![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: apollo, hoax, xiiix |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark Martin wrote: Richard Henry wrote: Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17? I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be a fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date. -Mark Martin It goes with saying, sci.math guys know Roman Numerals, except what they *mean*.... |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message ups.com... Mark Martin wrote: Richard Henry wrote: Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17? I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be a fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date. -Mark Martin It goes with saying, sci.math guys know Roman Numerals, except what they *mean*.... The first time I saw a movie with the line "Copyright CC" I didn't know what it meant until I thought about it a while. It fell outside my experience that all copyright dates began with "MCM..." |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman
numerals for any purpose of any kind Do most of the CA in your office? |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mark Martin" wrote in message oups.com... Richard Henry wrote: Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17? I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be a fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date. Yes, a friend's nephew annouced he was reading a great book about world war eleven. Phil H |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Phil Holman wrote: Yes, a friend's nephew annouced he was reading a great book about world war eleven. On the other side of the coin, I remember ages ago, back in the late '70s, when President Carter was introducing the crew of Apollo 11 at their ten year anniversary party. As he read the prepared speach, he uttered the words, "...the crew of Apollo two..." -Mark Martin |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Henry wrote: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message ups.com... Mark Martin wrote: Richard Henry wrote: Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17? I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be a fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date. -Mark Martin It goes with saying, sci.math guys know Roman Numerals, except what they *mean*.... The first time I saw a movie with the line "Copyright CC" I didn't know what it meant They had movies back then? until I thought about it a while. It fell outside my experience that all copyright dates began with "MCM..." |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... Richard Henry wrote: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message ups.com... Mark Martin wrote: Richard Henry wrote: Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17? I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be a fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date. -Mark Martin It goes with saying, sci.math guys know Roman Numerals, except what they *mean*.... The first time I saw a movie with the line "Copyright CC" I didn't know what it meant They had movies back then? Sorry - I menat "Copyright MM". Too much eggnog. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, a friend's nephew annouced he was reading a great book about world
war eleven. WW 11? I thought that we were up to WW Mcmlllllxvvvvvvvvviiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii by now? Sheesh. Hate to miss a few good WW's! |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
donstockbauer wrote
Yes, a friend's nephew annouced he was reading a great book about world war eleven. WW 11? I thought that we were up to WW Mcmlllllxvvvvvvvvviiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii by now? Sheesh. Hate to miss a few good WW's! WWW = World War Bush |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard Henry" wrote in message news:lJCrf.9315$xF6.1927@fed1read01... "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message ps.com... The Apollo 17 returned with an astounding 240#'s of moon rocks, which of course necessitated leaving one of the astronauts on the moon, although not for the cannibalistic reasons widely circulated in the press. Indeed there is no evidence to support the lunar cannibalism theory, that's a "crackpot" notion. In the "Zaputer Film" where only two astronauts were filmed actually leaving the capsule, the third astronaut is "explained away" as having parachuted down and pick-up earlier. But his astronaut suit is "dry" as he is filmed later. He was a near twin of the stranded astronaut, except for the mole on his left cheek should have been on his elbow, and that's the "smokin gun". NASA's explanation that he ate a hot-dog and missed his mouth and left a piece of relish on his cheek, does not explain the missing "elbow mole", not evident in the film. Additionally, NASA refuses to do a DNA analysis that would PROVE he is the same person! Astounding SPACE AGE TRUTHS. Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17? Cant be, XII+ IX = 21. DF |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Apollo 13 Hoax??? | JKF | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | March 31st 05 08:43 PM |
| XIIix | Star Smart | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | May 24th 04 07:52 AM |
| The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 | Nathan Jones | Physics - General Discussion | 19 | November 11th 03 07:33 PM |
| The Apollo Hoax FAQ | Nathan Jones | Physics - General Discussion | 12 | November 6th 03 05:58 AM |