The Apollo 17 returned with an astounding 240#'s of moon
rocks, which of course necessitated leaving one of the
astronauts on the moon, although not for the cannibalistic
reasons widely circulated in the press. Indeed there is no
evidence to support the lunar cannibalism theory, that's a
"crackpot" notion.

In the "Zaputer Film" where only two astronauts were filmed
actually leaving the capsule, the third astronaut is "explained
away" as having parachuted down and pick-up earlier.
But his astronaut suit is "dry" as he is filmed later.

He was a near twin of the stranded astronaut, except for the
mole on his left cheek should have been on his elbow, and
that's the "smokin gun". NASA's explanation that he ate
a hot-dog and missed his mouth and left a piece of relish
on his cheek, does not explain the missing "elbow mole",
not evident in the film.

Additionally, NASA refuses to do a DNA analysis that would
PROVE he is the same person!

Astounding
SPACE AGE TRUTHS.

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
ps.com...
The Apollo 17 returned with an astounding 240#'s of moon
rocks, which of course necessitated leaving one of the
astronauts on the moon, although not for the cannibalistic
reasons widely circulated in the press. Indeed there is no
evidence to support the lunar cannibalism theory, that's a
"crackpot" notion.

In the "Zaputer Film" where only two astronauts were filmed
actually leaving the capsule, the third astronaut is "explained
away" as having parachuted down and pick-up earlier.
But his astronaut suit is "dry" as he is filmed later.

He was a near twin of the stranded astronaut, except for the
mole on his left cheek should have been on his elbow, and
that's the "smokin gun". NASA's explanation that he ate
a hot-dog and missed his mouth and left a piece of relish
on his cheek, does not explain the missing "elbow mole",
not evident in the film.

Additionally, NASA refuses to do a DNA analysis that would
PROVE he is the same person!

Astounding
SPACE AGE TRUTHS.

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?

Richard Henry wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
ps.com...
The Apollo 17 returned with an astounding 240#'s of moon
rocks, which of course necessitated leaving one of the
astronauts on the moon, although not for the cannibalistic
reasons widely circulated in the press. Indeed there is no
evidence to support the lunar cannibalism theory, that's a
"crackpot" notion.

In the "Zaputer Film" where only two astronauts were filmed
actually leaving the capsule, the third astronaut is "explained
away" as having parachuted down and pick-up earlier.
But his astronaut suit is "dry" as he is filmed later.

He was a near twin of the stranded astronaut, except for the
mole on his left cheek should have been on his elbow, and
that's the "smokin gun". NASA's explanation that he ate
a hot-dog and missed his mouth and left a piece of relish
on his cheek, does not explain the missing "elbow mole",
not evident in the film.

Additionally, NASA refuses to do a DNA analysis that would
PROVE he is the same person!

Astounding
SPACE AGE TRUTHS.

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?

Quite right, Mr. Henry, One astronaut is missing, it should
be XI?IX.

[pathetic amount of overquoting trimmed ruthlessly]

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?

Good to see you zooming in with keen intellect on the critical bits.

Ken S. Tucker wrote:
The Apollo 17 returned with an astounding 240#'s of moon
rocks,

If you had written mushrooms, I would have assumed you'd helped
yourself prior to posting.

R

Does 'Nietzsche' start with an 'S' ?




"Richard Henry" wrote in message
news:lJCrf.9315$xF6.1927@fed1read01



Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?

RicodJour wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
The Apollo 17 returned with an astounding 240#'s of moon
rocks,

If you had written mushrooms, I would have assumed you'd helped
yourself prior to posting.

R

Mr. R, that did happen in the XVII and XIIIVV missions,
but was suppressed in the XVIIIV mission, for notational
reasons in MCMLX aka MXXXM.

That's the same year Christmas was spelt X-mass,!
and the same year the XIIX was launched, see that,
leaving out the other astronaut.

"gruhn" wrote in message
...
[pathetic amount of overquoting trimmed ruthlessly]

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?

Good to see you zooming in with keen intellect on the critical bits.

What were the critical bits? Most of it looked like net humor.

Richard Henry wrote:
"gruhn" wrote in message
...
[pathetic amount of overquoting trimmed ruthlessly]

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?

Good to see you zooming in with keen intellect on the critical bits.

What were the critical bits? Most of it looked like net humor.

More of a negative net humor - in spreadsheet terms: (humor).

R

Richard Henry wrote:

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?

I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman
numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be a
fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date.

-Mark Martin