A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , ,

Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,398
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..

Let us put both supposed truthful facts up,.

Supposed fact one :
Atomic clocks tick at the same rate no matter where they go
and never change rate at all.

Supposed fact two :
Atomic clocks show different times when brought back together
from such trips relating to fact one.

Now,
Knowing that fact two is a final outcome, and has been varified in every
test
known how could fact one still be true?
The answer:
It cant.
and sadly
It is too simple for the brainwashed rubber ruler crew to understand.
Conflicting truths to the first degree.
Hence, a complete loss of logic since both supposed truths above
can not be true at the same time about the atomic clocks.


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman


Ads
  #2  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,297
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..


Spaceman wrote:

[snip]

Tell you what, space****.

When you understand Algebra, Calculus, and Newtonian mechanics
(Newton's laws and Gravity), we will try to teach you relativity.

  #3  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,398
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..


"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
ups.com...
| Tell you what, space****.
|
| When you understand Algebra, Calculus, and Newtonian mechanics
| (Newton's laws and Gravity), we will try to teach you relativity.
|

I have learned about such things Eric and I actually found
simple factual problems with time dilation that you seem to want to ignore.
It seems you don't care about conflicting truths like such.
That is pretty sad for a physicist.
Accepting conflicting truths as if they were a new bible that should
not be questioned ever.
Go worship some more rubber rulers Eric before they bounce away.
lol


  #4  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,398
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..


"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
oups.com...

snipped non relavant rants
dang,
nothing left.
just like Erics logic section of his brain.
lol



  #5  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Mark Martin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,334
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..


Spaceman wrote:

I have learned about such things Eric and I actually found
simple factual problems with time dilation that you seem to want to ignore.
It seems you don't care about conflicting truths like such.
That is pretty sad for a physicist.


Yes, yes, yes. Everyone who doesn't agree with Space-Man is "sad".
It's a sad, sad world, Space-Man.

Accepting conflicting truths as if they were a new bible that should
not be questioned ever.


On the contrary. You are questioning an idea, as is your priveledge.
In response others are questioning *your* idea, telling you why it is
that they find your reasoning inadequate.

-Mark Martin

  #6  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,297
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..


Spaceman wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
oups.com...

snipped non relavant rants
dang,
nothing left.
just like Erics logic section of his brain.


Answer the question, spaceman.

What is the derivative of a constant function?

It should be easy if you actually understand calculus.

lol


  #7  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,398
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..


"Mark Martin" wrote in message
oups.com...
|
| Spaceman wrote:
|
| I have learned about such things Eric and I actually found
| simple factual problems with time dilation that you seem to want to
ignore.
| It seems you don't care about conflicting truths like such.
| That is pretty sad for a physicist.
|
| Yes, yes, yes. Everyone who doesn't agree with Space-Man is "sad".
| It's a sad, sad world, Space-Man.
|
| Accepting conflicting truths as if they were a new bible that should
| not be questioned ever.
|
| On the contrary. You are questioning an idea, as is your priveledge.
| In response others are questioning *your* idea, telling you why it is
| that they find your reasoning inadequate.

The only thing I am hearing is that both statements are true.
and that alone is sad no matter how much you don't think so.
They simply can not be both true.
It is a joke to real science.

BTW: Got any facts that can prove how both supposed truths could be
correct or are you just being Eric ass kisser?


  #8  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,398
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..


"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
oups.com...

snipped diversion tactics

still nothing about the post itself huh Eric?


  #9  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Mark Martin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,334
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..


Eric Gisse wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
oups.com...

snipped non relavant rants
dang,
nothing left.
just like Erics logic section of his brain.


Answer the question, spaceman.

What is the derivative of a constant function?

It should be easy if you actually understand calculus.


A few months back I encoded my phone number in the form of an
integral expresion and challenged tj Frazir to evaluate it, and thus
demonstrate that he was at least skilled enough to do that much. It was
a rather easy problem, but he danced around it 'til the cows came home.
You could do the same for Space-Man. Will he also cut a rug? Probably
yes.

-Mark Martin

  #10  
Old January 27th 06 posted to sci.physics
Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,398
Default Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..


"Mark Martin" wrote in message
oups.com...
snipped diversion tactics

Nothing about the post either huh Mark?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What causes time dilation? hunkahunkaburninluv Physics - General Discussion 212 September 27th 04 12:17 AM
What causes time dilation? Van Jacques Physics - General Discussion 0 September 13th 04 11:43 AM
Time dilation Van Jacques Physics - General Discussion 6 September 6th 04 05:11 PM
Time dilation Van Jacques Physics - General Discussion 2 September 6th 04 09:36 AM
Time dilation Won Physics - General Discussion 0 September 2nd 04 05:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Compare - Advertising - Credit Card - Problem Mortgage - Credit Cards