.be/cmt/atom.html

Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and then
release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles interacting
together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated
particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice orbital
fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom.
This animation shows that like particles DO repel each other. In the QM
model of the atom, used with the Periodic Table of Elements, there can be
hundreds of "like charged" electrons in the orbitals. But as they run into
each other and repel, or as other FREE ELECTRONS collide with the electrons
in
the QM orbitals, YOU CAN SEE ( with your own eyes) that the orbitals become
even MORE chaotic and NOT a nice looking orbital field, like an s orbital or
p
and so on, predicted by the QM model.
The Smart Model DOES NOT USE this nonsense of orbital electron fields. The
fields it uses is the Aether Fluid ( sub-sub-partcles) that spin in an
INTELLIGENT CREATED structural angular momentum field or Helix Spiral Field (
vortex field) that forms each sub-particle. Then each sub-particle interacts
directly, as The Smart Model Theory shows. There is a direct stable
interaction
between each electron with the neutrino and proton, per atom of an element.
The
atomic structures observed in REAL atomic images ARE showing that the Smart
Model predictions ARE correct in regard to element structure.
If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the
chemical
level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each
other
in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java
animation.

You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on
earth today.


And as soon as the world realizes that The Smart Model was correct for all
the years and years and years, while Smart1234 was made to look like a fool, a
stupid idiot, rejected, hated, put through HELL on earth, and damned by people
trying to control him and his mind, by trying take away his free will to live
peacefully and to do good things and charity to help others and science and
physics, don't forget to add your donations to ( S. Enterprize Co. & Smart1234)
of 10% per profit for each new re-written book in the entire world, for all
future generations. This will assist me in ALL my HARD work I DID in physics in
this world. And it should make me a multi-trillionaire. I could even buy most
of this planet eventually. Oh, but of course it would then be transferred to
The Lord for His good pleasure. The True and Faithful Owner of this planet and
universe, Who is, was and shall be, One with The Creator, God ( The Heavenly
Father).


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


  #3  
Old September 25th 03 posted to sci.physics
DHatheway
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Thanks to Warner Brothers animations, I've got proof that coyotes are
indestructible.

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message
...
Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

http://hipe.uia.ac.be/cmt/atom.html

Go to this LINK shown above and observe ( click on) the E-fixed mode

java
animation. Click on an animated particle and hold mouse button down and

then
release and you can observe the repeling actions of the particles

interacting
together as they collide with each other. Also try adding more animated
particles. What do you observe? TOTAL CHAOS. You DO NOT observe nice

orbital
fields predicted by the Quantum Mechanics Model of the atom.
This animation shows that like particles DO repel each other. In the QM
model of the atom, used with the Periodic Table of Elements, there can be
hundreds of "like charged" electrons in the orbitals. But as they run

into
each other and repel, or as other FREE ELECTRONS collide with the

electrons in
the QM orbitals, YOU CAN SEE ( with your own eyes) that the orbitals

become
even MORE chaotic and NOT a nice looking orbital field, like an s orbital

or p
and so on, predicted by the QM model.
The Smart Model DOES NOT USE this nonsense of orbital electron fields.

The
fields it uses is the Aether Fluid ( sub-sub-partcles) that spin in an
INTELLIGENT CREATED structural angular momentum field or Helix Spiral

Field (
vortex field) that forms each sub-particle. Then each sub-particle

interacts
directly, as The Smart Model Theory shows. There is a direct stable

interaction
between each electron with the neutrino and proton, per atom of an

element. The
atomic structures observed in REAL atomic images ARE showing that the

Smart
Model predictions ARE correct in regard to element structure.
If one uses the electron orbital for structure and bondings at the

chemical
level, all you end up with is TOTAL CHAOS of electrons running into each

other
in any direction. You can see with your own eyes this occurrs in the java
animation.

You might as well face it. The Smart Model is the most correct model on
earth today.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/




  #4  
Old September 25th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default Further Proof The Smart Model is Correct And QM Model is Incorrect

Thanks to Warner Brothers animations, I've got proof that coyotes are
indestructible.


Thanks to a few correct laws in science such as like charges ( electrons)
repel. And thanks to Newtows Laws of Motion, we can see what happens with every
action there is an equal and opposite reaction, even at the atomic level.
Thanks to the Smart Model for showing us all that the QM Model is incorrect and
the Standard Model points to the direction that there is a more correct model,
it is The Smart Model.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again .... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 4 September 21st 03 12:34 AM
If The Smart Model is Correct... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 1 July 15th 03 10:57 AM
If The Smart Model is Correct... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 5 July 13th 03 04:53 AM
Smart Model Singularity Is Much More Correct Than Hawking's Belief.... . S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 July 11th 03 04:43 AM
Smart Model Singularity Is Much More Correct Than Hawking's Belief.... . S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 July 10th 03 01:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Loans - Loans - Problem Mortgage - Loans