![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: collisions |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have the following problem:
Ball 1 and Ball 2 are rolling toward each other at the same speed, 5 m/s. Ball 1 has a mass of 8kg, and ball 2 has a mass of 2kg. After collision, ball 1 is observed to move with a velocity of 2 m/s in the same direction as v1 (to the right). What is the velocity of Ball 2 after collision? So I can solve for v2 final, which is 7 m/s. This other question asks if the collision was elastic or not. At first I thought it was elastic because it's two balls bouncing off each other, which is always elastic unless there is mention of loss of energy somewhere. But it's actually inelastic, and I was supposed to examine the kinetic energies before and after. Is the main reason why the collision was inelastic is because they forcefully assigned ball 1 with a velocity? Thanks, - Eli |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Eli Luong" wrote in message oups.com... I have the following problem: Ball 1 and Ball 2 are rolling toward each other at the same speed, 5 m/s. Ball 1 has a mass of 8kg, and ball 2 has a mass of 2kg. After collision, ball 1 is observed to move with a velocity of 2 m/s in the same direction as v1 (to the right). What is the velocity of Ball 2 after collision? 5*8 - 5*2 = 50 50-8*2 = 34 34/2 = 17m/s = v2 So I can solve for v2 final, which is 7 m/s. This other question asks if the collision was elastic or not. At first I thought it was elastic because it's two balls bouncing off each other, which is always elastic unless there is mention of loss of energy somewhere. But it's actually inelastic, and I was supposed to examine the kinetic energies before and after. Is the main reason why the collision was inelastic is because they forcefully assigned ball 1 with a velocity? no. always assume it is inelastic, unless they specify it, as it absorbes energy it is difficult to make the problem simple when you throw in a loss. then Angle hits....... .. Thanks, - Eli |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Eli Luong" wrote in message
oups.com... I have the following problem: Ball 1 and Ball 2 are rolling toward each other at the same speed, 5 m/s. Ball 1 has a mass of 8kg, and ball 2 has a mass of 2kg. After collision, ball 1 is observed to move with a velocity of 2 m/s in the same direction as v1 (to the right). What is the velocity of Ball 2 after collision? So I can solve for v2 final, which is 7 m/s. This other question asks if the collision was elastic or not. At first I thought it was elastic because it's two balls bouncing off each other, which is always elastic unless there is mention of loss of energy somewhere. But it's actually inelastic, and I was supposed to examine the kinetic energies before and after. Is the main reason why the collision was inelastic is because they forcefully assigned ball 1 with a velocity? It seems like you're trying to find the answer to the question in the words rather than the numbers. Always check the numbers. Momentum is always conserved, but kinetic energy may or may not be. If kinetic energy is conserved the collision was elastic, otherwise it was not. So if you're asked whether or not a collision was elastic, check the KE. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 10 Jan 2006, Eli Luong wrote:
I have the following problem: Ball 1 and Ball 2 are rolling toward each other at the same speed, 5 m/s. Ball 1 has a mass of 8kg, and ball 2 has a mass of 2kg. After collision, ball 1 is observed to move with a velocity of 2 m/s in the same direction as v1 (to the right). What is the velocity of Ball 2 after collision? So I can solve for v2 final, which is 7 m/s. This other question asks if the collision was elastic or not. At first I thought it was elastic because it's two balls bouncing off each other, which is always elastic unless there is mention of loss of energy somewhere. But it's actually inelastic, and I was supposed to examine the kinetic energies before and after. Is the main reason why the collision was inelastic is because they forcefully assigned ball 1 with a velocity? In a generic 1D collision problem, you know the initial velocities and the masses. Since you have conservation of momentum, you have one equation. If you don't know either final velocity, that leaves you with 2 unknowns, and you need a second equation. There are 2 common possibilities used in problems of this type: assume that the collision is elastic so that conservation of energy gives you another equation, or assume that the collision is totally inelastic (ie the two objects stick together), so both final velocities are the same. For something inbetween those two cases, the usual thing is to specify one of the final velocities, leaving you with only one unknown quantity. Sometimes you might see something like "assume that the collision is inelastic, with 10% of the energy being lost". -- Timo Nieminen - Home page: http://www.physics.uq.edu.au/people/nieminen/ E-prints: http://eprint.uq.edu.au/view/person/...,_Timo_A..html Shrine to Spirits: http://www.users.bigpond.com/timo_nieminen/spirits.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| particle collisions | Tzazak@gmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | December 11th 05 02:37 AM |
| Little Help with collisions | novelo | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | July 26th 05 10:59 PM |
| The Effects of Collisions | raychelle | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | February 24th 05 06:48 PM |
| momentum in 2D collisions | Rob | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | July 1st 04 11:54 PM |
| question on momentum non-headon collisions | martin | Physics - General Discussion | 26 | January 14th 04 07:27 PM |