![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
| Tags: bohr, count, eliminate, falling, goes, hubbles, increases, inverse, light, particle, path, proof, quotcurvaturequot, radius, spaces, spacetime |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
$ Fisher EXPANSiON (FE)
1. Why GRAViTATiONAL constant G is an "attraction". 2. Why GROUNDstate ELECTRONs can't (don't) fall in. 3. Why LiGHT goes automatically c, instantaneously. 4. Why LiGHT goes instantaneously c, automatically. 5. Why LiGHT c is mathematically constant, like pi. 6. Why LiGHT v goes iNVERSE to PATH PARTiCLE COUNT. 7. Why LiGHT c increases to iNVERSE PARTiCLE COUNT. 8. Why LiGHT c increases ELiMiNATE HUBBLE's SPACEs. GR SPACE-time "curvature" is falling, is falling.!! Bohr RADiUS is the PROOF of jOE FiSHER EXPANSiON.!! brian a m stuckless There is no aether, and none is needed. Because of the fact that light appears to instantly "travel" at c when it is emitted, -- Joe Fischer [ Eotvos. ] |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
brian a m stuckless wrote: $ Fisher EXPANSiON (FE) 1. Why GRAViTATiONAL constant G is an "attraction". 2. Why GROUNDstate ELECTRONs can't (don't) fall in. 3. Why LiGHT goes automatically c, instantaneously. 4. Why LiGHT goes instantaneously c, automatically. 5. Why LiGHT c is mathematically constant, like pi. 6. Why LiGHT v goes iNVERSE to PATH PARTiCLE COUNT. 7. Why LiGHT c increases to iNVERSE PARTiCLE COUNT. 8. Why LiGHT c increases ELiMiNATE HUBBLE's SPACEs. GR SPACE-time "curvature" is falling, is falling.!! Bohr RADiUS is the PROOF of jOE FiSHER EXPANSiON.!! brian a m stuckless There is no aether, and none is needed. Because of the fact that light appears to instantly "travel" at c when it is emitted, -- Joe Fischer [ Eotvos. ] |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" .. | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | November 16th 05 03:55 PM |
| LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a, transcendental, MATHEMATiCAL constant.!! LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the PATH particle COUNT.!! | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | November 15th 05 11:34 AM |
| However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is *NOT* "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 13th 05 09:33 AM |
| LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the path PARTiCLE COUNT.!! LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! You will NEED essentially in theory, a *well-defined* LaGrangian.!! $ NEW SI GUESS iSS CODATA LaGrangia | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | November 13th 05 12:43 AM |
| Time for particle falling under inverse square force, problem appyling Kepler's harmonic law | Randy Poe | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | August 8th 03 10:40 PM |