A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Apollo XIIIX hoax



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 25th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture,sci.math
Ken S. Tucker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,211
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax


Mark Martin wrote:
Richard Henry wrote:

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?


I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman
numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be a
fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date.

-Mark Martin


It goes with saying, sci.math guys know Roman Numerals,
except what they *mean*....

Ads
  #12  
Old December 25th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture,sci.math
Richard Henry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,368
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax


"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
ups.com...

Mark Martin wrote:
Richard Henry wrote:

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?


I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman
numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be a
fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date.

-Mark Martin


It goes with saying, sci.math guys know Roman Numerals,
except what they *mean*....


The first time I saw a movie with the line "Copyright CC" I didn't know what
it meant until I thought about it a while. It fell outside my experience
that all copyright dates began with "MCM..."



  #13  
Old December 26th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture
gruhn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax

I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman
numerals for any purpose of any kind


Do most of the CA in your office?


  #14  
Old December 26th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture
Phil Holman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 128
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax


"Mark Martin" wrote in message
oups.com...

Richard Henry wrote:

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?


I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman
numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be
a
fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date.

Yes, a friend's nephew annouced he was reading a great book about world
war eleven.

Phil H


  #15  
Old December 26th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture
Mark Martin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,334
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax


Phil Holman wrote:

Yes, a friend's nephew annouced he was reading a great book about world
war eleven.


On the other side of the coin, I remember ages ago, back in the late
'70s, when President Carter was introducing the crew of Apollo 11 at
their ten year anniversary party. As he read the prepared speach, he
uttered the words, "...the crew of Apollo two..."

-Mark Martin

  #16  
Old December 26th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture,sci.math
mensanator@aol.compost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 129
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax


Richard Henry wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
ups.com...

Mark Martin wrote:
Richard Henry wrote:

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?

I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman
numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't be a
fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date.

-Mark Martin


It goes with saying, sci.math guys know Roman Numerals,
except what they *mean*....


The first time I saw a movie with the line "Copyright CC" I didn't know what
it meant


They had movies back then?

until I thought about it a while. It fell outside my experience
that all copyright dates began with "MCM..."


  #17  
Old December 26th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture,sci.math
Richard Henry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,368
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax


wrote in message
oups.com...

Richard Henry wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
ups.com...

Mark Martin wrote:
Richard Henry wrote:

Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?

I find it unfathomable as to why people persist in using Roman
numerals for any purpose of any kind. Though I suppose it wouldn't

be a
fun day at the movies without an unreadable copyright date.

-Mark Martin

It goes with saying, sci.math guys know Roman Numerals,
except what they *mean*....


The first time I saw a movie with the line "Copyright CC" I didn't know

what
it meant


They had movies back then?


Sorry - I menat "Copyright MM".

Too much eggnog.



  #18  
Old December 26th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture,sci.math
donstockbauer@hotmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,012
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax

Yes, a friend's nephew annouced he was reading a great book about world
war eleven.



WW 11? I thought that we were up to WW
Mcmlllllxvvvvvvvvviiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

by now? Sheesh. Hate to miss a few good WW's!

  #19  
Old December 26th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture,sci.math
Don
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax

donstockbauer wrote
Yes, a friend's nephew annouced he was reading a great book about world
war eleven.


WW 11? I thought that we were up to WW
Mcmlllllxvvvvvvvvviiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

by now? Sheesh. Hate to miss a few good WW's!


WWW = World War Bush


  #20  
Old December 27th 05 posted to sci.physics,alt.architecture
Dastardly Fiend
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 116
Default Apollo XIIIX hoax


"Richard Henry" wrote in message
news:lJCrf.9315$xF6.1927@fed1read01...

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
ps.com...
The Apollo 17 returned with an astounding 240#'s of moon
rocks, which of course necessitated leaving one of the
astronauts on the moon, although not for the cannibalistic
reasons widely circulated in the press. Indeed there is no
evidence to support the lunar cannibalism theory, that's a
"crackpot" notion.

In the "Zaputer Film" where only two astronauts were filmed
actually leaving the capsule, the third astronaut is "explained
away" as having parachuted down and pick-up earlier.
But his astronaut suit is "dry" as he is filmed later.

He was a near twin of the stranded astronaut, except for the
mole on his left cheek should have been on his elbow, and
that's the "smokin gun". NASA's explanation that he ate
a hot-dog and missed his mouth and left a piece of relish
on his cheek, does not explain the missing "elbow mole",
not evident in the film.

Additionally, NASA refuses to do a DNA analysis that would
PROVE he is the same person!

Astounding
SPACE AGE TRUTHS.


Do you really think that XIIIX is a Roman numeral for 17?


Cant be, XII+ IX = 21.
DF


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apollo 13 Hoax??? JKF Physics - General Discussion 6 March 31st 05 08:43 PM
XIIix Star Smart Physics - General Discussion 0 May 24th 04 07:52 AM
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 Nathan Jones Physics - General Discussion 19 November 11th 03 07:33 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ Nathan Jones Physics - General Discussion 12 November 6th 03 05:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Ringtones - Wikipedia - Credit Cards - Mortgage - Business Credit Card