If anybody knows or can tell me the definition of what is galilean referential I would be most grateful. Or where to find something useful about it.


--------------= Posted using GrabIt =----------------
------= Binary Usenet downloading made easy =---------
-= Get GrabIt for free from http://www.shemes.com/ =-

dreed wrote:
If anybody knows or can tell me the definition of what is galilean referential
I would be most grateful. Or where to find something useful about it.

Do you mean Galilean relativity? If so, that's just the form of
relativity
that everybody is aware of from a very young age. Velocities add as
vectors, time and space are absolutes, and so on. If all velocities are
very small fractions of the speed of light, and if you can ignore
gravity,
then Einstein's relativity is well approximated by Galilean relativity.
Socks

"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
oups.com...
dreed wrote:
If anybody knows or can tell me the definition of what is galilean
referential
I would be most grateful. Or where to find something useful about it.

Do you mean Galilean relativity? If so, that's just the form of
relativity
that everybody is aware of from a very young age. Velocities add as
vectors, time and space are absolutes, and so on. If all velocities are
very small fractions of the speed of light, and if you can ignore
gravity,
then Einstein's relativity is well approximated by Galilean relativity.
Socks

Nonsense.
Where on earth did you get the idea that Galileo ignored gravity?

http://exploringdata.cqu.edu.au/ws_galil.htm


The idiot glory seeker Einstein wrote his own nonsense rules you
swallowed his line of bull**** hook line and sinker, didn't you?

http://webexhibits.org/calendars/year-text-Galileo.html
Today Galileo is a famous and romantic name. We have all been taught the
story of his heroic fight in the name of science against the intractable
ignorance of the tyrannical Catholic church. The reality is not so starkly
drawn, but no less interesting for that; Galileo's own arrogance created
many enemies, and Rome's anxiety over its authority in the schismatic era of
the Protestant reformation made their collision inevitable.

Galileo was a professor of mathematics, first at the University of Pisa,
where he had been born, and then at Padua, perhaps establishing a reputation
for his willingness to offend Aristotelian philosophers perhaps, with the
publication of De Motu (On Motion), but for little more. But while
continuing to work as a mathematician, Galileo's interest in philosophy
(i.e., physics) and then astronomy grew. With the publication of Siderius
Nuncius, or The Starry Messenger, in 1610--in which he recorded the sights
he had seen with the newly invented telescope, including the moons of
Jupiter, and the mountains of our own moon-Galileo was instantly famous
across Europe. He was also in the midst of controversy, for few believed him
until his findings could be verified by others with what was still a very
rare instrument (Galileo had made his own) and even then there were disputes
as to what those finding really were. This controversy was no impediment to
his ambitions, and his cultivation of the patronage of Cosimo de Medici,
Duke of Florence-to whom he had dedicated his book, and whose name he gave
to the Jovian moons-led to his being named "Chief Mathematician of the
University of Pisa and Philosopher to the Grand Duke." Mathematicians and
astronomers were not equivalent in the hierarchy of arts to philosophy, and
in his new position Galileo's wars with the Aristotelian philosophers
escalated, for physics was becoming his principle interest.

In 1615 he went to Rome to argue on behalf of the merits of the Copernican
theory, but the political atmosphere was such that Copernicus' De
Revolutionibus was placed on the Index of Prohibited Books in 1616, and his
theory declared "foolish and absurd philosophically and formally heretical
inasmuch as it expressly contradicts the doctrines of the holy scripture."
There is evidence that Galileo was warned against promoting the Copernican
theory at this time. A Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems first
made it past the censors by purporting to be neutral on the astronomical
debate. Its failure to do so was but one of the objections raised after
publication.

It had taken the Catholic Church seventy-three years to deem it neccessary
to ban De Revolutionibus, but when Galileo published A Dialogue Concerning
the Two Chief World Systems in 1632, it reacted within in five months, and
in 1633 his famous trial and recantation took place.

Get real, Socks.

Galileo was an experimenter. Einstein was an armchair theorist, and WRONG.

Observation:
http://www.britastro.org/vss/gifc/00918-ck.gif
Explanation:
http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/sekerin.htm (fig 3)

(Or stars explode twice in three months).
Androcles.

Androcles wrote:
"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
oups.com...
dreed wrote:
If anybody knows or can tell me the definition of what is galilean
referential
I would be most grateful. Or where to find something useful about it.

Do you mean Galilean relativity? If so, that's just the form of
relativity
that everybody is aware of from a very young age. Velocities add as
vectors, time and space are absolutes, and so on. If all velocities are
very small fractions of the speed of light, and if you can ignore
gravity,
then Einstein's relativity is well approximated by Galilean relativity.
Socks

Nonsense.
Where on earth did you get the idea that Galileo ignored gravity?

Where did you get the idea I said he did? Christ you're a ****wit.
Socks

"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
ups.com...
Androcles wrote:
"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
oups.com...
dreed wrote:
If anybody knows or can tell me the definition of what is galilean
referential
I would be most grateful. Or where to find something useful about it.

Do you mean Galilean relativity? If so, that's just the form of
relativity
that everybody is aware of from a very young age. Velocities add as
vectors, time and space are absolutes, and so on. If all velocities are
very small fractions of the speed of light, and if you can ignore
gravity,
then Einstein's relativity is well approximated by Galilean relativity.
Socks

Nonsense.
Where on earth did you get the idea that Galileo ignored gravity?

Where did you get the idea I said he did?

"and if you can ignore gravity," -- Puppet ****.
Why bring it up, ****wit?


Christ you're a ****wit.
Socks
I'm not a snipping **** like you, though, ****wit.
The idiot glory seeker Einstein wrote his own nonsense rules you
swallowed his line of bull**** hook line and sinker, didn't you?
Jesus H. Arsehole you're a moron, Puppet ****.

Androcles.

Androcles wrote:
"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
ups.com...
Androcles wrote:
"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
oups.com...
dreed wrote:
If anybody knows or can tell me the definition of what is galilean
referential
I would be most grateful. Or where to find something useful about it.

Do you mean Galilean relativity? If so, that's just the form of
relativity
that everybody is aware of from a very young age. Velocities add as
vectors, time and space are absolutes, and so on. If all velocities are
very small fractions of the speed of light, and if you can ignore
gravity,
then Einstein's relativity is well approximated by Galilean relativity.
Socks

Nonsense.
Where on earth did you get the idea that Galileo ignored gravity?

Where did you get the idea I said he did?

"and if you can ignore gravity," -- Puppet ****.
Why bring it up, ****wit?


Christ you're a ****wit.
Socks
I'm not a snipping **** like you, though, ****wit.
The idiot glory seeker Einstein wrote his own nonsense rules you
swallowed his line of bull**** hook line and sinker, didn't you?
Jesus H. Arsehole you're a moron, Puppet ****.

What a sad, pathetic, immitation of a human you are.

Why bring it up? Because, when you can ignore gravity you have the
weak field limit. Note that I did not say what to do when you can't
ignore gravity. Nor did I say that Galileo ignores gravity. Nor that
*anybody* ignores gravity. I said *when you can* ignore gravity
then a result follows. It does.

Now go away and be ashamed as you deserve. As usual.
Socks

"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
ups.com...
Androcles wrote:
"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
ups.com...
Androcles wrote:
"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
oups.com...
dreed wrote:
If anybody knows or can tell me the definition of what is galilean
referential
I would be most grateful. Or where to find something useful about
it.

Do you mean Galilean relativity? If so, that's just the form of
relativity
that everybody is aware of from a very young age. Velocities add as
vectors, time and space are absolutes, and so on. If all velocities
are
very small fractions of the speed of light, and if you can ignore
gravity,
then Einstein's relativity is well approximated by Galilean
relativity.
Socks

Nonsense.
Where on earth did you get the idea that Galileo ignored gravity?

Where did you get the idea I said he did?

"and if you can ignore gravity," -- Puppet ****.
Why bring it up, ****wit?


Christ you're a ****wit.
Socks
I'm not a snipping **** like you, though, ****wit.
The idiot glory seeker Einstein wrote his own nonsense rules you
swallowed his line of bull**** hook line and sinker, didn't you?
Jesus H. Arsehole you're a moron, Puppet ****.

What a sad, pathetic, immitation of a human you are.

Why bring it up? Because, when you can ignore gravity you have the
weak field limit. Note that I did not say what to do when you can't
ignore gravity. Nor did I say that Galileo ignores gravity. Nor that
*anybody* ignores gravity. I said *when you can* ignore gravity
then a result follows. It does.

Now go away and be ashamed as you deserve. As usual.
Socks
**** off, you stupid little ****.
Androcles.