What if Albert Einstein didn't apply the basic concept of relativity
to time?

The notion of time as a dimension is based on the irreversibility of
events, which creates our sense of past, present and future. The
assumption is that there is no corresponding opposite direction to
provide symmetry.

A very simple and basic point has been overlooked here; While the
arrow of time for the observer proceeds from past events to future
ones, the arrow of time for these circumstances proceeds from being in
the future, to being in the past. Content and context go in opposite
directions. To the hands of the clock, it is the face going
counterclockwise.

Time isn't a dimension because the frame of reference does not
constitute an absolute against which the point of reference transcribes
another dimension. It is a process in which the point and frame move
relative to their respective influence on one another.

Reality consists of energy recording information. As the amount of
energy remains the same, old information is erased as new is recorded.
This information is a product of relationships of the manifest energy.
As there is no absolute frame, any action is balanced by an "equal and
opposite" reaction. Explicit reality is the energy. Time is only a
function of the information. "Past" and "future" do not exist because
the energy to manifest them is currently tied up in the present. Time
travel would require speeding up or reversing the entire universe.

A clock which would represent this process would have no face, but
innumerable hands going both directions, at various speeds. The sum of
this motion would be zero. Isolating any particular hand as a point of
reference would leave the remaining hands with a net motion in the
opposite direction. As we are part of that frame of reference, we only
see the particular hand move.

The unit of time goes from beginning to end, but the process of time
is going toward the beginning of the next, leaving the old. A day is
measured by the sun rising in the east and setting in the west, but the
reality is the earth is rotating the other direction. As our day ends,
others are dawning.

Think of a factory; The product moves from initiation to completion,
but the production line faces the other way, with its mouth consuming
raw materials and finished product being expelled. Life is the same.
Our lives are units of time going from beginning to end, while the
process of living goes on to the next generation, shedding the old like
dead skin.

The mind is a form of factory and the products are individual
thoughts. Our senses continually take in information and out of this,
we construct coherent conceptual units. Meanwhile the mind continues to
absorb fresh information and as the particular thought matures, it
factors in less of this additional information. At some point a new
thought has taken shape and displaced the previous thought.

This relationship of the process and the unit is one of perspective. A
unit at one level is a process at another and vice versa.

With the assumption that entropy constitutes an irreversible direction
of time, it should be noted that this applies to a closed set. Such a
closed set is a form of unit. As such it does go from beginning to end,
but the larger process is constantly creating new such sets. Much like
any living organism will accumulate metabolic junk and deteriorated DNA
until it dies, but the matter of which it consists will be recycled by
the environment and the larger species will carry on within the context
of an eternal present. remember that in the beginning, it was an open
set, or it never would have formed in the first place.

Time is not so much a projection out from the present event, as it is
a coming together of factors to define what is present. The past is the
influences which defined current order and the future is the sources of
energy which will motivate that order. When the order of the past is an
open set, it absorbs fresh energy, defining it, so the future is a
continuation of the past. When the order is a closed set, the energy
accumulates in open spaces and the future becomes a reaction to the
past. Evolution and revolution.

One of my earlier influences in putting this together was Complexity
Theory, which is based on the same relationship of order and chaos,
except that I replace chaos with energy. The only real difference being
they hadn't associated the relationship of this top down order and
bottom up growth with a description of time. Think about it; The top
down hierarchical order is what we see as evidence of the past. It is
codifying the chaos of this unstructured energy, while the energy/chaos
is constantly building up and breaking down the order, depending on
circumstance.

(As an aside, I also think this relationship was the basis of the
Christian concept of a triune deity; Father as order/past, son as
complex present and holy ghost as fathomless future. Of course the
problem with monotheism is the assumption the absolute is apex, when it
is basis, so that the spiritual absolute would be the essence of being
out of which we rise and to which we fall, rather than a point of
reference from which we fell and seek to return. Consciousness and
intelligence are not synonymous. Good and bad are binary code for the
biological computer. Whole other subject though.....)

Time is a tensor method of measuring motion. Temperature is a scalar
method of measuring motion. Consider statistical measures of the
economy as a form of temperature reading, a general level of activity
against a prevailing scale. Now if we were to follow an individual
through the larger economy, or the activity of a particular atom in a
fluid, it would be a tensor measure. The reason this form of
measurement matters so much to us is that we are that individual.

regards,

brodix

brodix wrote:
What if Albert Einstein didn't apply the basic concept of relativity
to time?

The notion of time as a dimension is based on the irreversibility of
events, which creates our sense of past, present and future. The
assumption is that there is no corresponding opposite direction to
provide symmetry.

A very simple and basic point has been overlooked here; While the
arrow of time for the observer proceeds from past events to future
ones, the arrow of time for these circumstances proceeds from being in
the future, to being in the past. Content and context go in opposite
directions. To the hands of the clock, it is the face going
counterclockwise.

Time isn't a dimension because the frame of reference does not
constitute an absolute against which the point of reference transcribes
another dimension.

You don't understand what a dimension is.

"brodix" wrote in message ups.com...
What if Albert Einstein didn't apply the basic concept of relativity
to time?

But he didn't apply the basic concept of relativity to time.


The notion of time as a dimension is based on the irreversibility of
events,

But the notion of time as a dimension is based on the fact that
physics describes the world in terms of events, and we need
four numbers to unambiguously define an event. Three
numbers are needed to fix the location of the event, and one
number is needed to fix the time.
This way the set of all events in past, present and future forms
a 4-dimensional space in which we can describe and model
a great part of what we think we know of the world.

which creates our sense of past, present and future. The
assumption is that there is no corresponding opposite direction to
provide symmetry.

But just like you have directions North/South, East/West,
Up/Down, you have directions Past/Future. You can't go
to the past, so what? Suppose you are permanently tied
to a permanetly East bound train, so you can't go West.
That does not stop you from describing events and doing
physics.


A very simple and basic point has been overlooked here; While the
arrow of time for the observer proceeds from past events to future
ones, the arrow of time for these circumstances proceeds from being in
the future, to being in the past. Content and context go in opposite
directions. To the hands of the clock, it is the face going
counterclockwise.

Yes, and to the passenger in the East bound train, the
landscape is going to the West.


Time isn't a dimension because the frame of reference does not
constitute an absolute against which the point of reference transcribes
another dimension. It is a process in which the point and frame move
relative to their respective influence on one another.

I have no idea what this means, so I have to stop here.
Perhaps what I told you, can help you understand what
a dimension is - even outside the context of Einstein's
relativity.
I get the impression that you are thinking and talking
about something completely different. It might be a good
idea to use another (- and probably new -) word for that.

Dirk Vdm

"brodix" wrote in message ups.com...
| What if Albert Einstein didn't apply the basic concept of relativity
| to time?

Then we'd have sense instead of nonsense in physics.


| The notion of time as a dimension is based on the irreversibility of
| events, which creates our sense of past, present and future. The
| assumption is that there is no corresponding opposite direction to
| provide symmetry.
|
| A very simple and basic point has been overlooked here; While the
| arrow of time for the observer proceeds from past events to future
| ones, the arrow of time for these circumstances proceeds from being in
| the future, to being in the past. Content and context go in opposite
| directions. To the hands of the clock, it is the face going
| counterclockwise.

Indeed it is, and that's good old Galilean relativity.

What Einstein said was
[quote]
we establish by definition that the "time" required by a turtle to travel
from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A.

In agreement with experience (which means because he says so) we further assume 2AB/(t'A-tA) = c
[end quote]

Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

Actually (AB + BA) = distance x + distance (-x) = 0
so the idiot goes around dividing by 0.

[quote]
For velocities greater than that of a turtle our deliberations become meaningless; we shall, however, find in what follows, that the velocity of a turtle in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity.
[quote]
Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Nothing can go faster than a turtle.
Oops!... Did I say 'a turtle'? Sorry...'light'.
Same phuckwit math, though.

[snip remainder, sorry, I don't have time to comment on it]
Androcles.

"Paul Cardinale" wrote in message oups.com...

| You don't understand what a dimension is.

What is it then, arsehole? You don't know ANYTHING except how to be a ****.
Androcles.

CHAPTER III: CONFRONTATION WITH THEORY OF
RELATIVITY

THE FOUR FUNDAMENTAL FORCES:
The four fundamental forces (as every thing else) are the result of the
effervescence phenomenon, its the same phenomenon with three
variations
according to ethon density variation in an area and to the variation of
the
way particles loose their ethons.

GRAVITY:
Usually Gravity is defined as the force of attraction. But well see
that its not an attraction like we imagine it.
So what is gravity:

Gravity occurs between tow and more bodies.
We said that effervescence of tow particles in an area
creates a third field of ethon which looks like a field created by one
particle. However each particle preserve its own ethon field in this
system
(a system includes many particles or bodies). (See picture n°)
And we also said that direction of ethon current of a body
is from the highest to the lowest density.

Attraction occurs when the SUM of the ethons flow
(of the third field) that is running out of the system PLUS the
ethon flow created by each particle out of the system is BIGGER THAN
ethon flow created inside the system.

A+B+C A1+B1



A: ethons loosed by A in opposite direction to B (out of
system).
B: ethons loosed by B in opposite direction to A (out of
system).
C: ethons of the united field that are always running out
of the syste
A1: ethons loosed by A towards B (inside system).
B1: ethons loosed by B towards A (inside system).

In other words gravity occurs when the physical space (or
space-time) created out of the system is bigger than inside the system.

When A+B+C =A1+B1

That means the smallest body is a satellite of the
biggest. Rotation occurs because the third field of ethons is in
rotation.
And we said that motion is a creation and redistribution of ethons. So
its
the rotation of space time that make one body rotating around the
other.

The explanation of why gravity is so weak is that ethon
density between bodies is very low while the density of ethons inside
the
atom is extremely high.
When A+B+C A1+B1
That means there is a third body, which changes the effervescence
direction of the tow bodies and the system.
Electro-weak force:
The elector-weak force is the result of the way that particles loose
their ethons. So, what happens exactly:
We said that bodies (or particles) loose pre-ethons before these
pre-ethons annihilate into ethons. In this case the particle (or body)
loose pre-ethons in a certain shape: pre-ethons are loosed in a way
that a
given amount of pre-ethons draw a circle. The result of the
annihilation of
these pre-ethons with circle shape creates whirlwinds (of ethons)
exactly
as the explosion of hollow explosive charge (of dynamite).
There are tow directions of whirlwinds of ethons, lets say clockwise
and anti clockwise. These directions of rotation define the charge of a
particle.
So why tow particles with the same charge are attracted to each other
while tow particles with opposite charge are repulsed from each other.
To answer this question we must return to our example of tow particles
in effervescence in the same area.
Remember: The effervescence of tow particles in an area creates a third
field of ethon which looks like a field created by one particle.
However
each particle preserve its own ethon field in this system (a system
includes many particles or bodies).
The attraction or repulsion of the tow bodies depends on the evolution
of the amount of physical space between them. They are attracted if
physical space created (and redistributed) inside the system is less
than
physical space created (and redistributed by ethon current) out of the
system.
When tow whirlwinds (of ethons) with the same direction of rotation are
put together they annihilate creating a big amount of ethons between
the
tow particles. Thats why tow particles with the same charge are
repulsed
from each other.
When tow whirlwinds (of ethons) with opposite directions of rotation
are
put together, their strength is boosted and by the way the ethon
current
that is running out of the system is boosted making the amount of
ethons
inside the system less important than the amount of ethons (produced
and
redistributed) out of the system.
Thats why tow particles with opposite charge are attracted to each
other.

Strong nuclear force:
Tow protons put together must create repulsion. Why its not the case
in
the nucleus:
Protons loose pre-ethons in circle shape, the annihilation of the
pre-ethons circles create whirlwinds (of ethons). These whirlwinds are
supposed to make a repulsion but when we add tow neutrons, these
neutrons
also loose pre-ethons making circles loosed by protons disappear
(circle
shape is disturbed by pre-ethons loosed by neutrons) and by the way
whirlwinds disappear too.
These whirlwinds disappear inside the nucleus not out of it.

Why there is attraction and not repulsion?
Repulsion; attraction; or rotation depends on the effervescence rhythm
of a system. This rhythm is related to distances; masses; charges
etc.
This relation is not linear . I cant say more.
Observation: All photons are whirlwinds, but not all whirlwinds are
photons.
SPACE-TIME CURVATU
Space-time curvature is the contrast of ethons density. Gravity to an
area occurs when the ethon density there is higher than it is in the
surrounding.
For example: Gravity of an object to earth is due to high density of
ethons that surround earth (ethon density decreases when we go forwards
an
object)
And we said that ethon current direction is from the highest density to
the lowest density so this direction is deviated when the object comes
near
earth.
Earth and object are a system where the direction of ethons (of both
earth and object) is out of the system. That means space is increasing
out
of the system. In addition to that, the flow of the third ethon field
(the
common field of earth and object) is going out of the system. That
means
space between the tow objects is decreasing. The combination of the tow
effects creates the apparent attraction.
Non-locality:
We said that ethon density decrease when we go forward the nucleus. The
contrast will be very high between an atom and its surrounding and even
inside the atom itself.
That means space time isnt the same and thats the origin of some
quantum strangeness. And among them the uncertainty principle.
So what are origins of non-locality:

Trajectory of a particle inside an atom (in high ethon density) is a
continuous succession of ethons. But when we transpose this trajectory
out
of the atom (in lower ethon density) it will give us a discontinuous
succession of ethon.
The high contrast inside the atom means space-time curvature. That
means
we can see one object in tow positions at the same time. Its similar
to
the effect of the sun gravity, which make us see one star in different
positions at the same time.
The high contrast (of ethon density) makes informations dont arrive to
us in the right chronological order, because its deviated by (micro)
space-time curvatures.
- A particle loose pre-ethons in a position A and move to position
B.pre-ethons are annihilating in position A and particle is
annihilating in
position B. and we said that all properties of matter are result of its
effervescence. so we have an illusion to see the particle in tow
position
at the same time.
May be thats why an electron is seen as a cloud around the
nucleus.
LIGHT SPEED:
Well try here to explain how light speed is constant. Well also
explain the physical time contraction.
Relations are not linear, but to make the explanation easy will suppose
them linear.
Lets start:
Light speed is constant in physical space according to the absolute
time.
That means light cross the same amount of ethons during an absolute
second.
Light speed isnt constant according to absolute space.
This constancy is due to:
- Absence of mass, this makes photons insensitive to background waves.
And may be light is the only thing that exist continuously. (See
quantum
entanglement)
Constancy of light speed:
When people or objects are traveling at a substantial fraction of the
speed of light; the density of ethons out of the system changes making
the
density of ethons inside the system (inside rocket) changing too.
If rocket speed is 50% of LS; the amount of ethons inside a ruler
becomes twice it is on earth. If a ruler length on earth was X ethons,
it
will be 2X in the rocket. However number of atoms that make the ruler
remain the same.
So what changed?
Its the ethon density inside the atom and in space
between atoms that changed. Their changing isnt proportional. But the
combination of the tow (atom and space between atoms) makes the length
of
the ruler (by ethons) twice its length on earth.

And we said that light speed cross ethons is constant, so light will
take twice absolute time to cross the ruler.
But what happens to atomic time? (See definition of atomic time)
In the other hand we said that ethon density inside atoms changed, so
speed inside atoms also changed (see definition of motion).
Oscillations
(are motion) inside atoms are twice slower. Thats why light speed
according to atomic time remains the same.
Observation:
This model can explain other physical phenomenon like: light refraction
diffraction and absorption, dark energy and many others but I think
its
useless. All I want is to introduce you to this view.
ACCELERATORS:
According to our hypothesis when traveling at a substantial fraction of
the speed of light: life of a single particle (not system) must
decrease,
while atomic time contracts.
But experimentation shows that particle life is longer in an
accelerator. This can be explained by the fact that this particle (in
very
high speed) absorbs energy of whirlwinds that it cross inside the
accelerator. (See whirlwinds in explanation of elector-weak and strong
forces).
These whirlwinds crossed (and absorbed) in the accelerator, change the
inertia -resistance- of the particle to effervescence (mass is inertia
resistance- to effervescence).
This increasing of life particle inside an accelerator is a kind of
matter creation. (See matter creation).
Observation: all photons are whirlwinds but not all whirlwinds are
photons.



CHAPTER IV: CONFRONTATION WITH QUANTUM
MECHANICS

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT
There is tow ways to explain quantum entanglement:
The first is short and too easy, but it doesnt allow a perfect
Simultaneity.
The second is a little bit complicated but it allows (in given
conditions) a perfect Simultaneity.
First explanation:
The space-time waves are crossed by waves like sound waves in sea
waves.
When we prepare two particles in a single quantum state they are in the
same diapason, that means one particle vibrates according to the
vibration
of the other particle.
This explanation presuppose sound-like waves inside space-time waves
spreading faster than the speed of light, and the Simultaneity will not
be
perfect.
The second explanation is more interesting

Second explanation:
We said that all properties of a particle are a result of its
effervescence, a particle without effervescence doesnt exist
physically.
The effervescence process isnt continuos, its discontinuous, the
effervescence is a succession of short effervescence sequences. We
suppose
that effervescence process is generated by background waves coming from
the
origin of the universe from the big bang explosion.
When a background wave hits a particle it releases one effervescence
sequence of this particle and creates an echo of the background wave.
The
background wave spreads in one way only, while its echo spreads in all
directions forwards the particle.
Our world doesnt exist continuously (because the background waves and
their echo are not everywhere every time).

When we prepare two particles in a single quantum state they are in the
same diapason, that means one particle vibrates according to the
vibration
of the other particle.
The Simultaneity will be perfect from A to B if this background wave
direction is from A to B.
It will be imperfect if the background wave is from B to A, in this
case
its the echo of the background wave coming from A that brings the
vibration to B, time of correlation will be an entire number of one
effervescence sequence.
If we suppose that a single sequence of effervescence duration is a
chronon, then time of correlation between A and B will be x choronon
with x
entire number.
THE DUALITY WAVE-PARTICLE:
We said that matter is annihilating into pre-ethons before these
pre-ethons disintegrate into ethons.
The amount of ethons produced by the pre-ethons annihilation is not
linear its wavy. That means the space-time is wavy.
In young experimentation interference fringes are made by space-time
waves and because particles are moving in space-time their impact
correspond to space-time waves impact.


The particle exhibits a wave-like behavior when space-time waves have
some properties and it exhibits a particle-like behavior when
space-time
waves have other properties.
These properties can be:

Space-time waves: length, height, frequency and direction.
The particle exhibits a particle-like behavior when:

The sum of space-time waves in physical vacuum and space-time waves
produced by the particle effervescence is null.
The sum is space-time waves with very long wavelength.
The sum is space-time waves with very short height.

The measurement problem:
Measurement means information, and information means a motion of
something (matter or photons) from the measured area to the measurement
instrument.
In other words measurement is a deviation at least of ethons. This
deviation perturbs space-time waves and by the way perturbs the sum of
space-time waves of the particle and vacuum.
This measurement can also change the effervescence rhythm of the
particle.
Young experiment:
In young experiment the measurement disturbs synchronization between
space-time waves coming through the tow pinholes, The interference
fringes
disappear and the interference fringes of the particle disappear also.
The disturbance occurs only at the measurement, because it occurs only
when real deviation (of ethons) occurs.
The synchronization between the tow pinholes disappear instantly, but
it
takes a while to appear again.
We can say the same thing about the synchronization between space-time
waves produced by a particle and space-time waves in vacuum it
disappear
instantly but it take a while to appear again. (a particle have an
inertia
-resistance- to change its effervescence rhythm)






MATTER CREATION (AND MANY WORLDS):

MATTER CREATION :
We said that all properties of a particle are a result of its
effervescence. Particle without effervescence doesnt exist physically.
Our world is filled with particles without effervescence, without mass
(mass is inertia resistance-of a body to effervescence) this lack of
effervescence is due may be to:
-The matter structure.
-Or to its absolute speed (in absolute space).
-Or to its insensitiveness to the background waves we mention in
quantum
entanglement.
Whatever, when a photon cross (to avoid saying hits) this particle in
given conditions, the photon energy changes the structure of this
particle
making it in effervescence state.
The relation between energy and mass is in fact a relation between
energy and the particle inertia-resistance- to effervescence.
MANY WORLDS:
This parallel world (or worlds) isnt well structured as ours, its
rather a pollution of our world than a parallel world.
Real parallel worlds (structured like ours) can exist but not in the
same absolute location we have.
However this pollution particles have memory, and interference with
our world thats may be the explanation of some paranormal
phenomenon.


CONCLUSION


I titled this paper a sketch. because its an outline.
I hope you have understood this amateur view.
My goal is to share this idea (may be its helpful in
someway), Youll agree that Ive a monstrous lack of knowledge in
physics
and mathematics, but my reasoning is logical, naïve but logical.

Ive been told that to be taken seriously a hypothesis
must be crazy .I tried to make it as crazy as possible, unfortunately I
couldnt leave my common sense, sorry I need it

Certainly this paper is worthless but no one can say its
wrong. If we really reached the common sense limits neither wrong nor
right
remains.

The only hope this paper has comes from the fact that
mathematicians at a macroscopic and microscopic scale with existing
technology can simulate this hypothesis.
A further understanding will lead us to make predictions
that can be verified by experimentation.

I hope this idea is enough explained and expound to pass
judgement on. (As an amateur of course).
This paper doesnt need comments I am not able to
understand them. But you can help me by giving address of physics
amateur
web site. And if you have some advises about studies in Europe send
them
to:

BELGUERNINE AHMED:
.
.

THEORY OF EVERYTHING.
A SKETCH.
BY B. AHMED


FOREWORD
INTRODUCTION


PRELIMINARY CHAPTER: CHOICE OF EUCLIDEAN SPACE AND
ABSOLUTE TIME.

CHAPTER I: EFFERVESCENCE PHENOMENON.



EFFERVESCENCE PHENOMENON
EFFERVESCENCE FIELDS

CHAPTER II: NEW CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS





WHAT IS TIME?
WHAT IS SPACE?
WHAT IS SPACE-TIME?
WHAT IS MOTION?
WHAT IS ENERGY?
WHAT IS FORCE?
WHAT IS MASS?



CHAPTER III: CONFRONTATION WITH THEORY OF
RELATIVITY:
The four fundamental forces:
The light speed:
The curvature of space-time:


CHAPTER IV: CONFRONTATION WITH QUANTUM
MECHANICS
QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT:
THE DUALITY WAVE-PARTICLE:
MATTER CREATION (AND MANY WORLDS):

CONCLUSION




FOREWORD

this an amateur work, if you have no time for entertainment
please ignore it.

Hi!

This paper is an attempt to answer why modern physics
works while nobody knows how it can be like that. It s an attempt to
combine the four fundamental forces; to explain the measurement
problem, to
explain the duality wave-particle, to explain why light speed is
constant
etc.

Am I right? Am I wrong? I don t care.
The paper in it s all is wrong but maybe somewhere there
is a part of truth.

I am not a physicist. Physics are my hobby.
My English is very bad.
But I really want to share my thoughts of amateur with
someone who can understand. You have here a funny idea clumsily
expressed.

I intend this paper to be understood by professionals, but
I am afraid my very bad English and the use of a non-professional style
made it very hard to read and seem worthless.

I don t believe in many things, but I prefer keeping my common sense, I
prefer this hypothesis to quantum strangeness. I agree that common
sense is
based on unproved axioms, but I think, in physics we didn t yet reach
the
common sense limits.

Whatever I ll not die more ignorant than any other man. No
one knows the truth, (if there is any truth).

Common sense will tell you not to read this article, but
common sense is no more reliable guide in modern physics, so let s take
a
look at it. It s worth reading (right or wrong? it doesn t
matter).
Read this paper as an entertainment; don t take it seriously. Read it
as
a fiction.
I hope you ll enjoy it. Have a good read.




Introduction:


"Some people say that only few men understood the theory
of relativity. And no one understands quantum mechanics. ...
Is it true? No problem this paper starts away from these
two theories and far from any other theory. We will start from an
Euclidean
space with absolute time and absolute space , measurements will be
given
instantly (we ll not be limited by the information speed)
I know that it s practically useless in experimentation
and practical calculations but it s necessary to explain my hypothesis.
Don
t worry relativity; curved space-time; quantum mechanics . All will be
explained. (Almost J)
I begin this paper by a preliminary chapter to explain the
choice of the Euclidean space and the absolute time, these four
dimensions
are our reference. I prefer to call it absolute reference because it
deals
with absolute space and absolute time.
To understand my hypothesis you must first understand the
effervescence phenomenon which is the first chapter subject;
Then you must understand the new concepts according to
this hypothesis (definition of space-time; energy; force etc) these
definitions are given in chapter tow.
Before reading following chapters (III and IV) you must
digest previous ones (I and II) not because it s difficult to
understand
but there s too many informations to catch.
Chapter III and IV contain a confrontation of my
hypothesis with theory of relativity and quantum mechanics,
Our theoretical basis is not deducible from quantum
mechanics or from theory of relativity but it lead us to their
interpretation. It s rather an interpretation than a confrontation, we
try
to explain the measurement problem, the duality wave-particle, the wave
function collapse the quantum entanglement and other physic s
phenomena.


PRELIMINARY CHAPTER: CHOICE OF EUCLIDEAN SPACE AND
ABSOLUTE TIME.
At the start of this chapter we agree that the continuous
real line that we see is a creation of our brain and nervous system.
Everything we see and touch is made up of fundamental particles.

Our intuition about the time flow is also a creation of
our brain. But we ll start here in a four absolute dimensions reference
(three dimensions of the Euclidean space + absolute time): that means
physical space-time will be studied in absolute space and absolute
time.

In an Euclidean space, time and space are treated as
distinct dimensions, while in the following definition of physical time
and
physical space it s hard to make a distinction between them. Actually
it s
hard to make distinction between all properties of matter.

So please always remember: here time and space are
absolute and events measurements are given instantly (we ll not
be limited by information speed).

I think there s no need to give definition to this
absolute reference , it s an intuition everyone has, however I am
afraid
some physicists have forgot it.

If you don t need more details (and I am sure you don t)
go straight ahead to chapter one. But if you want to know my view of
absolute space and absolute time read the following paragraphs.

Absolute space:

Absolute space corresponds to
our intuitive understanding of space, it s the three dimensional
Euclidean
space.
The standard meter or simply
meter, is defined as the distance traveled by light in a vacuum during
a
time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second. But information brought by
light is not reliable. This is due to the Structure of space-time and
not
to the light speed.
To more details see my
explanation of the uncertainty principle, You ll see that light
speed is the most reliable but remain not totally reliable.
Otherwise, Space measurement
needs a distance standard which means a piece of matter a ruler to
compare its length with other elements length. Because made up of
matter
the ruler will never remain the same (matter looses energy and gains
energy, looses particles and gains particles constantly).
The distance standard is
reliable only exactly at the moment T0 when it has been chosen as a
distance standard . At a different
moment (T T0) the distance standard is no more the same, it
changed.

The only way to have an
absolute distance standard is to freeze the ruler exactly at the
moment
we choose it as a distance standard . Freezing it, means no loss or
absorption of energy no loss or absorption of particles no motion of
atoms
and even no motion inside atoms.
It will be a reliable ruler
but not absolutely reliable because the space inside the ruler will be
heterogeneous (see definition of physical space).


Absolute time:

The « conventional second is defined as 9 192 631
770 oscillations of specified transition in Cs-133 atom.
Atom means matter, and we said that matter is not stable
its constantly changing (matter looses energy and gains energy, looses
particles and gains particles constantly).
And youll agree that Cs-133 atom oscillation is not the
same since the big bang and until the big crunch. Its always changing.
This changing occurs even during the shortest moment.

The only way to have an absolute time standard of a
second is to freeze that second oscillations sequence exactly at the
moment
we choose it as a time standard I mean to catch it like we catch a
video
sequence.
The Cs-133 atom will be isolated (no interactions with
outside elements) and the oscillation sequence can be played as many
times
as we want, the same sequence will be seen each time with no change.
Thats the only way to have a reliable time standard but
not absolute time standard because the time flow inside this time
standard will be heterogeneous. (See definition of physical time).

Absolute reference point:

In addition to time standard and space standard, well
need an absolute reference point. We know that every thing is moving
even
those who seem to have stability.

The only way to have an absolute reference point is to
take the census of the universe even of other dimensions (see
definition of
many worlds). The map of our world will correspond to the space-time
map.
Once we have a map of universe in its multiple dimensions,
then and only then any point can be taken as a reference point.

Conclusion:
Absolute time and absolute space are a creation of our
brain, of our intuition and here the use of the absolute reference
made
the explanation of this hypothesis very easy.

You have an idea now how clumsy is my explanation and how
bad is my English. But beyond this clumsiness theres an idea I count
on
your to catch (true or false doesnt matter) so please keep reading.








CHAPTER I: EFFERVESCENCE PHENOMENON.



EFFERVESCENCE PHENOMENON

Matter is dissolving; its annihilating. Every particle
(or body) is disintegrating into ethons. Ethons are the smallest
particles in our hypothesis.
We can compare this phenomenon to an effervescent tablet.
Therefore our hypothesis will be called the effervescence hypothesis.
(Keep in mind a picture of an effervescent tablet.)

Every particle disintegrates into pre-ethons before these
pre-ethons disintegrate into ethons.
Well need pre-ethons to explain the elector-weak force
and the strong nuclear force.

Density of ethons around a particle defines its
effervescence characteristics: the general direction of ethons and
their
intensity (according to absolute time). This relation between the
density
of ethons around a particle and the particle effervescence is not
linear.

I dont see difference between density and intensity,
perhaps because my vision is above space-time. Whatever when I use
density
I am taking an instant picture, when I use intensity its a sequence in
absolute time.

EFFERVESCENCE FIELDS:

The effervescence process creates a field of moving
ethons. This field can be visualized as a pattern of circular field
lines
surrounding the particle (or body).
The general direction of ethons lines is given according
to the density of ethons out of the particle. The general direction of
ethons is from the highest density to the lowest density.

All space is filled with moving ethons. Note that physical
vacuum doesnt mean emptiness its filled with ethons and other kinds
of
matter. In our hypothesis we make distinction between physical vacuum
and
the absolute vacuum in the Euclidean space.



The effervescence of tow particles (or bodies) in an area
creates a third field of ethon which looks like a field created by one
particle. However each particle preserve its own ethon field in this
system
(a system includes many particles or bodies).
There are no big complications arising in the many-body cases. (Picture
n°).

All properties of a particle are a result of the
effervescence phenomenon. A particle with no effervescence cant be
detected, it have no mass no charge no energy no physical location.
(See
definitions of these properties below.)
No detection doesnt mean no existence. (See definition of
many worlds).
Its amazing: what we observe is not matter itself, but its effect on
space-time.


CHAPTER II: NEW CONCEPTS AND
DEFINITIONS

We have here new definitions of the main properties of
matter and physical phenomenon according to the effervescence
phenomenon.
These definitions make it hard to make distinction between
all properties of matter. Every thing seems to be a result of the
effervescence phenomenon.

WHAT IS TIME

We have one definition of physical time but we find three
different flows of time.
The tow others can be considered as perceptions of time
rather than time itself.

Here is the definition of main physical time, I call it
ambient time.

The ambient time (or physical time):

The effervescence hypothesis defines time in an area as the amount of
ethons flowing per unit of absolute time through this area. In other
words
its the intensity of ethons current, this intensity defines the
effervescence rhythm of a particle in this area.

If we take a picture, time flow in a given area is
proportional to the amount of ethons in this area. Our perception of
this
time in physical vacuum is possible only if we put a particle in it,
because our perception of time is based on atomic time.

Note: intensity is from an absolute time point of
view. You agree that we cant define physical time according to
physical
time.

The density of ethons decreases when we go forward the atom nucleus.
Lets suppose that there are three main densities of ethons so three
levels
of physical time flow. (We choose three to explain the three
fundamental
forces: gravity, elector-weak force and strong nuclear force). The
three
densities are in:
-The immediate surroundings of nucleus (area of strong nuclear
interaction)
-Inside atoms. (Source of elector-weak interaction).
-Outside atoms. (Area of gravity, but not exclusive area).


The particle time flow:

Its the amount of ethons loosed by a particle per unit of
absolute time. We can call it particles life.
Its like an hourglass: lot of loosed ethons means short
particle life, less loosed ethons means long particle life.

The effervescence rhythm of a particle is defined by the
density of ethons around it. And we said that physical time is the
density
of ethons. So the particle life is defined by the physical
time.


The atomic time: (or conventional time).

Conventional time is defined according to oscillations of
specified transition in Cs-133 atom. We can call it also atomic time.
This time isnt true for subatomic elements. Normal its
based on atoms. Its the time for mechanic phenomena like clocks, and
for
biologic phenomena like humans. In other words all phenomena were atoms
are
considered as the basic elements.

Atomic time is based on atom oscillations, so its based
on motion inside atoms. And well see that physical motion is a
creation
and redistribution of physical space-time so a creation and
redistribution of ethons (see definition of motion).

Well see that motion is a result of the
effervescence.
And we said that the effervescence rhythm (= motion) of a
particle is defined by the ethon density out of it, so the particle
speed
is defined by the density of ethons out of this particle, so of
physical
space-time.



WHAT IS SPACE:
Space is usually defined as a part of the fundamental
structure of the universe, a set of dimensions in which objects are
separated and located, have size and shape, and through which they can
move.

Physical space is not continuous, its made up of
particles that we call ethons.
The distance between tow physical points is the amount of
ethons on the imaginary line between them.

Because ethons are in a perpetual motion the amount of
ethon between tow absolute points is always changing.

We said above that all properties of a particle are the
result of its effervescence. In the physical space the particle itself
doesnt exist. The only thing we can see and measure is its
effervescence.
And according to our definition of physical space, the
diameter of a particle is null because ethons are only around the
particle.



WHAT IS SPACE-TIME:

We gave distinct definitions to physical time and physical
space, and youve seen that its hard to make distinction between them.

Lets try now to give a definition of space-time according
to the four-dimensional absolute reference (with absolute time and
Euclidean space):

We can visualize Space-time as a sea of ethons
strings in constant evolution.
The amount of ethons in each string defines at the same
time the physical time duration and the physical length of this string.


Space-time can be seen as a geographic map of ethons (a
four dimensional map in the absolute reference).


WHAT IS MOTION:

Motion occurs when bodies change their position in space with
"time."
In our hypothesis we describe motion in an absolute reference:
Motion seen in our four absolute dimensions is an addition of:
-Absolute motion (body changes its position from an absolute point A to
an absolute point B) which is the real motion, even we dont know if
there
is real motion.
AND
-Physical motion which is a creation of space and redistribution of
space (we said that physical space is made up of ethons, so its a
creation
of ethons and a redistribution of these ethons with no real motion.
In other words if we have tow bodies A and B moving from each other. In
fact there is no move its the amount of ethons between them, which is
changing. Its the physical space between them that is
changing.
This definition is neither for continuity nor for discontinuity. The
background of this apparent discontinuity (in our hypothesis) may be a
real
continuity or may be a real discontinuity. Were far from giving the
answer.
Whatever, motion remain a miracle for me; I really dont understand
it.


WHAT IS ENERGY:
Energy is effervescence AND effervescence is energy, its the loss of
ethons by a body, its a creation of space-time particles (ethons).
If you compare our definition of motion to this definition of energy
youll find thats hard to make distinction between energy and
motion.
Energy is everywhere.
Zero-energy doesnt exist, we said that all properties of a particle
are
a result of its effervescence, a particle without effervescence cant
be
detected, and is not located in our « world » its in an other
dimension. (See many-worlds definition).
Even physical vacuum is filled of energy (of moving ethons) but its
hard to detect it when space is devoid of matter.
The concept of energy that common people have can be defined as an
acceleration of the effervescence rhythm of a body (its annihilation)
compared to its effervescence in average conditions.
In other words its the energy human senses can detect (visible motion,
heat, shape changingetc). Actually energy (and motion) is every where
every time even at absolute zero degree.
Different bodies have different rhythms of effervescence in same
conditions. These rhythms can be deduced from the ability of this body
to
refract, diffract and absorb light and energy.


WHATS
FORCE:
Ill give a short definition to force, I cant expand it mo
Force is an effervescence modulation inside a system caused by:

An unstable physical system looking for stability
Or a physical system in stability trying to maintain its stability or
to
recover it.
Force is simply: The effervescence (rhythm) modulation in order to
reach
a stability, to maintain it or to recover it.
Whatever, its useless to expand this definition. Our vision of force
isnt important to the hypothesis in its all.
WHATS
MASS:
Mass of physical objects is the amount of matter they contain. Thats
the classic definition.
In our hypothesis, the body property we measure and call mass isnt the
amount of matter but the inertia resistance- of this body to loose
ethons
(in other words its effervescence).
Effervescence and by the way mass are not only related to the amount of
matter but are also related to the structure of matter and may be to
its
absolute speed.

Dirk,

But the notion of time as a dimension is based on the fact that
physics describes the world in terms of events, and we need
four numbers to unambiguously define an event. Three
numbers are needed to fix the location of the event, and one
number is needed to fix the time.
This way the set of all events in past, present and future forms
a 4-dimensional space in which we can describe and model
a great part of what we think we know of the world.

Not according to the uncertainty principle. You cannot know both
position and action at the same time.

regards,

brodix

Paul,

You don't understand what a dimension is.

It seems to me that our principles and laws are approximations of
reality, rather then the foundation on which it's based, so a dimension
would be what the most people effectively agree that it is.

The origin of the concept is as a basic linear measure of space. This
concept has since been expanded to include other conceptual parameters.


How would you describe a dimension?

Reality is if we did not incorporate time into the other three
dimensions it would only make matters more complicated. Bert