A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why LiGHT c increases ELiMiNATE HUBBLE's SPACEs. Why LiGHT c increases to iNVERSE PARTiCLE COUNT. Why LiGHT v goes iNVERSE to PATH PARTiCLE COUNT. GR SPACE-time "curvature" is falling, is falling.!! Bohr RADiUS is the PROOF of jOE FiSHER EX



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 16th 05 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.chem,sci.physics.particle,sci.math
brian a m stuckless
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,468
Default Why LiGHT c increases ELiMiNATE HUBBLE's SPACEs. Why LiGHT c increases to iNVERSE PARTiCLE COUNT. Why LiGHT v goes iNVERSE to PATH PARTiCLE COUNT. GR SPACE-time "curvature" is falling, is falling.!! Bohr RADiUS is the PROOF of jOE FiSHER EX

$ Fisher EXPANSiON (FE)
1. Why GRAViTATiONAL constant G is an "attraction".
2. Why GROUNDstate ELECTRONs can't (don't) fall in.
3. Why LiGHT goes automatically c, instantaneously.
4. Why LiGHT goes instantaneously c, automatically.
5. Why LiGHT c is mathematically constant, like pi.
6. Why LiGHT v goes iNVERSE to PATH PARTiCLE COUNT.
7. Why LiGHT c increases to iNVERSE PARTiCLE COUNT.
8. Why LiGHT c increases ELiMiNATE HUBBLE's SPACEs.
GR SPACE-time "curvature" is falling, is falling.!!

Bohr RADiUS is the PROOF of jOE FiSHER EXPANSiON.!!
brian a m stuckless

There is no aether, and none is needed.
Because of the fact that light appears to instantly
"travel" at c when it is emitted, --


Joe Fischer [ Eotvos. ]



Ads
  #2  
Old November 16th 05 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Sue...
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,401
Default Housekeeping


brian a m stuckless wrote:
$ Fisher EXPANSiON (FE)
1. Why GRAViTATiONAL constant G is an "attraction".
2. Why GROUNDstate ELECTRONs can't (don't) fall in.
3. Why LiGHT goes automatically c, instantaneously.
4. Why LiGHT goes instantaneously c, automatically.
5. Why LiGHT c is mathematically constant, like pi.
6. Why LiGHT v goes iNVERSE to PATH PARTiCLE COUNT.
7. Why LiGHT c increases to iNVERSE PARTiCLE COUNT.
8. Why LiGHT c increases ELiMiNATE HUBBLE's SPACEs.
GR SPACE-time "curvature" is falling, is falling.!!

Bohr RADiUS is the PROOF of jOE FiSHER EXPANSiON.!!
brian a m stuckless

There is no aether, and none is needed.
Because of the fact that light appears to instantly
"travel" at c when it is emitted, --


Joe Fischer [ Eotvos. ]


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" .. brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 2 November 16th 05 03:55 PM
LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a, transcendental, MATHEMATiCAL constant.!! LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the PATH particle COUNT.!! brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 1 November 15th 05 11:34 AM
However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is *NOT* "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 0 November 13th 05 09:33 AM
LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the path PARTiCLE COUNT.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! You will NEED essentially in theory, a *well-defined* LaGrangian.!! $ NEW SI GUESS iSS CODATA LaGrangia brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 3 November 13th 05 12:43 AM
Time for particle falling under inverse square force, problem appyling Kepler's harmonic law Randy Poe Physics - General Discussion 1 August 8th 03 10:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Cards - Debt Consolidation - Mbna - Myspace Proxy - Magazine Subscriptions