A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 20th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,289
Default The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....

The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....

This shows Smart Model Structure prediction for Rb, based on NO ELECTRON
ORBITALS and No QM Model and No Standard Model. And the structures were built
using the fundamental Smart Model Deuterium Atoms Interacting Logically using
The Smart Model Theory developed since the Early 1990's.

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Rubidium.gif


This shows Bose-Einstein Condensate State of Rb, where they were able to slow
the spin angular speed of The Helix Spiral Field State ( or Vortex Field) of
the Rb atom.

http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/atfr...ons/Kuthai.pdf

You can see near exact same structures as compared to The Smart Model
Structure of Rb with your own eyes.


Then notice all the posts people that have made about me on these News Groups
for years, and how I was added to the Crank List. I guess you can see who the
real kooks are by now.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Ads
  #2  
Old September 20th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,289
Default The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....

The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....

This shows Smart Model Structure prediction for Rb, based on NO ELECTRON
ORBITALS and No QM Model and No Standard Model. And the structures were built
using the fundamental Smart Model Deuterium Atoms Interacting Logically using
The Smart Model Theory developed since the Early 1990's.

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Rubidium.gif


This shows Bose-Einstein Condensate State of Rb, where they were able to
slow
the spin angular speed of The Helix Spiral Field State ( or Vortex Field) of
the Rb atom.

http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/atfr...ons/Kuthai.pdf

You can see near exact same structures as compared to The Smart Model
Structure of Rb with your own eyes.


Then notice all the posts people that have made about me on these News
Groups
for years, and how I was added to the Crank List. I guess you can see who the
real kooks are by now.


This shows an animation of a liquid state of Rb where many Rb atoms are
interacting. In a solid state they would be still next to each other. Then go
right back to the above link showing the Bose-Einstein Condensate State of Rb
atoms slowed down slow enough to observe these structures in frozen solid
state.

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Rb2.gif

Then go back to all the posts made against me and The Smart Model Theory for
years, making me look like a fool, idiot, kook, crank, a religious fanatic, a
dummy, someone that has no idea what math is, who plugs numbers into MathCAD
having no meaning but stupidity and someone with NO PROOF.

As science progresses more in the future, you should begin to see more of
the INTERNAL structures of the particles and atoms AS THE SMART MODEL ALREADY
PREDICTED YEARS AND YEARS AGO BEFORE THEY EVEN CONCEIVED THE THOUGHT.
Then what happens to me? They will continue to ignore me and call me a kook.
Why? Because I disprove the QM Model, The Standard Model, and everything else
that has the word "quantum" in it. So in other words, The Smart Model replaces
and changes ALL physics as you know it and shows it was incorrect for all these
years and they must replace all books with the word quantum on it and use it as
a poor example of THE Most incorrect theory that ever existed, and a poor
example of past scientists that criticized me now and ignored me now using that
incorrect model.

Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


  #3  
Old September 20th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,289
Default The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....

The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....

This shows Smart Model Structure prediction for Rb, based on NO ELECTRON
ORBITALS and No QM Model and No Standard Model. And the structures were

built
using the fundamental Smart Model Deuterium Atoms Interacting Logically

using
The Smart Model Theory developed since the Early 1990's.

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Rubidium.gif


This shows Bose-Einstein Condensate State of Rb, where they were able to
slow
the spin angular speed of The Helix Spiral Field State ( or Vortex Field) of
the Rb atom.

http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/atfr...ons/Kuthai.pdf

You can see near exact same structures as compared to The Smart Model
Structure of Rb with your own eyes.


Then notice all the posts people that have made about me on these News
Groups
for years, and how I was added to the Crank List. I guess you can see who

the
real kooks are by now.


This shows an animation of a liquid state of Rb where many Rb atoms are
interacting. In a solid state they would be still next to each other. Then
go
right back to the above link showing the Bose-Einstein Condensate State of Rb
atoms slowed down slow enough to observe these structures in frozen solid
state.

http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/Rb2.gif

Then go back to all the posts made against me and The Smart Model Theory
for
years, making me look like a fool, idiot, kook, crank, a religious fanatic,
a
dummy, someone that has no idea what math is, who plugs numbers into MathCAD
having no meaning but stupidity and someone with NO PROOF.

As science progresses more in the future, you should begin to see more of
the INTERNAL structures of the particles and atoms AS THE SMART MODEL ALREADY
PREDICTED YEARS AND YEARS AGO BEFORE THEY EVEN CONCEIVED THE THOUGHT.
Then what happens to me? They will continue to ignore me and call me a
kook.
Why? Because I disprove the QM Model, The Standard Model, and everything else
that has the word "quantum" in it. So in other words, The Smart Model
replaces
and changes ALL physics as you know it and shows it was incorrect for all
these
years and they must replace all books with the word quantum on it and use it
as
a poor example of THE Most incorrect theory that ever existed, and a poor
example of past scientists that criticized me now and ignored me now using
that
incorrect model.



Then what? It's just a simple transaction of ALL things to The Lord, where
ALL people will _finally_ give credit to Him for ALL His hard work in physics
that NO ONE ever gave Him credit for. They kept Him in a religious church of
just belief. But the man made religion will be replaced because it won't be
just a belief anymore, but a proven fact of science, The Lord, IS God.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


  #4  
Old September 21st 03 posted to sci.physics
ghytrfvbnmju7654
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 409
Default The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....

(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message ...
The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....


http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/atfr...ons/Kuthai.pdf

You might want to actually read the article to determine how
large the vortices shown in these pictures are ... Then look
up how big an atom is ... A bit of a discrepancy, isn't it?
  #5  
Old September 21st 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,289
Default The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....

(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
...
The Smart Model Prediction Visually Correct Again ....


http://www.lkb.ens.fr/recherche/atfr...ons/Kuthai.pdf


You might want to actually read the article to determine how
large the vortices shown in these pictures are ... Then look
up how big an atom is ... A bit of a discrepancy, isn't it?


No, not really there is an Aether field around them too.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yet another Correct Prediction of Smart Model Anti-gravity Field S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 9 July 30th 03 02:22 AM
If The Smart Model is Correct... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 1 July 15th 03 11:57 AM
If The Smart Model is Correct... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 5 July 13th 03 05:53 AM
Smart Model Singularity Is Much More Correct Than Hawking's Belief.... . S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 July 11th 03 05:43 AM
Smart Model Singularity Is Much More Correct Than Hawking's Belief.... . S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 July 10th 03 02:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Web Design Forum - Debt Help - Loan - Credit Cards - Credit Card